ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

PANR Pantheon Resources Plc

32.65
-0.10 (-0.31%)
Last Updated: 13:44:53
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pantheon Resources Plc LSE:PANR London Ordinary Share GB00B125SX82 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.10 -0.31% 32.65 32.55 32.80 32.75 32.20 32.75 491,988 13:44:53
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Natural Gas Liquids 804k -1.45M -0.0016 -204.06 296.2M
Pantheon Resources Plc is listed in the Natural Gas Liquids sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PANR. The last closing price for Pantheon Resources was 32.75p. Over the last year, Pantheon Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 10.10p to 45.50p.

Pantheon Resources currently has 907,206,399 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Pantheon Resources is £296.20 million. Pantheon Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -204.06.

Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 22776 to 22800 of 60125 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  917  916  915  914  913  912  911  910  909  908  907  906  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
10/2/2022
16:33
Madd_RIP, well I won't be, for the reasons I've stated. Anyone who thinks someone posting on this board only posts facts must be called Scott.
ngms27
10/2/2022
16:30
As an aside I very much look forward to production from wells , the attraction of institutions and the faze out of small minded retail gamblers
winner66
10/2/2022
16:27
So obvious that big money was going to arrive late on today’s session. And indeed it has .
winner66
10/2/2022
16:21
Swan seems to be flailing around looking for problems even where they don’t exist
Much more cr*p and he’s filtered

sandcrab2
10/2/2022
16:17
Mike drop..........
madd_rip
10/2/2022
15:32
I think you should tbh. Because the manner in which you post you have the belief it is empirical fact, when in fact your opinion is patently not.
madd_rip
10/2/2022
15:27
Re: johnswan19310 Feb '22 - 12:26
"More recently - we're told by both Jay and Bob that the testing of the BFF at Talitha was never about flow rates and always about proving moveable oil at this location. Yet a year ago after drilling Talitha we were told the aim of testing was to prove producible oil for the BFF at this distal location."

That was because we didn't own Theta West a year ago. We needed to prove flow rate in the BFF at Talitha a year ago, because that was the only way to get that oil out. Now we own Theta West, flow rates at Talitha are not required as we can get it from there instead.

neil9327b
10/2/2022
15:24
All posts on bulletin boards unless they quote a source are the posters opinion end of, so no need to do as you say on every post.
ngms27
10/2/2022
15:06
You really should add IMO to all of your posts. Better to under promise and over deliver, is that not a better system for the BOD?
Not in your jaded life it seems. You even refute experts with decades of EXPERIENCE (which as a self proclaimed academic you have none of)

madd_rip
10/2/2022
14:53
michaelsadvfn

alot of money is waiting on the sidelines, if there is large oil column as predicted then its party time.

They have to make sure.

nav1000
10/2/2022
14:52
ngms27 10 Feb '22 - 14:28 - 22436 of 22437 0 2 0

Sure I agree 11% is low and will likely be nearer 20%

...or even 40%+ as with other operators.
Best leave this type of discussion to the experts on site.

michaelsadvfn
10/2/2022
14:51
The reason I answered is because it's a statement of fact. Most (if not all) of the existing North Slope reservoirs will have greater recovery factors as they do have better reservoir properties.
ngms27
10/2/2022
14:47
So why initially reply with a more negative comment? It must be in your nature to constantly deride.
madd_rip
10/2/2022
14:33
Cool 4Billion it is then.
rabito79
10/2/2022
14:28
Sure I agree 11% is low and will likely be nearer 20%
ngms27
10/2/2022
14:27
Hey johnswan - what’s your view on his comments?
probabilityofsuccess
10/2/2022
14:25
I think only basing it on primary recovery for some of the reservoirs is also a contributing factor is it not ngms?
rabito79
10/2/2022
14:21
Hey Scot, have you reached out to Josh Young yet to address his comments?
johnswan193
10/2/2022
14:12
Bobbiedazzler, that's because PANR have low permeability reservoirs than most on the slope.
ngms27
10/2/2022
14:11
So you do not trust this BB sirmark?:-))GLAC
chris0805
10/2/2022
13:32
In BoD we trust
probabilityofsuccess
10/2/2022
13:21
HD for clarification it's the BOD I trust... :) (honestly I am yet to find a better BOD)
sirmark
10/2/2022
13:20
You don't substantiate your point. The BOD remarks seem to me to be consistent with the facts. Evidence is that they are very conservative since Texas: look at estimated recovery rates compared with rest of the slope
bobbiedazzler
10/2/2022
13:08
Sorry Petajen,
You (rather the original poster) mentioned WINX and the old oil shows RNS's.

They were not the same as 16th Feb Talitha update. Post logging etc.

Winx was during drilling we saw sommat type RNSs.

Sorry merely mention of WINX makes me nauseous!

officerdigby
10/2/2022
12:51
Understood hiddendepths - now that’s a whole different Wow! Cheers for clarifying.
probabilityofsuccess
Chat Pages: Latest  917  916  915  914  913  912  911  910  909  908  907  906  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock