Neometals Share Discussion Threads

[wild bill] 24/1/2006 09:07

mmmmmmmmmm do you know something we don't adam

[adam] 24/1/2006 09:07

The 50k was mine - It was a buy.

[wild bill] 24/1/2006 08:54

also heard nothing

[pc4900074200] 23/1/2006 22:08

25October you are correct. The 100k trade went through at 11:25:57 am
19th Jan. 2006. Code number: 404LCAQ306 @ 0.50p, marked as a sell.

There was another trade on the same day in the afternoon for 50k. Marked
as a T trade. Code number: 404LFQC406 @ 0.505p, marked as a sell.

The next nearest large trade was the previous day [18/01/2005] for 50k
@ 0.51p and that was a T trade.

You then have to go back to the 13th for a 25k T trade.

The date looks to have been reported incorrectly. Looks to me, we will
see another RNS in the morning to correct this?

I will not be sending another email to the T/O panel. LOL.

It was nice to see that it was a buy, or have they got that wrong as well?

Regards. pc

:-]

Added 23:43pm.

I have received no answer to the email [sent in December] or letter / email copy sent over a week ago.

[25october1969] 23/1/2006 21:08

Pc - the trade is reported in the RNS as being on 20 Jan, I have no record of any large trade on 20 Jan but do note a 100k trade on 19th Jan - I hope they have not got the date wrong or is there another trade still to be reported - I doubt it!

[pc4900074200] 23/1/2006 19:34

Several days late. May-be the email to T/O Panel helped?

pc

Edit: In the RNS, its down as a buy????

On the day of trade, it was a sell????

[adam] 23/1/2006 18:15

There's your answer - it's Gyllenhammar, which can't be much of a surprise to anybody.

[wild bill] 21/1/2006 18:20

get it sent big number

[pc4900074200] 20/1/2006 13:34

I feel an email to the take-over panel is looming.

I will give them until close.

pc

[jurgen klinnsman] 20/1/2006 13:31

thats correct but when there broken certain people get jumped on and others get no action taken against themselves...i used to work for a well known electrical retailer.....you can guess which one they used to specialise in cameras and they had 4 or 5 tory mps on the payroll not directors or anything like that we never saw them or even heard they were connected but a trusted friend saw a revealing document that put them on the pay book......nothing other than a ( if we do something wrong it will be pushed under the carpet job ) i hope thats clear. its a corrupt world

[pc4900074200] 20/1/2006 13:24

jurgen

Rules are Rules!!

pc

:-]

[jurgen klinnsman] 20/1/2006 13:21

pc.....volvere will do whatever they want and get away with it...lets not forget kalms is tory party treasurer and has plenty of poweful mates that make any wrong doing ok....i hold but as soon as volvere took over i wrote the money off...its gone forget about it...we have all been shafted.

[pc4900074200] 20/1/2006 13:18

Under the provisions of Rule 8.1 of the Code, all "dealings" in " relevant sercurities" of [ the offeror or of] the offeree company by the offeror or the offeree company, or by any of their respective "associates", must be disclosed by no later than 12.00 noon [London time] on the London business day following the date of the relevant transaction.

100,000 sold yesterday????

That's 1.148% of company shares.

Where is the RNS???

pc

[pachandl] 19/1/2006 20:41

WB - are you talking about blue run or Blue Nun? If the latter, I advise you to trade up to a better class of beverage.

[wild bill] 19/1/2006 17:10

that blue run looks like a black run to me

[waldron] 19/1/2006 10:38

on second thoughts don't

[waldron] 19/1/2006 10:38

you can say that again.

[wild bill] 19/1/2006 10:29

quiet in here

[waldron] 16/1/2006 11:07

Where are my favourite posters these days?.

Strange but i miss you both.

trying to snow here.

[srsm] 14/1/2006 17:36

Keep in mind that the Annual Report will be published in April or thereabouts. We should see what they are spending on themselves then. Also, the two main technical people are still employed ie G Crowther and their main syringe guru (a chap called Martin (don't know Surname) - I spoke to him on the phone just before Xmas). So, the syringe business is still in being presumably.

[pc-49] 14/1/2006 10:32

Pc
I wish I could make a sensible suggestion as to what NMT's retail shareholders could do to rid the company of its present malaise and management.
The way they replied to WB's attempts to contact them, and to yours, is unforgivable. I've attempted to do some research on this fellow Gold. I've spoken to a couple of friends who know of him and one informs me he has a tendency to try and emulate his namesake spelt without the 'l'. That as it maybe, the fact that NMT is an AIM listed company made it susceptible to the kind of agro' entrepreneurial takeover that gave the Lander brothers a free reign. The one thing I could never understand is why the institutional shareholders at the time let it happen.
The previous management is not completely blameless either. I always had the impression they believed they were negotiating for contracts from a position of strength with potential customers, in effect they negotiated themselves out of contracts by trying to be too greedy. Six years ago my family concern secured a contract that was worthless so far as profit was concerned, since, the contract has been renegotiated three times and is now the core profit side of the business.
Not being a shareholder any longer I could be accused of speaking out of turn, the only suggestion I can make is put NMT behind you and move on. Karma will eventually show itself, in circumstances such as this where ignorance and disregard for all except ones own benefit, comeuppance day is always only just around the corner. (Try CRX for a mover in the near future, but DYOR).
PC-49

[pc4900074200] 13/1/2006 20:07

PC-49

I thought that but needed to clarify that my use of what had been posted
was an example that the Directors can speak to shareholders if they choose.

As they have not chose to speak to all shareholders my view is that their
intentions are not honourable and our original suspicions look to have some ground.

The question is where do we go from here?

pc

[pc-49] 13/1/2006 19:41

pc re:- post 7115
The inference was not that 25th was involved in any underhandedness, it was purely a statement to confirm your reasoning that management were duty bound to relay what they had to say to ALL retail shareholders as I take 25th to be.
Personally I can think of no reason for management to contact individual shareholders unless they have an alterior motive for so doing.
The new management has admitted that the chairman can't even build a computer (which is childs play) yet takes on a company involved in high tech' medical equipment. Just who are they kidding? The cash pile is the honey-pot, and has been all along!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PC-49 sn

[waldorfo] 13/1/2006 17:25

Nothing changed then......... A belated...... Happy new Year
ZZZZZZ zzzzzzzz

[wild bill] 13/1/2006 17:21

Where the snow is, and when I make a profit on NMT.

Do they ski in Hell, cos it'll freeze over before I make any money here.........