We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.10 | 10.53% | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.075 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 46,932,191 | 13:11:24 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -0.95 | 43.65M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/1/2020 22:45 | DHV GL only issued a Statement of Feasibility for the prototype 'agricultural' unit. It was not a final Technology Qualification. That would require the Company to build and further test a full sized commercial system, the first of which will be for just 25 tpd, with later enlargement to 35 tpd according to David Ryan. However, they don't even have planning consent yet, the 25 tpd unit and site works will take a year to build according to Keith Allaun, and then months to test - let's say six months. During this process further unforseen problems could arise, meaning more expense and more delays, or even suspension. So no final Qualification until H2 2021 at the earliest, if they are lucky and no guarantees overall. Meanwhile lots more dilution. Lemmings and mushrooms only. | ken chung | |
21/1/2020 19:55 | Coldspring, that's a fair comment. A statement of feasibility is different to a working unit. There is a working unit at the University of Chester, but admittedly that is a prototype and not a commercial unit. What the statement of feasibility does show is that a multi-billion company with a strong reputation has done it's due diligence on the technology and stated it can be achieved. So with funding in place, it's a goer. | cmackay | |
21/1/2020 19:15 | It was a statement of feasibility following an assessment of the technology. Feasibility and a working unit are quite different imho and the share price at the time reacted according to my view. | coldspring | |
21/1/2020 19:08 | DHV GL only issued a Statement of Feasibility for the prototype 'agricultural' unit. It was not a final Technology Qualification. That would require the Company to build and further test a full sized commercial system, the first of which will be for just 25 tpd, with later enlargement to 35 tpd according to David Ryan. However, they don't even have planning consent yet, the 25 tpd unit and site works will take a year to build according to Keith Allaun, and then months to test - let's say six months. During this process further unforseen problems could arise, meaning more expense and more delays, or even suspension. So no final Qualification until H2 2021 at the earliest, if they are lucky and no guarantees overall. Meanwhile lots more dilution. Lemmings and mushrooms only. | ken chung | |
21/1/2020 17:50 | PowerHouse Energy (PHE); DMG®’s successful independent technology assessment by DNV GL 'That what they got' . | kcowe | |
21/1/2020 17:44 | DNV-GL Certification , is worth a fortune to new tech. It validates to any prospective business , look were open transparent and our tech works , backed by the DNV-GL Guarantee. And DNV-GL Promotes tech it likes ...with their vast partnerships and Bluechip Customer base .. go look at their website .DNV-GL.CO.UK Just see what they are about . will blow your mind. | kcowe | |
21/1/2020 17:43 | I think you need to read what they actually gave them and not what you THINK they gave them. | coldspring | |
21/1/2020 17:38 | DNV-GL.. has given PHE a certificate that the technology is what is says on the can.So it works 100% Guaranteed . | kcowe | |
21/1/2020 16:53 | I prefer to believe the positive RNSs. Quotes from the last two below: 'Peel L&P Environmental, have completed their review of the completed engineering work and moved to commitment to the next stage of development and engineering for the Protos Energy Park. Peel are committing to fund the next stage of development of the DMG® plant at Protos up to a financial close, the point at which full project third party funding is secured. With preliminary engineering for the site having been completed, the design has progressed such that the DMG® facilities at Protos would now have the capacity to process 35 tonnes per day of waste plastics, targeting to produce 3.8MWe on site and exporting 3.4MWe electricity and up to 2 tonnes of hydrogen per day from the site. The planning permission application is currently under review.' 'Grant for DMG Hydrogen from Waste Development at Protos PowerHouse Energy Group plc (AIM: PHE), the UK technology company pioneering hydrogen production from waste plastic, is delighted to announce that a grant of £1.25m has been awarded to, Waste2tricity Protos Ltd, for the DMG® Hydrogen from Waste development at Protos, near Ellesmere Port, in Cheshire. The Company’s development partner Waste2Tricity (W2T) have secured the grant for the development on behalf of its subsidiary following a successful application to the £4.1m Energy Fund competition, run by Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) as part of the Local Growth Fund (LGF), which awards capital grants for projects that can support the objectives of the LEP’s Energy and Clean Growth Strategy.' Peel Environmental are part of very successful, multi-billion company. I would be very surprised if they associated themselves with unrealistic projects. Why have LEP made an award? Two more negative, non-investors to filter. Hopefully they filter me! | zeppo | |
21/1/2020 14:09 | Nail on the head Jim! Well played sir well played | coldspring | |
21/1/2020 13:37 | The market makers are desperately trying to Mark this down. But demand is too strong. Can see this in new range back to 1 to 1.3 range soon. As the new company post merger consolidates. Great prospects here. More and more Shares are moving to long term holders who like the concept and can see the size of the potential market. | whatsthepoint | |
21/1/2020 12:07 | Ken how many more times please call Howard and do some research. | whatsthepoint | |
21/1/2020 12:05 | There's a reason for that. Their revenue is going up, but their losses are also going up. | vatnabrekk | |
21/1/2020 11:49 | If you want to know how much they are worth look at EQT. Already commercial and only valued at £6m. | ken chung | |
21/1/2020 11:48 | Are you seriously saying that PHE could not have just have picked up the phone themselves and gone directly to people like Peel or Toyota but for some reason needed a bloke in jeans and red trainers to do it instead and then give him £20k a month and 40% of the company? Really? Or even that Peel or Toyota couldn't approach PHE the other way around? Pre W2T, PHE were regularly saying how many leads they were getting weren't they? You sound like you work for W2T. Do you? | ken chung | |
21/1/2020 10:48 | Tewkesbury that's all well and good and perhaps that's one of the reasons the board of PHE has changed and indeed needs more strengthening. your grievance is not with me,I am just saying we have to do today what we need to do to ensure that the company prospers from the point it is at now. we cant turn the clock back to iron out previous mistakes. the point is the market has reacted very, very, well with the proposal so we should all be celebrating and wanting to ensure it passes the vote by the shareholders. alternatively we are back to square one. onwards and most definitely upwards from this platform. | whatsthepoint | |
21/1/2020 10:30 | PHE should have done due diligence and not have given rights to W2T without first ensuring W2T had a guaranteed facility to fund its share of costs towards at least the first couple of units. Looks like they didn't even insert a full reversion rights clause in the event W2T could not find funding? Hence now having to buy those rights back. | tewkesbury | |
21/1/2020 10:26 | Whatsthepoint they previously took a Pyomex order from Poland and was going to build a Pyromex system at Eiting in Germany and then roll out elsewhere all without W2T so that seems to indicate it had already received enough commercial interest even without W2T. | tewkesbury | |
21/1/2020 10:10 | If you are all so unhappy that PhE is paying too much sell up and move on. I for one am sitting tight as I believe this is just the start of something special. It's just taken longer than we all had hoped. | whatsthepoint | |
21/1/2020 10:06 | In fact PHE might have been able to do it cheaper. | tewkesbury | |
21/1/2020 09:41 | Just out of interest how come, as PHE were paying W2T £20k per month in PHE shares and could just as easily have paid the same amount in shares to those people if they had been working within PHE? | tewkesbury |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |