Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Paysafe Gp LSE:PAYS London Ordinary Share GB0034264548 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 590.00 589.00 590.00 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial 416.3 8.0 1.4 393.2 2,881

Paysafe Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10151 to 10173 of 10475 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  407  406  405  404  403  402  401  400  399  398  397  396  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/9/2017
10:29
@aspex - I think budco are doing exactly what they tried with the BOD - low ball offer a few times before they get serious....which is fine we can wait. The silence from ii's is very telling, if Budco had them onside they would be shouting from the roof tops - I suspect we will see this defeated and immediately come back with a higher offer. It is a long shot I know - but I would love PENN to come back and vote yes to OLG in the interim - that would really put the cat amongst the pigeons and force a real value bid !! IMHO
wolfhound1
18/9/2017
09:35
Can we presume that Bidco is having to work very hard on the IIs before the meeting next week?And if the IIs have any sense, are they collaborating to get a best result for all?
aspex
18/9/2017
08:47
Yes a massive proportion of my investments is in PAYS. I am high conviction when I invest so I don't have many holdings. I have been mostly lucky with this style apart from HUR (which I think will be good eventually) where I am currently 32% down.
johnhelme2704
17/9/2017
18:38
Impressive that people here have 50,000 shares. That adds up to a pretty penny
trentendboy
17/9/2017
15:22
Still a remote hope for PA re US OLG: HTTPS://www.playusa.com/pennsylvania-budget-online-gambling/ Any approval could kick-off the next wave, which would turbo charge JL/CVC Budco's ill gotten gains over the next 3 - 5 years if they can successfully ditch long-standing shareholders at £5.90 a share.....
lomax99
15/9/2017
15:24
@john - 40% of the shares are in the hands of pi's
ralphmalph
15/9/2017
15:23
I would not surprise me if they are trying to work out how many pi's have voted or are not voting. If 80% of pi's do not vote it means the ii's have more influence.
ralphmalph
15/9/2017
14:50
what concerns me is how close they must be to getting 75% if they think it worthwhile ringing us PIs who, with the greatest respect, have piddlingly small amount of shares compare to IIs...I voted no with my 50,000. I am with Hargreaves Lansdowne who were great, and Alliance Trust who were not (but managed to muddle thru in the end)
johnhelme2704
15/9/2017
11:54
Just voted no for both Sipp & isa accounts. Have also sold 30% before this.
seans66
15/9/2017
11:27
I hold PAYS across five different accounts - SIPP, ISAs and Dealing - with four different brokers. AJ Bell win the "how easy to vote" competition hands down with a proactive invitation to an electronic vote for EGM and separately the Court action. The rest - iii, SVS and X-O - are, in my opinion, range from poor to appalling - typically no communication that there has even been a bid - with the lowest end of the scale wanting £20 plus VAT for each holding before they vote "No" on my behalf. And getting that info out of them took three emails! I believe the bid undervalues the company, so much so I topped up at 576p after the approach hit the news and the price dipped. I am heartened that, if true, they are phoning PIs to try and get to 75%. Sitting tight and awaiting a more realistic price that is not so opportunistic after manipulative shorting shenanigans through much of 2017. End of rant.
ledurts
15/9/2017
08:21
Voted against all resolutions
corrientes
15/9/2017
07:44
Have used HL and Barclays for years and have never received a phone call from a third party.
johnv
15/9/2017
07:38
Section 793 is not Takeover Code but Companies Act and is designed to enable a company, PAYS in this case, to determine who is acquiring an interest in the company to make a raid on the company. It seems perverse that laws designed to protect companies from predatory take over are being used by the company to assist a predatory acquirer namely Bidco acting agaist the shareholders interest.
slogsweep
15/9/2017
07:34
Thanks Wolf , Slogs , If Bidco are targeting PIs then i can only assume they think the vote must be very close !!!! Barclays is now the only one i have not been able to vote with.
oohrogerpalmer
15/9/2017
07:21
Got an answer from AJ Bell regarding Bidco phone call Apparently they admit to giving Bidco my address under section 793 (of the TO code I suppose)which they claim they are obliged to do, but not my phone no. (which they can get from BT as I am not xD) Apparently Bidco is entitled to my address as they may be interested in buying my shares I suppose this request from Bidco is unrelated to my voting they seem to be targeting all PI's with a lobbing campaign
slogsweep
14/9/2017
08:59
Called Barclays 8am and got straight through, bit of ferreting around as they found the action details, then recorded my No vote. 5 mins max. K.
kramch
14/9/2017
06:37
I sold half my holding at just under 600 but I'm considering buying more today. No situation is risk free as anything can happen but this is as close as it gets. I don't mind tying up a little capital for the chance of a higher bid but with 590 reasonably certain.
jgoold
13/9/2017
18:30
26.09.17. is less than 2 weeks away so sit tight, we are in a win win situation.
slaccs
13/9/2017
16:25
Thought they had until April on this even if offer is rejected !! That being the case they could sit and do nothing for 6 months whilst the share price stays where it is. If i have read notices right , perhaps someone can confirm that.
oohrogerpalmer
13/9/2017
14:58
If the offer is rejected , I thought there was a time limit of say 6 months where they could not do another offer. If not then they would constantly be pestering with higher and higher offers.
johnv
13/9/2017
14:56
Exactly , it could be that 590p is the final offer. That's why the Bod's and OM have accepted and why they are chasing pi's. Time will tell.
oohrogerpalmer
13/9/2017
14:53
@rogerp - not at 590p its not - and here is why : 1. ii's are still increasing their long position at 580's - they wouldn't be buying only to sell at 590p - that just tie up capital for weeks for little or no return. They will be looking for 15-25+% return 2. If budco had more ii's on board they would say so - it might influence pi's ( who hold the balance of power to get over 75% ) not to bother getting involved 3. why are pi's being called ( allegedly - but I have no reason to doubt posters) by budco reps asking what way they will vote - if it was in the bag you wouldn't be doing that ? 4. Another bidder - might yet appear - as suggested they would probably leave it til right before the Court meeting. IMHO budco are negotiating behind the scenes with ii's and are being told they need to offer a higher price. Budco might be prepared for several rounds of this Just like they did with the BOD - several low ball bids then come back with higher one. No reason to believe they will change their strategy now they are going to investors.... if fact we should add a 20% premium each time they try it !!! As PAYS own research shows in next 2-3 yrs our market is growing exponentially so we would be far better off without Budco !!
wolfhound1
13/9/2017
14:49
If Bidco are going to the trouble of trying to find out how private investors are going to vote, it implies to me it's not all done and dusted i.e. they haven't got 75% of ii owned shares in favour.
largeronald
Chat Pages: Latest  407  406  405  404  403  402  401  400  399  398  397  396  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
PAYS
Paysafe
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20201124 20:59:21