We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 33.20 | 33.15 | 33.45 | 33.70 | 32.15 | 32.80 | 3,704,188 | 16:35:09 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0016 | -207.19 | 300.74M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/3/2023 07:52 | Now its the SMD that's the real prize. As usual always the next thing, not the current thing. In my opinion we still need to see production figures for March and April to observe behaviour over time. A steep decline more or less ends the current target, a shallow curve would perhaps preserve viability at $130 oil prices. gregpeck - PANR will go on for years. Investors show no sign of pulling back on the amount of equity they are prepared to fund. Not to the extent of the $100-200mn required to properly evaluate the area where Alkaid 2 is, but they'll always find funds for the next single well. I hope this sees an end to the tick tock nonsense. Truly the most childish and pathetic thing I have ever encountered from what is supposed to be a serious and thoughtful discipline. | hpcg | |
06/3/2023 07:44 | What price today. 30p? Lower? | johnswan193 | |
06/3/2023 07:42 | Be nice to see 30p today | truant2tb1 | |
06/3/2023 07:41 | It's a tale of 2 stories....the well performance is very strong......but on pure raw oil flow numbers (that retail investors want to see) maybe not the spectacular hit we had hoped. The oil flow rate at Alkaid #2 remained pretty much the same as before the cleanout, and was smaller than the company expectation for valid reasons, but the reservoir deliverability was "good" and this was the key deliverable of the production test which has potentially upgraded the entire PANR portfolio. The single biggest risk with Alkaid and in fact all of Pantheon's portfolio is reservoir deliverability...Is the reservoir energised and can it reservoir deliver liquids in good volumes without artificial means!! Alkaid #2 has done that in spades with flow rates of I think up to ~1,400bbls of liquids per day.....but the well has not improved its Barrel of Oil per day rates from before the clean out, due to the gas gap it intersected during drilling causing too much gas to come into this well. Most people acknowledge the large amounts of discovered oil with Pantheon (Schlumberger SLB resource 17.8 billion barrels), but there are lots of concerns (reasonable concerns) about can they produce at commercial production rates this good deliverability result at Alkaid #2 is a major de-risking event which applies to the entire Pantheon portfolio, and will be important in any major oil company farm-in. Large Oil companies will not overly concern themselves about exact oil flows on any individual well...they will look at liquids deliverability for the reservoir. The IP30 production rate is calculated at c.505 barrels per day ("BPD") of liquid hydrocarbons consisting of c.180 BOPD oil, c.325 BPD of condensate and natural gas liquids ("NGLs"), along with c.2,300 mcfpd natural gas. This delivers close to 1,000 boepd ie (hydrocarbons) not including frack fluids and/or formation water. Alkaid is flowing naturally without artificial lift demonstrating the good deliverability of the oil reservoir....this is a very positive! It is not the actual oil and NGL flow rate that matters in this test it's the total fluid rate which includes the frack fluid and any formation water hence the actual reservoir flow rate would be higher (~1,400bbls per day) than those reported. This is excellent and probably in line with expectations. Conden | marto1000 | |
06/3/2023 07:38 | We IP'd at over 500 barrel of oil and condensate and almost 500 barrels of gas to oil equivalent, equalling 1,000 BOE/d which actually indicates excellent reservoir deliverability... That from an oil man, not a spiteful muppet wanting everything to fail. | michaelsadvfn | |
06/3/2023 07:36 | But but but it's small and it's the gas cap and in future future future future we will do it better. Texas.... Alaska.... Failure after failure.... Shame really. Better luck next time for anyone ramped unto this by scotty sven and the others. | pro_s2009 | |
06/3/2023 07:34 | A disgraceful update from a sham of a company | truant2tb1 | |
06/3/2023 07:30 | Your shorts have been profitable, but for the wrong reason. The reservoir deliverability has proven to be good, maybe very good, but the gas cap has had a material effect. If any of us were to look back on all your vapid posts, not one of you was beating the drum for the lateral to be positioned 50ft lower. | scot126 | |
06/3/2023 07:29 | On a result from a distinct reservoir making up <4% of the total asset base? No chance. That's lunacy. | scot126 | |
06/3/2023 07:28 | Game over completely | kirk 6 | |
06/3/2023 07:26 | Your shorts have been profitable, but for the wrong reason. The reservoir deliverability has proven to be good, maybe very good, but the gas cap has had a material effect. If any of us were to look back on all your vapid posts, not one of you was beating the drum for the lateral to be positioned 50ft lower. | scot126 | |
06/3/2023 07:18 | Failure after failure. Expect there will be some gas rich and oil wet undies around here this morning. Shorts have been proved right. | johnswan193 | |
06/3/2023 07:13 | Hopefully this is it now and PANR goes to the wall where it belongs. | gregpeck7 | |
06/3/2023 07:12 | Nice to have been right all along but sorry for the holders. | bad gateway | |
06/3/2023 07:07 | Hahahahahahahahahaha | thebull8 | |
06/3/2023 07:04 | Love them Texan excuses. The well ain't commercial after all the partying around. Shock. | gregpeck7 | |
05/3/2023 22:20 | Sharing some thoughts on the flowback post well clean out. The estimated target to achieve good representative reservoir contact has moved up from the original 40% to 60%. This target has moved as more well data has been collected during the flow back/clean out phase to date. We also know that ~40% of the total injected has been recovered from the unblocked 75% of the horizontal section. Run that through the calculator and it shows the front 75% is at ~53% frack fluid recovery after some 30 days of sustained production post the coil tubing clean out. (Leaving the complication of the initial 10% frack fluid recovery, pre clean out aside, as its origins are unknown, but fair to say more from the heel than the toe) Recovery of frack fluid also follows a decline curve, so recovery will taper off over the last 7% in the front 75% of fractures. As this tapers off the oil flow will be tapering up, I would expect this to be substantially complete in 14 to 28 days, after which the oil rate will begin to trend down as is normal. Where it gets complicated is the back 25% of newly unblocked horizontal, starts from almost zero and will required a similar time frame (44 to 58 days) to reach the 60% frack fluid recovery. In this same timeframe its oil flow will also be trending up as the frack fluid is recovered. In time, and given the different production curve timings of the front and back sections of horizontal well. These two production curves will meet as the front curves down and the back curves up. That is the first key marker on decline curve analysis, and as fortune would have it is likely by the AGM and subsequent webinar on the 20th of March | olderwiser2 | |
05/3/2023 15:17 | I think you'll find,very soon,that it's the gang and their masters that are in denial.tick tock. | mlf51 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions