Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Polo Resources Limited LSE:POL London Ordinary Share VGG6844A1158 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 1.57 1.15 1.99 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 0.0 -3.3 -1.1 - 6

Polo Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 16626 to 16649 of 17375 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  671  670  669  668  667  666  665  664  663  662  661  660  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/8/2020
16:03
"Tang would be in serious breach of his duties as a Director if he has failed to disclose that he owns Dyani" It's not 'ownership' it's those with 'significant control'. Some would say he's already in serious breach of his duties as a Director. Funny how the AGM is back on the agenda at a time when the nomad has made their position clear.
glavey
03/8/2020
15:49
Accounts are historical, the NAV has been falling, the share price is voting NAV will continue to fall and the number of shares in existance will continue to rise. 888, unsurprisingly you use ridicule to avoid the point. When people do that there's generally a reason.
glavey
03/8/2020
14:28
Massive discount to NAV 😂😂😂😂 8514; 40p down to 1.56p don’t call that a discount anymore🤣 9315;🤣ԍ15;🤣
johnnyrambo1
03/8/2020
12:28
Clarity on Dyani ownership is required for confidence to be restored in Tang / Polo / GCM. A brassplate in Hong Kong is as far as I got. Then the Perfectus conflict of interest needs to be resolved.
russman
03/8/2020
11:44
You should also forward your concerns in ref fca and manipulation to the company too. Their bums may twitch a little.
apfindley
03/8/2020
11:42
Trading at a massive discount to nav, "for years"???Then clearly that nav doesn't hold water does it. You saying that polo have advanced nothing in all those years? Then the nav is meaningless really.
apfindley
03/8/2020
11:17
It isn’t misleading that Polo has for years been trading at a massive discount to NAV. That is a fact clearly shown in every report. Releasing that value into the share price is what should have attracted investors. It’s called supply and demand and if there are more buyers than sellers the share price will rise. Clearly people can form there own views on my comments as they can on yours. Your unsubstantiated serious allegations against a Director who has also had a successful career as a lawyer and is admitted as a Barrister in England is a matter of serious concern. You should be mindful of the laws of defamation and FCA regulations regarding market manipulation.
888icb
03/8/2020
11:14
So issuing shares is not raising cash then... what is it just dilution.One thing remains...nobody not a single person can tells us who dyani are, who owns them, even one person who works for them or who has worked on the phulbari project, no documents with even single persons name or what dyani have actually done which could have been done by the gcm/polo directors.It looks dodgy. Dyani looks like a shell company used to gather up 5million quids worth of gcm stock and then exchange some for polo stock too.Why would you entrust the advancement of phulbari in the hands of a newly formed companed who first claimed they had experience of simar projects (nb. not one other project has been named and any search just pulls up the gcm agreement)
apfindley
03/8/2020
10:58
Bringing new investors???? Do you mean missleading them as you are trying to do for 12 years..... Polo’s never been so low. Shows the confidence of the « investors »
johnnyrambo1
03/8/2020
10:56
I do not think it is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders for Polo and Tang to be continually attacked on this bb. How does that help our investments by allowing it to be portrayed to potential investors and existing investors as a basket case. We will never get the share price to rise unless we bring in new investors. Polo has some good investments and continues to trade a a large discount to NAV which is as disappointing to me as I am sure it is to other investors. I have said many times that I do not think Tang is without his faults and in particular I think the level of remuneration he has taken from Polo is excessive and not justifiable in any event but particularly in view of the decline in the share price However Hibiscus is a good investment and it is not Tang’s fault that there has been a global oil price crisis. He has also put great efforts into bringing GCM to a successful conclusion for approval of Phulbari. If that succeeds Polo’s fortunes will be restored as will its share price. He has done a good job of taking it forward without having to raise cash. The consultants have been paid in shares so if they don’t succeed they have effectively been working for nothing. It demonstrates their confidence in success. The end game with GCM would appear to be close but has been slightly delayed due to COVID. I just don’t think it is in anyone’s best interest to try to remove Tang at this point in time and risk destabilising GCM. The people trying to remove him do not have a plan that has been disclosed to anyone as to what would happen if Tang was removed. We need people to be constructive in their comments not destructive.
888icb
03/8/2020
10:38
Hi Alpal Hopefully some positive news soon. It’s been a very long time Hope you and your family are well There are so many trolls on here We did have some fun on this board I still hold all my original holding. If I get any news I will private message you through advfn Take care Maureenx
spights
03/8/2020
10:25
hello Mo! Not heard from you for some time. We have all lost money on Polo in the intervening period. I accept from you that 888 is a genuine investor. But none of the other Polo shareholders are as happy about Tang's lack of performance as 888. Just maybe 888 is 'short' POL and therefore very happy for tang to continue wasting our money.
alpal2
03/8/2020
10:11
Alpal 888 is a genuine investor here and not a troll Or anything to do with Tang I can confirm that
spights
03/8/2020
09:58
Cannot imagine why 888 is so defensive about Tang unless he is Tang or paid by Tang out of tang's excessive salary. Do Tang's duties as a director not include looking after the interests of all shareholders? Over the last many years the only shareholder tang has looked after is himself. Unless 888 is Tang he must be losing a large portion of his investment; so why defend tang? Oh, well; we all just lost another 20% of our investment value in Polo today. And all because the Nomad expects ethical behaviour from the directors of Polo.
alpal2
03/8/2020
09:56
Some details on dyani https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=1323-14595430-0JF7D57R58H10E9GP9DL7NLE34
spights
03/8/2020
09:25
Its just a question 888.Theres no information about Dyani, which is odd for a company doing what dyani are supposedly doing for gcm.Its as if they dont want anyone to know who owns Dyani, or even who works for them.
apfindley
03/8/2020
09:23
Don’t worry your tiny brain it will bounce back when the new Nomad is announced if not before. Now run along and substantiate your Dyani allegations.
888icb
03/8/2020
09:00
😂😂😂😂 8514; listen to johnney last trade 1.56p plummeted
johnnyrambo1
03/8/2020
08:26
If your accusations/speculations were true then Tang would be in serious breach of his duties as a Director if he has failed to disclose that he owns Dyani. You should be very careful about making serious allegations on a public forum if you can’t substantiate it, which you can’t.
888icb
03/8/2020
08:14
Who owns dyani corp?Is Tang the mysterious owner of the shell dyani ?Was it created to be paid in gcm shares for services which the gcm directors could've done themselves?Why was so much paid to dyani for services which cant be even verified, and no record of anyone who works for them?Why do dyani claim to have a history of previous large similar projects, but nothing except this gcm project can be traced to them?
apfindley
03/8/2020
08:01
In the same way as I am caused to wonder when Glavey turns up on this bb if he isn’t just another of the multiple identities of Apfindley/Johnnyrambo.
888icb
03/8/2020
05:04
In the same way as I am caused to wonder why it took so long for Allenby to resign I am equally caused to wonder if 888 actually has a long term position (or any position for that matter) in Polo.
glavey
02/8/2020
22:22
Yes yes 888FT Everybody believes in your 12 years BS
johnnyrambo1
02/8/2020
16:17
You would think Strand Hanson were the obvious choice unless there would be a conflict due to the close links between the 2 companies. But they would certainly be aware of all the issues so would require minimal adddue diligence. Let’s see if they can sort this quickly if they haven’t already.
888icb
Chat Pages: Latest  671  670  669  668  667  666  665  664  663  662  661  660  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
POL
Polo Resou..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200928 23:58:10