We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parkwood Hldgs. | LSE:PKW | London | Ordinary Share | GB0006816549 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 41.50 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/7/2008 06:34 | I like the Trading statement! | dpmcq | |
03/7/2008 20:26 | More share buybacks, they don't appear in the trades screenso I can only think they have a willing seller and not buying in the open markets. Anyone know any different? | dpmcq | |
02/7/2008 15:13 | I've been quite surprised by the stability in the price over recent weeks, particularly when other similar companies have fallen significantly. Given the (now) relatively high valuation and less attractive yield, I've sold my holding today, as I think there are going to be some very attractive crisis plays coming up soon. Cheers, Steve. | stevemarkus | |
02/7/2008 10:08 | Parkwood cancelled 375,000 shares yesterday which will help the eps in future. | poyntona | |
19/6/2008 10:56 | By any standards, this is a really quiet thread! Are there no serious holders? I hold a modest number of shares, as I am convinced about the longer term prospects for the company. However, in this current melt-down climate, I find it really puzzling that PKW share price frequently seems to be trying very hard to push upwards against a background of falling price trends elsewhere. It seems determined to break through the 123p-ish ceiling. Yet, I can see nothing special in the released news. Does anyone else have any info to share. PIM | petersinthemarket | |
07/5/2008 21:34 | I wondered about that point myself POYNTONA. If they could, why have they not done so already? | mistertibbs | |
02/5/2008 09:19 | Hopefully higher turnover will lead to a lot bigger profits. Does anyone know if Parkwood can just wind up the patient transport business once the existing contracts finish? If they could get rid of this then the share price would go up 50%. | poyntona | |
10/3/2008 23:54 | I definitely get the feeling that taking the Co off the market is on the agenda. Hence perhaps the almost deliberately vague comments throughout the results. I think you've summed it up well aj - this is one of the most frustrating shares I've invested in, so much potential yet so little realised. Sold most of mine today - better prospects elsewhere. | penpont | |
10/3/2008 21:08 | Not sure what to make of these results at all. And prospects look uninspiring. A case of sit tight or what. Time needed to ponder that one. Then again, maybe not. Are they considering going private? Future strategy? Details other than what looks like a full order book for 2008 are thin on the ground. Why, I wonder? | mistertibbs | |
10/3/2008 11:23 | just broken support - chart not looking good at all | brando69 | |
10/3/2008 11:21 | penpoint, I am not sure what they mean. Is margin getting worse? Or are they looking to change strategy, e.g. to make the business atrractive for a sale. Perhaps they are really worried about the economic outlook and want to wait until it improves before taking on any more debt. Also, I note that the comments in the January trading statement that 2008 will not be so bad for Healthcare were not repeated in today's results. MJ | mjcrockett | |
10/3/2008 09:19 | Can anyone work out what exactly Parkwood are trying to say in the outlook statement? | penpont | |
14/1/2008 21:25 | Couldn't agree more with both comments. Would like to see them enter the golf market in my homeland, Scotland now we moved up here now. Falkirk may not however, be the best place to start that, more like Ayrshire down near Troon or further up north, possibly even as north as Aberdeen. Join up with Mr Trump up there. | mistertibbs | |
10/1/2008 09:32 | Once the lossmaking healthcare contract is gone, this will look better! 2009 and 2010 will benefit. Agree it looks a good long term investment. Some exposure to retail customer in the health and fitness segment, though mostly I believe they just operate facilities, so effects should be limited and over the shorter term. Otherwise, lots of positives, with growth in t/o and Glendale nicely positioned. | edmundshaw | |
10/1/2008 09:09 | Wakey wakey. Trading ahead, turnover up 14%, order book up 32%. Good earnings visibility surely make this a good long term investment. | deadly | |
07/1/2008 13:53 | I suggest it was shares previously purchased in the market and held in treasury have now been cancelled. Suggests to me they may have been considering for use in a purchase or even an incentive. Who knows | mistertibbs | |
21/12/2007 12:11 | I gather todays announcement regarding cancelling treasury shares is the same as a share buy back. Is that correct? | poyntona | |
14/12/2007 09:24 | looks like it may break 120 on this move - lets see what happens | daza70 | |
05/11/2007 17:50 | New deal looks o.k. if profits are as they have said and it is a growing business. Is landscaping they way to go though? When I first bought this share they had a landscape division that was loss making and was being sold. This gave a big boost to profits. I just hope this isn't the same. The autumn Park wood News has just arrived. There doesn't look to be a lot happening at the moment. i.e new contracts. | poyntona | |
11/9/2007 08:07 | results are disappointing if the share price was 150p! | taffee | |
11/9/2007 07:40 | in line for the year is a fair enough result, and now we know pts is to be sold it is worth holding on - probably a good time to buy given its well below the 150p highs - bit more director buying might help as well | its the oxman | |
11/9/2007 07:36 | The results are generally disappointing even considering the patient transport losses. The only good news is that if they can get rid of that dept. it will give a big boost to profits. | poyntona | |
11/9/2007 06:25 | RE THE BELOW - THIS WILL HELP A LOT ONCE PTS IS SOLD With losses continuing in the Patient Transport Services (PTS) business of Parkwood Healthcare as a result of ongoing difficulties with a contract with North Staffordshire University Hospital Trust, a review of the business took place after the managing director left at the end of February and negotiations are underway to sell this part of the Parkwood Healthcare business. The Nursing Agency section of Parkwood Healthcare is performing well in London and the Bishop's Stortford office has moved to new premises. Market research has indicated that new opportunities exist in the healthcare market and the opening up of general medical service provision to social enterprises, charities and the private sector may present opportunities for Parkwood Healthcare for the future. Overall the business made a loss of #0.39 million (2006: loss #0.12 million) on revenue of #3.09 million (2006: #2.79 million) in the period. | zipstuck |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions