Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[nelson5100] 01/11/2018 11:06

Baffles me how you dispute anybody who dates to raise issues or questions about the company.

You use the same arguments as the rampers'.
Although you say you aren't invested your postings are more akin to a rampers rather than an independent poster.

You stick with your ramping and I will stick with my analysis.


As with all investments I prefer to do my own research which includes the financials.

[mrgreen1] 01/11/2018 10:36

For anyone posting negative comments constantly have an ulterior motive which we have already found out from JakNife. You are yet another one who for some reason just doesn't want this technology to help the plastic issues we face. Whether you have previously lost money from the technology that didn't work, whether you are a MM or whether you are part of the Peter Jeney party, you have an ulterior motive to not want this to be a success. Baffles me completely how you want to continue to live in a world where we have serious plastic issues but each to their own

[nelson5100] 01/11/2018 10:21

Just read my postings , far more informative for you to understand the company and its financial reporting.

[nelson5100] 01/11/2018 10:17

8402?

Attention to detail Mrgreen1?

[billthebank] 01/11/2018 10:00

It's the doomsayers I have filtered Mr G

[mrgreen1] 01/11/2018 09:57

Post 8408.Go have a read and send me a private message if you like.

[nelson5100] 01/11/2018 09:45

8402?

Attention to detail Mrgreen1?

[billthebank] 01/11/2018 08:58

Don't you just love the filter button

[mrgreen1] 01/11/2018 08:51

Post 8408..... are you another one who doesn’t actually read people’s comments? But just continues to post negatives?

[nelson5100] 01/11/2018 05:30

Mrgreen1, no I not..but you are part of the Wazzza ramping brigade desperate to get the share price up.

Oh you have fully researched this company going back to its very early days but didn't know what the reference to Wazzza was about?

My question are fact based and have highlighted the many financial reporting errors made by the company. This included forcing them to withdraw audited accounts within days of issuing them.

Why do you continually attack anybody who isn't ramping the share?

[mrgreen1] 31/10/2018 20:07

You could find out information like that if you wanted to, just pick up the phone and make a call :) it's not rocket science to pick up a phone and make a call :) You don't however want to know that because you are against the technology. You are also probably part of the Peter Jeney party.

[nelson5100] 31/10/2018 18:36

You clearly don't like questions being posted even though somebody may have the answer.

For example, if asked you would say how would anybody know that a representative of W2T is going to Japan. Yet just recently Mrgreen1 posted such information.

So instead of alway criticising others why not celebrate that question s are being asked.
Only rampers would discourage such activity.

[vatnabrekk] 31/10/2018 18:04

Clearly you're wasted on here, Nelson!

[coldspring] 31/10/2018 17:34

And another one filtered for being a tedious ball bag

[nelson5100] 31/10/2018 17:27

Vatnabrek, how do you know that I knew that you didn't know the answer to the question which I had posted?

[vatnabrekk] 31/10/2018 16:51

By the way Nelson, I think it's a fair bet that DNV GL will know the answer to that.

[vatnabrekk] 31/10/2018 16:49

Nelson, you know very well that I don't know that, and neither does anyone else unless they are "in the know" which I am not.

But then you knew all that already, so the point of your question was...what?

[nelson5100] 31/10/2018 16:44

Vatnabrek, what is the longest continuous run time for the prototype?

[top tips] 31/10/2018 16:29

Recent Director share purchases suggests management believe in it:

- 17/10/2018: Keith Allaun (CEO) 16.666 million @ 0.6p (total price £100k)
- 06/8/2018: David Ryan (Dir) 6 million @ 0.5p (total price £30k)
- 27/2/2018: James Greenstreet (Non-Exec Dir) 1 million @ 0.5632p
- 23/2/2018: Keith Allaun (CEO) 2 million @ 0.5095p

[vatnabrekk] 31/10/2018 16:22

I think it's worth stating (again) that the process that is currently working at Thornton Park is the same technology that will be used in the 25tpd unit. So based on the "mousetrap" at Thornton Park, we know that the technology works at that level, despite JakNife's protests that it doesn't work.

The main question, and probably the question that led to a great deal of the scepticism, was would it still work when scaled up to 25tpd. And this question was indeed valid given that several other systems had failed for one reason or another when scaled up to 100x or 1,000x the prototype level. First of all, PHE are not intending to scale up by a huge multiple, from a 1-3tpd unit to a 25tpd unit is not all that much considering that if you double the length of the cylinder, and also double its diameter, you will have increased its volume by a factor of 8x.

Also, and this is perhaps the main point of the verification exercise, that DNV GL have verified the technology is scalable to a 25 tpd commercial size system. So really it depends whether the sceptics now believe that DNV GL know what they are talking about, or not.

[nelson5100] 31/10/2018 16:22

Have they guaranteed their feasibilty report that the 25tpd will work?

[top tips] 31/10/2018 15:55

I think its you who is being "double jointed" but I like your analagy between the significance of PHE's DMG system and the invention of nuclear power in its day. Its made me think PHE could be worth even more now.

You need to understand the independent feasibility approval undertaken by DNV
GL (a global leader in technical assurance certification) verified the technology is scalable to a 25 tpd commercial size system with specific benefits and will meet all regulations, availability and operational demands - you seem to confuse hypothetical with feasible - its the latter that applies here now.

[steverabet] 31/10/2018 13:42

crikey top tips, you must be double jointed to have been able to contort my meaning so badly - is your head on the right way round? if you think that nuclear fusion is such a doddle, PHE shares are indeed right for you. (fusion is the process that occurs in the sun, which is a long long way from being viable, fission is the dirty dangerous system that we currently have)
whilst i am not quite as negative on PHE as jaknife(i dont dismiss the feasibility study out of hand) the facts remain that all they still have is a set of plans that now needs a grown up to engineer and build. if - and thats a rather large if - then of course there is a different scenario - and thats a long way off

[new tech] 31/10/2018 13:18

JakNife and mrgreen

Lets all agree there is a distinction between the old Pyromex system, which PHE basically bought from Mr Jeney and subsequently abandoned because after running it they felt there were certain issues (no fault of PHE); and the new G3 system, which they now call DMG, which PHE subsequently developed to replace Pyromex and with which they are now moving forward.

Any references to pre G3/DMG days are thus largely pointless.

Its what they are doing now that is important.