Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[truant2tb1] 22/11/2022 21:45

Ask yourself why Pantheon are happy to publish rampy 9 page booklets from Baker Hughes which avoid any mention of commerciality or even "flow" but avoid sharing the LKA report (CPR) which says the resources are merely contingent ie not economic.Not difficult to work this one out really!AWKWARD

[probabilityofsuccess] 22/11/2022 21:44

What do we need to be careful about bad gateway - WE KNOW there is risk. We are not uninformed. The share price could go down. I haven’t heard any of the shorters even recognising that a positive flow test result could undermine their whole thesis which could mean that the share price will never go below 70p again. It’s possible isn’t it? But no, none of them will even acknowledge it as a possibility. Are YOU sure YOU don’t need to be reminding the shorts that THEY need to be careful?

[olderwiser2] 22/11/2022 21:35

OH Jaknife, hypocritical, mountains out of molehills has been your entire campaign.

You have even stooped to deliberate misquoting to flesh out a nothing over the IER

[bad gateway] 22/11/2022 21:34

Bulls need to be careful too imo.
This is classic denial and shows no answer will ever be good enough for the bulls...

Rabito79
22 Nov '22 - 19:23 - 30387 of 30399
0 0 0
Cool, name just one.



JakNife
22 Nov '22 - 20:28 - 30389 of 30399
0 0 0
Rabito79,

Sand.

Rabito79
22 Nov '22 - 20:33 - 30390 of 30399
0 0 0
Just one, JakNife? Endless possibilities?

[padamster] 22/11/2022 21:29

Jaknife and the other cronies and frauds (Truant, Amaretto, Loglorry, Pro, Unhelpful - to name a few) have zero credibility thanks to their own posting. Self destruction comes to mind

Be very careful

[olderwiser2] 22/11/2022 21:24

Man up you have been caught in a malicious fabricated misdirect
Your credibility is shot.

[olderwiser2] 22/11/2022 21:10

Rubbish JakKnife, you have chosen to misinform, it is clearly your agenda.

Also of note you now think, rather than know, so just your opinion

More interested in the motive question which you have ignored.

Simplified, are you a buyer or a shorter

[probabilityofsuccess] 22/11/2022 21:07

“It sounds as if you're describing a cult!?!?!”

typo?













All those !?!?!?

[olderwiser2] 22/11/2022 20:43

Dear me, JakNife, you are bending the truth here and misquoting, adding an A and Quote marks shifts the meaning just enough to make the FUD case

A question for the bulls. Lee Keeling & Associates have prepared an "Independent Expert Report" and a "Resource Statement",

Here is the actual wording I saw, in which it can be read as a single report with resource statement included. There is no a before "Resource Statement"

"Pantheon confirms receipt of an Independent Expert Report and Resource Statement from the International Petroleum Consultants Lee Keeling & Associates, Inc"

All of which is now a little moot as the Alkaid 2 vertical drill has shown new data, which improves on the original Alkaid anomaly flow tested at Alkaid 1.

Time to catch up with the present, that is what matters, not a currently out of date IER

Could you also answer a question, are you actively supporting the short campaign, or alternatively supporting the purchase of cheap shares as a long position

[rabito79] 22/11/2022 20:33

Just one, JakNife? Endless possibilities?

[probabilityofsuccess] 22/11/2022 19:28

Lol JakNife! Thought you were trying to help others understand by providing your insight, but won’t answer questions you don’t like 🤣

Feels like you are just another of those ‘believersR17; who, ironically, doesn’t consider the other side of the argument and can’t see themselves being wrong………you’re no different to the other shorts! Blind faith!

You portray the exact behaviours you berate the longs for, even though WE all accept there is downside risk! You couldn’t make it up! All the best 👍

[rabito79] 22/11/2022 19:23

Cool, name just one.

[rabito79] 22/11/2022 19:19

Jaknife, no


No can you point to what could be in the report which would negate them agreeing Alkaid is a discovery and that the measured poro/perm data and development plan won’t deliver the NPVs modelled?

[padamster] 22/11/2022 19:04

Jaknife - put the spade down. I gave the same advice to unhelpful. Then again carry on as you muddy waters cronies get exposed the more you spout.

Be very careful 😂

[probabilityofsuccess] 22/11/2022 19:02

Hi JakNife - Perhaps all the other O&G explorers are are more keen to ‘market’ themselves. Given a lot of the shorters argue that most AIM O&G explorers fail commercially, yet they publish CPR’s, perhaps there’s an inverse correlation between producing a CPR and a successful company……;..so good news! 😉

Any chance you could answer my question from some time back please - what positive news would it take for you to consider closing your short because you consider it to rebut your thesis on PANR (and then possibly go long?)? Thanks

[rabito79] 22/11/2022 18:54

Bingo! Ask for the reason they didn't publish it, get an answer and say they are lying. I assume flim flam is French for lying.Bof!