Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[truant2tb1] 21/12/2022 23:01

PANR is no stranger to poor flow test results:19 Apr 21. RNS 8111V"Today's news is a tale of two stories. We are of course disappointed not to deliver the high tested flow rates we were hoping for from the Kuparuk. We will continue our analysis of this complex zone as we believe it still offers great potential for our Company."FYI - Talitha #ARoll on the next update RNS

[mlf51] 21/12/2022 08:19

Think I'd prefer to wait for the 750 bopd ( minimum) whenever it comes.

[westx] 21/12/2022 08:17

45 BOPD. Believe they got there at the end of the party

[bad gateway] 21/12/2022 07:08

Looks like BLOE has beaten PANR to the plate with their flow results. Wondered who's be first. Hope PANR do well too when theirs are finally in.

[adxwasere] 21/12/2022 00:09

Does everyone recall Pro previous to the other shorts. Flip flops all over the place. Set up his own little channel when we all left . Good luck pro I actually mean it. But I for one am not listening to you , never did to be fair, hopefully you haven't put any new investors off, or cost anyone money. thank goodness Swendab checked you and kept you in line. Well done Swen. Adz

[probabilityofsuccess] 20/12/2022 08:59

Will do, thanks JakNife 👍😀

[shanig] 20/12/2022 07:52

If you are that confident, why do you put in the huge amount of time and effort here? Surely you can just sit back and enjoy the slide.Just doesn't add up.

[chris0805] 20/12/2022 07:44

JakNike is clearly a deluded individual who thinks that he / she / they are far more important than he / she / they actually is. JakNife attempts to scare investors on a BB, by hiding behind an anonymous user name and contributing nothing to the discussion... other than twaddle... hope nobody has been influenced by his / her / their rubbish.

[probabilityofsuccess] 20/12/2022 00:39

Thanks for the response JakNife. Did you have the same 100% confidence when you stated that the Schlumberger report didn’t model flow rates?………….and if so, once you acknowledged you were wrong with that statement, did you reflect on potentially being wrong about anything else………….like the fact that your suggested initial flow rates and decline that you used as the case for not being commercial was actually broadly accepted as surpassing the commerciality threshold?

I’m trying to get an understanding of your ability to recognise that you have been wrong in the past, so you may be wrong again? That can’t give you 100% confidence can it (unless you don’t reflect and try to learn from your previous mistakes of course)?

Anyway, as we’ve discussed before, you’re ‘invested̵7; until the end game on this (whatever that may be) so it’ll be either very positive for you, or the potential for a huge (whatever the opposite of a multi bagger is) percentage loss. Not a risk/reward I’d be comfortable with but each to their own.

[fifthelementinvesting] 19/12/2022 23:25

KEEP TRYING SHORTERS. ITS ENJOYABLE TO READ THE DESPERATION BRIGADES POSTS. CHOOOOF CHOOOF... ALL ABOARD JAK n' RETTOS DESPERATION TRAIN. DESTINATION FAILURE-VILLE. CHOOOF CHOOOOOF! TRYING THEIR VERY BEST TO REWRITE FACTS...

THEY ARENT REALISING THAT MOST OF THE LARGE SHORTS ARE JUST HEDGING AND COVERED ELSEWHERE, LEAVING RETAIL SHORTS TO TAKE THE HIT AND WITH THEIR PANTS DOWN! CUE JAK AND AMARETTO... LOL. THEY HAVENT GOT A CLUE!!

18Bn barrels OIP and a huge flare at A2.

Shorters gonna get fried to a crisp with.

Look forward to it.

[probabilityofsuccess] 19/12/2022 21:47

JakNife - what do you believe the probability of failure is of this well please - i.e. the chances of the flow tests proving a non-commercial reservoir? Cheers.