We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petrel Resources Plc | LSE:PET | London | Ordinary Share | IE0001340177 | ORD EUR0.0125 (CDI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.00 | 1.90 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 124,648 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs | 0 | -311k | -0.0020 | -10.00 | 3.14M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/10/2020 22:08 | Awful BB!!! | smcl | |
05/10/2020 17:50 | Someone obviously has a problem with their brokers account! | 1teemore | |
05/10/2020 17:48 | The Chairman Elect - August 2020 lolz ... | lippe | |
05/10/2020 17:33 | "Paid de rampers" Lolz Gets uncomfortable when people challenge your perception of reality.... Ignore anything posted here by the so call "De rampers" just look at the history of Teeling and Horgans listed companies... look at the charts... look at your stockbroker account... read the RNS'S released by the company. What does that tell you ? | exile | |
05/10/2020 17:07 | Agree but with C-19 a job is a job [if you really need one] | the chairman elect | |
05/10/2020 17:02 | 'cause they are PAID de-rampers [just ask JT & DH] | the chairman elect | |
05/10/2020 16:17 | The question is elmfield why do they keep bothering to post? | bountyfull | |
05/10/2020 15:40 | They love getting things wrong, IQ not very high, Poor things. | elmfield | |
05/10/2020 15:39 | Don't worry, be happy (5 minutes ago) | lippe | |
05/10/2020 15:31 | Nice kd as always. | palace pete | |
05/10/2020 13:54 | Due diligence, right you are Rupert ... | lippe | |
05/10/2020 13:50 | The liquidation of PNB Banka is disputed at the European Court of Justice. Note that the PNB Banka Administrator believes that "the previous management of the bank is to blame for such actions". The administrator is suing the previous management for the EUR 32million - not the new Tamraz shareholder group. If anyone is worried that the above dispute endangers Netoil's continued aim of gaining control of Petrel and then putting their assets into the company, then no need to be (1 hour ago :"No worries") | kdickson | |
05/10/2020 13:30 | We need that oil law to be passed by Parliament, BB. If that can be passed before the conference in two weeks time, then we might see people taking a position in anticipation of the award of our contract. The details of which should now have been agreed. I believe that the Iraqi PM is in Paris before the conference too. | the sage | |
05/10/2020 13:26 | "lithological heterogeneities 5 Oct '20 - 12:38 - 17588 of 17588 "Finally set to deliver ?" But they didn't say if it was between 0600-1200 or 1200-1800. Just how long am I supposed to wait ?" Although they say that past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future..... ...... Forever ? | fenners66 | |
05/10/2020 12:38 | "Finally set to deliver ?"But they didn't say if it was between 0600-1200 or 1200-1800.Just how long am I supposed to wait ? | lithological heterogeneities | |
05/10/2020 12:15 | Ken thanks for your posts hopefully will get something from the October Iraqi Oil and Gas Exhibition GLA | bigbudda | |
05/10/2020 08:54 | " all these deadlines have passed and nothing has been paid, there is no security. " but that was in Europe , couldn't possibly happen here.... | fenners66 | |
05/10/2020 08:16 | Lippe-MK2 Copied and pasted 13619 on the "Rose Tinted Spectacles" thread, hope you don't mind ? | exile | |
05/10/2020 08:14 | From the "Dark Side" for those who dare not venture there... The administrator of ‘PNB banka’ will sue the former management of the bank for 32 million euros October 5, 2020 Vigo Krastiņš, the administrator of the insolvent “PNB banka”, will go to court with a claim of 32 million euros against the former board and council of the bank for the losses caused to the bank, the Latvian Television program “De facto” reported. The administrator asked the nine former members of the board and council of PNB banka to jointly and severally recover the losses incurred by the credit institution shortly before its suspension with decisions that simultaneously relieved the former owner of the bank and chairman of the council Grigory Guseļņikov Among the defendants are both Guselnikov himself and his deputy, former Danish Prime Minister and NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, and a member of the council, former head of Germany’s foreign intelligence service, August Hanning. The other six defendants are Peter Michael Odintsov, a former member of the Supervisory Board of PNB Bank, and Oliver Ronald Bramwell, Anna Verbicka, Natalia Ignatiev, Dmitry Kalmikov and Alexei Kutyavin. The court has already decided to seize the property of Rasmussen and Hanning, the program reported. The losses suffered by PNB banka are related to transactions between the bank and a group of investors led by Roger Tamraz, a US citizen, which Guselnikov presented as the new owners of the bank before the closure of the bank. As stated a year ago European Central Bank (ECB) and later the insolvency administrator of PNB banka, the bank ‘s rescuers did not pay their money for the bank’ s shares, but even managed to borrow for their own expenses from PNB banka. “The issuance of loans to the same new so-called shareholders did not comply with the requirements of the law. Given that they are recognized as related parties, there had to be a unanimous decision by the board to grant the loan. There was no such decision, but the loan was nonetheless Of course, there is no payment for these loans, there is no collateral, “the bank administrator explained to the program. However, this loan of EUR 559 861 to the new owners of PNB banka was negligible compared to the decisions of EUR 31,468,997 made by the bank’s management shortly before the closure of PNB banka. The program is known from several sources that the new shareholders of the bank have received shares from Guseļņikov “These new shareholders, when entering the bank and concluding transactions with the bank and the shareholder, have agreed that they will both secure and pay their payment obligation. At the moment, all these deadlines have passed and nothing has been paid, there is no security. Accordingly, we believe that the previous management of the bank is to blame for such actions, “said the administrator Krastiņš, who last year went to court against the new owners of the bank. De facto also reported that last year, shortly before the suspension of PNB banka, its transactions were announced State police (VP), but the Economic Crime Control Board did not consider it necessary to initiate criminal proceedings. Author of the application – The Financial and Capital Market Commission (FCMC) – the decision of the police not to initiate the investigation has not been appealed. Gvido Romeiko, director of the FCMC’s Legal and Licensing Department, confirmed to the program that last year the authority applied to the police to “assess how these transactions with the entry of new shareholders have taken place”, but due to secrecy he refused to comment on the police inspection and explain why did not contest. The LP explained to the program that the investigation had not been opened because no criminal offense had been identified during the inspection. The banking regulator agrees that a civil claim against the former management of the bank against the administrator of PNB banka could be justified. “From our point of view, yes, such a claim seems justified. But we do not know the other party’s arguments. In civil cases, this adversarial principle takes place, both parties show their evidence, it is analyzed, and in the end the judge has a heavy duty to decide who is right. “commented Romeiko. According to De Facto, in more than 30 million damages cases, the court agreed to seize the apartments and houses of several defendants, including property worth more than 700,000 euros in Denmark owned by former vice-chairman Rasmussen and a house owned by council member Haning in Germany. Both of them also have their shares seized. The former owner of the bank, Guselnikov, officially owns almost nothing, except for shares in a Cypriot company worth six euros. These assets would not be enough to recover the losses caused to the bank in case of a favorable judgment. Neither Guselnikov nor Rasmussen nor Hanings responded to De facto ‘s request for comment on the proceedings. As reported, the operation of “PNB banka” was suspended on August 15, 2019, but on September 12, the Vidzeme Suburb Court of the City of Riga declared “PNB banka” insolvent. PNB banka was suspended in order to prevent the bank from flowing out. On 15 August 2019, the ECB, as the direct supervisor of PNB banka, decided to recognize PBN banka as a financial institution in financial difficulties, while the Single European Resolution Board decided not to liquidate PNB banka, which means not to measures to stabilize the bank. In view of the above, the FCMC decided to suspend the provision of financial services to “PNB banka” and decided on the unavailability of deposits. The ECB, as the direct supervisor of PNB Bank, took such a decision, finding that the bank had not complied with regulatory requirements and assessing the bank’s financial situation. According to the bank’s annual report for 2019, Guselnikov, who previously directly and indirectly owned 95.97% of the bank’s shares, now owns 23.47% of PNB banka’s shares, while the other shareholders own a total of 76.53% of the shares, but each individually less than 10%. The bank’s shareholders include Tamraz, Antoine Baclini, Dolly Huri, George Mgalobishvili, Mark Jeanlu D’Ombr, Michel Fayyad, Nikolai Paskalayev and Said Meraik. | exile | |
05/10/2020 08:09 | Wakey ! Wakey Guys ! Time to put on the rose tinted spectacles and start creating your own reality again !!! I wonder what delusional offerings will be posted this week ? La La La La La !!! Dooby Dooby Doo !!!! | exile | |
05/10/2020 07:19 | ".... acquiring shares without paying for them" Surely not ? What company , especially a say a quoted company , where shares are a marketable asset, allow someone to have shares without paying for them , for say 90 days or some such ? Unheard of surely? Oh wait a minute...... | fenners66 | |
05/10/2020 04:28 | Nothing to see here .... how does the loan amount compare to the tranche 1 share costs? .... acquiring shares without paying for them .... court cases, how many is that now? .... I hope it doesn’t affect the Iraqi PM meeting or the new license awards in Iraq. .... I’m sure it is not important that the biggest shareholders have a few very minor issues | lippe_mk2 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions