ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

PILR Pacific Ind

119.00
0.00 (0.00%)
19 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Pacific Ind LSE:PILR London Ordinary Share GB00BYV8MN78 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 119.00 117.00 121.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Pacific Ind Share Discussion Threads

Showing 26 to 50 of 100 messages
Chat Pages: 4  3  2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/7/2017
16:34
No news that I can see at the moment but should get an update before the week is out.

"It is expected that details of the Placing including, inter alia, final size, pricing and the expected timetable of principal events will be announced on or before 28 July 2017."

I echo Ninbo's sentiment towards this REIT - namely the returns justify holding it long term. I missed BBOX and am still kicking myself, to me this is a higher risk version of BBOX ... with this prospective transaction mitigating a large portion of this through diversification. I appreciate we're reluctant to see our shares diluted, but I've bought shares at a 2% premium to YE '16 NAV, BBOX trades at close to a 16% premium and has rallied 5p while this placing has been open. My main worry is the transaction doesn't go through but I think that scenario unlikely.

To me the management strategy is clear...clone BBOX - 1. Prove slightly tweaked concept - done 2. make the REIT relevant size - in progress through capital raise 3. Aggressively market as BBOX's little brother - let's say management are two thirds as successful as BBOX so this implies a 10% premium to NAV and we arrive at 128p...

If I'm right I'll tip my hat to the management team. It's a damn good idea, and they will make themselves very wealthy ... note they are big holders of the fund and in addition the performance fee structure is heavily front loaded out to 2020 (to capture I believe the tailwind of the NAV premium build).

pyufak
26/7/2017
19:20
I won't be selling whatever - I bought for 15% a year capital growth from decent buying and active management and 6% ish income once regears come through. Of course I hope it's not too dilutive.
nimbo1
26/7/2017
17:17
Looks like this has been a big success. Suspect its not too dilutive then. Anything much below NAV and its time for us to sell, given we were not given the opportunity.
topvest
26/7/2017
15:39
Blimey that was quick - hopefully good news then. They didn't contact me despite me being in on the last one.
spectoacc
26/7/2017
15:27
Results of the bookbuild will be out tomorrow.
tiltonboy
26/7/2017
13:29
Pyufak I agree with your comments. I am a holder in bbox and have also bought in here. BBOX is a guaranteed 4.5% a year income. This has a much stronger return profile potential over the next couple of years.
nimbo1
23/7/2017
18:12
No real excuse not to give existing holders a chance to participate. Will keep holding for now, but they need to change their ways to gain respect amongst their existing holders.
topvest
23/7/2017
09:48
Building a new long in this. Strong management team, like the fundamentals, 110m is trans-formative for the company and adds significant diversification benefits. My own view is the placing will go well this time given the one year performance.

I spoke with Canaccord to attempt to get into the placement as I'm looking to pick up a reasonable clip but unfortunately seems difficult for those who manage their own portfolios (was directed to wealth managers who could facilitate...but i don't like the on-going high fees) - if anyone knows differently please let me know.

Overall, buying in the 116-119 range is a slight premium to the NAV & you risk some dilution but given paragraph 1. I think the execution premium is worth paying for what is going in the 'long term hold portfolio'.

pyufak
17/7/2017
08:22
Agreed - noted with interest the NAV of 116p. I benefited from the last placing (in at a discount) but would be less impressed now a shareholder :)

What interests me more is whether they're more confident of raising the money this time. They were way off the amount they were hoping for last time.

And with market cap c.£25m vs c.£110m they're hoping for, the price they raise at will certainly be interesting.

Overall, still giving them the benefit of the doubt - they've done what they said they would so far.

spectoacc
14/7/2017
21:51
Still no open offer. They are not exactly being very nice to existing holders. If this is dilutive I will not be impressed.
topvest
14/7/2017
07:19
Wonder if they'll have more success than last time getting the placing away? Could transform the co if they manage it.

"The company said it expects to announce further details of the placing around July 28, and that each member of the board and management team have confirmed their intention to participate. "

spectoacc
23/5/2017
07:25
All positive, but I'd have liked NAV to have been higher. We know they're very shrewd buyers from the roadshow, but not convinced that's really coming through yet.


"22.6% total shareholder return over the period compared to 0.0% annual total shareholder return for FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Index to 31 March 2017
Earnings and dividend
-- EPRA earnings per share of 7.8 pence, reflecting the rapid deployment of capital into highly income generative assets
-- Declaration of dividend of 3.0 pence per share, taking total dividends paid or declared in respect of the period ended 31 March 2017 to 6.0 pence per share, reflecting an annualised yield of 6.2% on the IPO price
-- Dividend covered 1.3x by EPRA earnings per share "

spectoacc
22/5/2017
12:46
Was thinking they might be "once bitten" on the fundraising - and I can think of several smaller REITs and ITs they'd fit nicely with instead. Whether all the personalities would fit is another matter!
spectoacc
22/5/2017
12:40
Agreed. I don't think Cannacord would have taken them on without them being able to do something. I suspect there is a deal around the corner.
tiltonboy
22/5/2017
11:05
Same here! Was very surprised when they failed to raise anything like what they thought, but now a bit of no-man's-land with the liquidity/co size.
spectoacc
22/5/2017
10:21
Specto,

I was the beneficiary of the last placing, but obviously do not wish it to happen again!

tiltonboy
22/5/2017
08:57
Yes, although that activity could yet be another dilutory placing - they only raised a fraction of what they wanted last time, despite thinking they had quite a bit of it in the bag.
spectoacc
22/5/2017
08:54
Good news about Cannacord coming on board as well. This should be the prelude to more activity.
tiltonboy
22/5/2017
08:45
Results tomorrow, be interesting to see where NAV is at. Can't see the tone of the results being anything but positive.
spectoacc
02/12/2016
20:25
He is a very successful investor though, which is why I bought some in the first place.
topvest
01/12/2016
22:19
I stand corrected.
tiltonboy
01/12/2016
21:23
Not really - he's behind Pacific.
topvest
01/12/2016
13:19
Sir John Beckwith taking a 27% stake is a bit of a coup!
tiltonboy
30/11/2016
19:49
Yes, agreed - it was not good form to dilute holders in this way. I will let them off this time, given their small size, but will sell if they play that sort of stunt again.
topvest
30/11/2016
16:25
I've added PILR to the CP+ Header
skyship
Chat Pages: 4  3  2  1

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock