Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[sirmark] 27/1/2022 08:16

A push and break of the 84p should get a retest of the 94p

[winner66] 27/1/2022 07:43

Forwood , inflationary management along with stimulus pull back caused an initial overreacted market. But it’s no surprise that a March interest rate hike in the US was / is going to happen. PANR will continue its steady rise in my opinion , we have a micro event and the only macro relevant will be the prevailing oil price once we are selling it. Today will be a great day .

[forwood] 27/1/2022 04:00

Well, the Fed has managed to knock 3.5% off the S&P, quite an achievement. I doubt the ftse will be a pretty sight today or that PANR will be immune.

[jontyfromsa] 27/1/2022 01:04

Million Dollar Question
Two great days in a row
What price do people think this share reaches pre drill results?

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 23:49

There is no need to remind me of any oath, I have respect for the code, not for you. Being honest and trustworthy are important to me, whereas they are very obviously not important to you.

[scot126] 26/1/2022 23:39

Sigh.....just not true. I had to prompt johnswan193 to fulfil his undertaking, an undertaking he had forgotten about as soon as he received my private info.

You're still not released from that oath, johnswan193.

You are one helluva freak. Fact. Who the hell plays all these psychological games with people. Weirdo stalker.

The Guild's time has come, folks. I'd gently suggest becoming members prior to the data arriving from the tundra because you're not going to be reading any interpretation from the likes of Tele, Darcon, Rabito79 and I after that. swendab1 will walk you through it if you're interested in joining.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 22:28

LOL, you must have been one of the conspiracy theorists to warrant that sort of message Chris. Doesn’t surprise me given like Scot you have failed to abide by the privacy code. But don’t worry, I won’t reveal what you said to me.

Edit: Yep I was right about him being a conspiracy theorist. That particular exchange began with him suggesting I was a “confirmed shorter” on this BB, despite no prior public or private interactions with him, which led to my (appropriate) off-board DM, which was a private invitation to explain himself.

Don’t forget, I am known for my respect of the privacy code, which is why Scot chose me as the person he wished to relay confidential information to last year. That information remained private, however he didn’t like that I refused to make certain statements back to the BB in the precise way he wanted me to, (I.e. he wrote something he wanted me to write on the BB as though I had written it myself) which led to his campaign against me. He also quoted certain DMs I had sent to him on this BB knowing I would not do the same in retaliation. That should tell you everything you need to know about Scot.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 22:14

Nah, I wish you the best Sirmark, you’ve shown some very big balls here and nailed your flag to the mast so I hope it pays off for you.

P.S. go back to 23-July on your private messages. That was our most recent exchange and I’m sure you’ll agree it had a respectful tone to it.

[chris0805] 26/1/2022 20:59

Not sure about a swan but you are a true coq

[mike290] 26/1/2022 20:46

Hi Scot...,

As the closing "bid" price was 81.1 pence this evening, thankyou for taking the time to explain why the idea of a 78p cap was complete nonsense and urging us to completely ignore johnswan's posts on the subject.

Fortunately, I had no doubt that johnswan... and a couple of others were talking complete rubbish anyway.

To me, johnswan..., is an empty barrel who is ego-bound to give opinions (on any subject whether he knows anything about it or not) because of a compulsion to be heard.

I haven't read his posts for quite a while but I can sometimes gather what his often deliberately misleading, self-serving, worthless (no basis) opinions are from other posters.

Regards and Good Luck.

[sirmark] 26/1/2022 20:46

Chessman I know all about tlw I was long £1.65 quite heavy trying to catch the bounce started to make money on the Friday and Monday that RNS hit and wham down to 40's can't say I wasn't sweating lol but as with everything love to fight another day. I would like to point out the invest till the end isn't a strategy I take normally, it's a Panr unique situation as the want to sell and move on and waiting a year or two to make substantial money works as apposed to jist investing ... In life tomorrows never guaranteed but I'm sure I can live out until pan sells rather than waiting for long term stocks to finally mature till the point of making life changing sums Gl all

[chessman2] 26/1/2022 20:35

sirmark - 21568. Your strategy sounds good but it may not always work as I had the same plan with Tullow oil.

The ceo left but I decided to stay with the board till the end. I still hold them!!

[probabilityofsuccess] 26/1/2022 20:20

Hi johnswan - for the benefit of those individuals who want to believe that your posts are intended to help you challenge your own thinking/broaden your understanding of the downside risks, perhaps you could give 3 or 4 examples of where insight from another poster has identified a downside risk that you hadn’t already considered and the value that those posts added for your own investment thesis in PANR? Thanks.

[scot126] 26/1/2022 19:58

Dunce's cap johnswan193, post #21574.

"Upside case is easy to make for any share."

This is absolute codswallop. I'm shaking my head at the ignorance and patent inexperience of the solo stalker. No better evidence of Pinnacle Boy's complete lack of front office training or experience.

"Downside case is easy to make for any share. The answer is always 0p." (banal but closer to practical considerations)

Simple-minded gibberish. Embarrassing for a supposed professional. Go on HD, defend swan's inane comment above from post #21574. And while you're at it, using your long-lost analytical skills, why not tell him that the market is incorrectly pricing the upside risks *using all historically accepted and traditional sector metrics* and as laid out recently by Canaccord?

[padamster] 26/1/2022 19:48

Swan you seem to project and take out of context my messages. My point was that most if not all investors who hold a stock and want it to go up would not continuously post negative comments on their own holdings.

[padamster] 26/1/2022 19:48

Swan you seem to project and take out of context my messages. My point was that most if not all investors who hold a stock and want it to go up would not continuously post negative comments on their own holdings.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 19:35

Padamster, so in that case are you of the view that the purpose of these BBs is to cheerlead held stocks and continuously ramp and promote? Because that’s not what I come on these BBs for, and the comments of anybody I suspect of such behaviour will always be taken with a pinch of salt.

Upside case is easy to make for any share. And there is no shortage of people doing this. But for me personally a thorough and continuous assessment of the risks and downside case is imperative to decision making.

Some people don’t like that, that’s ok, just disregard and get back to focusing on the upside case only. No need for conspiracy theories on motives. I couldn’t care less what somebody’s motive might be - I’m comfortable that I’m perfectly capable of reading comments and taking out of them as much or as little or what might be useful or interesting to me.

[donkikong] 26/1/2022 18:45

I would also like to know "how long before we get the first result?".

Is it not during the drilling operations? I took that from them saying they'd publish "any important data as it comes" during the webinar?

[padamster] 26/1/2022 18:39

The swan, NGMS and intothewild (can’t remember the full names) - from my perspective you post according to your motives. I personally don’t believe any of you are holding stock hoping it would go up. The idea of posting comments (that if were true) ie the fictitious constant posting of the 78p ceiling are completely not something anyone would do if they want the share to go up. You only need to read the rns of funding and has nothing to do with 78p ceiling but sadly some people believe these false comments