Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[probabilityofsuccess] 27/1/2022 09:00

Most do Johnswan, it’s just some (e.g. you) conflate the CB position with the ‘78p effect’, promulgate a theory and then, following peer review, when a wider audience become aware of the facts/evidence the ‘theory’ is proven incorrect and no longer has any basis……………perhaps?

EDIT: absolutely nothing wrong with a theory by the way, it’s just best to get it peer reviewed and wait for a consensus view as opposed to going nap on being correct with so much certainty that makes it look like one isn’t open-minded 😀

[johnswan193] 27/1/2022 08:50

Seems some of you simply don't have the mental capacity to understand the 78p effect.

[rideacockhorse] 27/1/2022 08:45

Intothewild, how can you have the sheer audacity to come on here and say that, when only two days ago you posted this: "Its impressive that you are unable to see this cap-effect in play, Scot. Its right there. Right there to see. Open your eyes. If this was the Matrix (which it sort of is) all I would see is the entire market thinking the number 78. But its not the Matrix, its reality. Yet I can still see it in all recent trades, movements and decisions. 78. Seems you and Winner somehow cannot."

I have to tell you sunshine, it's as plain as plain can be for everyone on this BB that Scot, Winner and others were proved 100% right - again!

Johnswan193 tried obfuscation yesterday to dig himself out of his hole when he said 78p wasn't a cap, more a 'magnet'. In a posting career littered with misinterpretations and misjudgements that comment was his 'magnet' opus. This post is yours.

[pro_s2009] 27/1/2022 08:22

A retest of 94p is on the cards soon imo.

[ottoman1453] 27/1/2022 08:20

For the present time and indeed the foreseeable future, Pantheon will surely be following a path guided not by wider market sentiment but it's own particular projects, which all now appear to be lining up, ready to be brought to fruition in one form or another.

[forwood] 27/1/2022 08:16

Am pleasantly surprised, given I am still heavily invested here. When I posted, S&P futures were down 40 pts from here and the ftse was off 150 pts.

[sirmark] 27/1/2022 08:16

A push and break of the 84p should get a retest of the 94p

[winner66] 27/1/2022 07:43

Forwood , inflationary management along with stimulus pull back caused an initial overreacted market. But it’s no surprise that a March interest rate hike in the US was / is going to happen. PANR will continue its steady rise in my opinion , we have a micro event and the only macro relevant will be the prevailing oil price once we are selling it. Today will be a great day .

[forwood] 27/1/2022 04:00

Well, the Fed has managed to knock 3.5% off the S&P, quite an achievement. I doubt the ftse will be a pretty sight today or that PANR will be immune.

[jontyfromsa] 27/1/2022 01:04

Million Dollar Question
Two great days in a row
What price do people think this share reaches pre drill results?

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 23:49

There is no need to remind me of any oath, I have respect for the code, not for you. Being honest and trustworthy are important to me, whereas they are very obviously not important to you.

[scot126] 26/1/2022 23:39

Sigh.....just not true. I had to prompt johnswan193 to fulfil his undertaking, an undertaking he had forgotten about as soon as he received my private info.

You're still not released from that oath, johnswan193.

You are one helluva freak. Fact. Who the hell plays all these psychological games with people. Weirdo stalker.

The Guild's time has come, folks. I'd gently suggest becoming members prior to the data arriving from the tundra because you're not going to be reading any interpretation from the likes of Tele, Darcon, Rabito79 and I after that. swendab1 will walk you through it if you're interested in joining.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 22:28

LOL, you must have been one of the conspiracy theorists to warrant that sort of message Chris. Doesn’t surprise me given like Scot you have failed to abide by the privacy code. But don’t worry, I won’t reveal what you said to me.

Edit: Yep I was right about him being a conspiracy theorist. That particular exchange began with him suggesting I was a “confirmed shorter” on this BB, despite no prior public or private interactions with him, which led to my (appropriate) off-board DM, which was a private invitation to explain himself.

Don’t forget, I am known for my respect of the privacy code, which is why Scot chose me as the person he wished to relay confidential information to last year. That information remained private, however he didn’t like that I refused to make certain statements back to the BB in the precise way he wanted me to, (I.e. he wrote something he wanted me to write on the BB as though I had written it myself) which led to his campaign against me. He also quoted certain DMs I had sent to him on this BB knowing I would not do the same in retaliation. That should tell you everything you need to know about Scot.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 22:14

Nah, I wish you the best Sirmark, you’ve shown some very big balls here and nailed your flag to the mast so I hope it pays off for you.

P.S. go back to 23-July on your private messages. That was our most recent exchange and I’m sure you’ll agree it had a respectful tone to it.

[chris0805] 26/1/2022 20:59

Not sure about a swan but you are a true coq

[mike290] 26/1/2022 20:46

Hi Scot...,

As the closing "bid" price was 81.1 pence this evening, thankyou for taking the time to explain why the idea of a 78p cap was complete nonsense and urging us to completely ignore johnswan's posts on the subject.

Fortunately, I had no doubt that johnswan... and a couple of others were talking complete rubbish anyway.

To me, johnswan..., is an empty barrel who is ego-bound to give opinions (on any subject whether he knows anything about it or not) because of a compulsion to be heard.

I haven't read his posts for quite a while but I can sometimes gather what his often deliberately misleading, self-serving, worthless (no basis) opinions are from other posters.

Regards and Good Luck.

[sirmark] 26/1/2022 20:46

Chessman I know all about tlw I was long £1.65 quite heavy trying to catch the bounce started to make money on the Friday and Monday that RNS hit and wham down to 40's can't say I wasn't sweating lol but as with everything love to fight another day. I would like to point out the invest till the end isn't a strategy I take normally, it's a Panr unique situation as the want to sell and move on and waiting a year or two to make substantial money works as apposed to jist investing ... In life tomorrows never guaranteed but I'm sure I can live out until pan sells rather than waiting for long term stocks to finally mature till the point of making life changing sums Gl all

[chessman2] 26/1/2022 20:35

sirmark - 21568. Your strategy sounds good but it may not always work as I had the same plan with Tullow oil.

The ceo left but I decided to stay with the board till the end. I still hold them!!

[probabilityofsuccess] 26/1/2022 20:20

Hi johnswan - for the benefit of those individuals who want to believe that your posts are intended to help you challenge your own thinking/broaden your understanding of the downside risks, perhaps you could give 3 or 4 examples of where insight from another poster has identified a downside risk that you hadn’t already considered and the value that those posts added for your own investment thesis in PANR? Thanks.

[scot126] 26/1/2022 19:58

Dunce's cap johnswan193, post #21574.

"Upside case is easy to make for any share."

This is absolute codswallop. I'm shaking my head at the ignorance and patent inexperience of the solo stalker. No better evidence of Pinnacle Boy's complete lack of front office training or experience.

"Downside case is easy to make for any share. The answer is always 0p." (banal but closer to practical considerations)

Simple-minded gibberish. Embarrassing for a supposed professional. Go on HD, defend swan's inane comment above from post #21574. And while you're at it, using your long-lost analytical skills, why not tell him that the market is incorrectly pricing the upside risks *using all historically accepted and traditional sector metrics* and as laid out recently by Canaccord?

[padamster] 26/1/2022 19:48

Swan you seem to project and take out of context my messages. My point was that most if not all investors who hold a stock and want it to go up would not continuously post negative comments on their own holdings.