Netplay TV Share Discussion Threads

[casabella2] 01/3/2017 17:20

oops double post.

[casabella2] 01/3/2017 17:20

Needless to say I will be voting against this ridiculous take over offer.Having said that if it is voted in favour of,will our 9p/share be paid into our bank accounts automatically.c2

[casabella2] 01/3/2017 17:20

Needless to say I will be voting against this ridiculous take over offer.Having said that if it is voted in favour of,will our 9p/share be paid into our bank accounts automatically.c2

[speedsgh] 27/2/2017 13:35

IC = Investors Chronicle. Subscription only. The excerpt is from a Simon Thompson article published on 14/2...

[raybawilliams] 27/2/2017 13:31

What is IC? Any chance you can post a link?

[casabella2] 26/2/2017 09:08

Lets hope that this is the case.

[coxsmn] 25/2/2017 18:18

Pg 15 of this weeks IC, 'Netplay TV: Reject bid'.dyor.

[trentendboy] 14/2/2017 16:50

Disgraceful really. Should have seen that one coming.

[casabella2] 14/2/2017 08:10

Lets hope so.

[trentendboy] 14/2/2017 07:47

Move above 9. White knight must be turning up

[maloneyt] 13/2/2017 21:54

you can say that again c2. I can't believe it either ??

[casabella2] 13/2/2017 16:41

It's daylight robbery at this price.Can't believe the institutions and directors can let it go for what has been offered.c2

[aishah] 13/2/2017 14:44

A bit of buying today and offer upto 8.95p.

IC VIEW:

We're not convinced the offer represents Netplay's fair value but the group's entire board, including non-executive directors who are not included in the incentivisation scheme, unanimously recommended the offer. In September, the group said its growth plan, launched at the start of 2016, could be bolstered with "either bolt-on or transformational M&A opportunities", which made it sound like the active party. Management has clearly given up on that idea in favour of being bought. Await documents.

[trentendboy] 05/2/2017 22:34

Need a white knight and fast

[casabella2] 05/2/2017 18:28

This cannot be allowed to go through.How can 9p be a realistic price even for the institutions to sell their shares at.This takeover must be voted against.c2

[coxsmn] 05/2/2017 16:32

The 9p proposed offer is a nonsense and brings into question the competency of the management, we have here a cash rich profitable business yet they seem to lack the ability to identify opportunities to grow the business and instead are opting for an all out sale on the cheap, "Here at bookies.com, we think that Betsson's valuation of Netplay falls short of their actual worth" https://bookies.com/news/netplay-shares-increase-after-betsson-takeover-emerges.htmldyor,coxsmn

[casabella2] 03/2/2017 16:26

Lets hope it never is then.

[euroto] 03/2/2017 15:53

75% is not reached yet.

[philjeans] 03/2/2017 15:38

The "clever" institutions could easily force a higher price - but they just don't care!

They're using other peoples money; on huge salaries and bonuses; and just can't be bothered.

[ali47fish] 03/2/2017 15:34

i cant believe how with clever sharholders like slater and hargreave hale this is allowed to happeh-by the way can someone please explain the rns 8.3 about hale?

[chimers] 03/2/2017 14:49

You invest in the markets just as one would take a cold shower.
Quick in and quick out.
'Nathaniel Rothschild'