Partygaming Share Discussion Threads

[marko1961] 07/3/2011 12:46

lol yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[choktaw] 07/3/2011 09:13

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[marko1961] 07/3/2011 09:12

choktaw tut tut cant we have fun anymore ??????????

[choktaw] 07/3/2011 08:47

marko

Well done on your short,but don't get carried away because this is just a short term retreat and it certainly is not the best short in this market.

Stop posing childish messages and keep more of eye on your stop loss!!

[marko1961] 07/3/2011 08:39

best short u will get in this market

[marko1961] 07/3/2011 08:29

cmon baby keep going south yippeeeee

[bleepy] 05/3/2011 09:52

"Nobody should be faulting New Jersey online gambling interests, Lesniak included. After all, it is the action in New Jersey that is now accelerating efforts on both the state and federal front."

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 17:00

RNS Number : 3918C
PartyGaming Plc
04 March 2011





4 March 2011
PartyGaming Plc
("PartyGaming" or the "Company")

PartyGaming Plc Shares Trust - Purchase of 1.1 million PartyGaming Shares

PartyGaming announces that the PartyGaming Plc Shares Trust (the "Trust") has today purchased 1,100,000 PartyGaming ordinary shares of 0.015 pence each (the "Shares") at an average price of 192.93 pence per share. Funds to carry out this purchase were gifted to the Trust by the Company and these Shares will be used to satisfy share awards made in accordance with the Company's remuneration policy.

As a result of this purchase, the Trust holds 5,094,588 Shares, representing 1.23% of the Company's issued share capital. The Trust has waived its voting rights in respect of the Shares it holds. Therefore, excluding these Shares from the 413,065,372 Shares in issue, there are 407,970,784 voting rights for the purposes of determining if shareholders are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in, PartyGaming under the FSA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 15:46

This has been posted prior,hope it helps,btw,they had us all confused.The veto is being called a soft option veto whereby the electorate of NJ will vote via referendum.

*There was extreme confusion leading up to the offical press release. Initially, the veto was supposed to have been a "conditional" one in which the state legislature would be able to make necessary amendments, then return the bill to Christie for a signature within 10 days of receipt. The bill was S490 and earlier in the day was posted as a "conditional veto" then changed over to "absolute veto". It was not immediately clear what caused this confusion.

[jezza123] 04/3/2011 14:24

hmm these later articles are contradictory to earlier articles Bleepy -

yesterday the report was that Christies veto was conditional, but the ones you and others have posted say that it was unconditional? So which is it??

[nellie1973] 04/3/2011 13:58

Broker update to neutral

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 13:56

Barney Frank Pushes for new Federal Law for Internet Gambling

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 13:53

Senate Committee Moves Online Gambling Bill Forward In Iowa

[jezza123] 04/3/2011 10:42

My sentiment is that Christie's decision reflects on-going negotiations with the Federal authorities and it buys a bit more time - but the fact that he hasn't vetoed it outright has got to be bullish....

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 10:10

Lesniak pledges to bring bill back to Governor's desk

[marko1961] 04/3/2011 09:41

SRPARCTIVE had to go out just got back in now aint closed it watching very close for my oppertunity

[srpactive] 04/3/2011 08:49

bleepy/adi

good posts.

I bought in just before the close, which was
a bit hairy but ok so far.

Bleepy

The US needs the revenue.

dyor

regards

active

[adieadie] 04/3/2011 08:43

that short isnt looking too good :) nice try though, seemed a logical way to punt it, but I think the next downward move will come on any bad regulatory news from europe, such news could send the share price into the sub pound mark.

longer term I think this will be a good performer and will see the likes of 5-6 quid.

[bleepy] 04/3/2011 08:41

Other US states proposing to regulate online poker will no doubt take on board NJ's comments and ammend where necessary to ensure smooth passage.

The Fed's ongoing investigation into payment processors and other avenues need speedy resolution.They then can produce a bill to regulate online poker that would be better suited to maximise player liquidity and revenue.There is news of a federal bill being introduced later this month with Barney Frank as co-sponsor.

Whichever way it goes BPTY are well placed to benefit.

[srpactive] 04/3/2011 08:12

blue based on bsl, shorts closing
after the panic yesterday.