We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Grid Plc | LSE:NG. | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BDR05C01 | ORD 12 204/473P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.50 | 0.42% | 1,066.00 | 1,066.00 | 1,066.50 | 1,071.00 | 1,059.00 | 1,064.00 | 10,158,619 | 16:35:18 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Combination Utilities, Nec | 24.25B | 7.8B | 2.1140 | 5.04 | 39.33B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
13/2/2018 17:11 | Surely not going under 700 ? This is starting to look silly now. It's got to be political. I bet JC and JM are giggling, I wonder if they've brought a few themselves and tucked them under there red beds. | veryniceperson | |
13/2/2018 16:51 | MJ19, are you short on these? As Newbank asks do you work for an Institution with a vested interest? Wasn't Morgan Stanley recommending 'Overweight' on 22nd Jan with a price target of £11.00? | utyinv | |
13/2/2018 16:28 | MJ19, Eh? Sorry, your post is confusing. Do you work for a Broker, Hedge Fund, Financial institution? I only ask because you mention e-mails etc. Also, to quote 2003 and 2010 lows and trends (if I understand your post) we were in different territory ie, we were lightly involved in the US (early days) and since then our Assett base both in the US and U.K. ( including Interconnectors) have more than doubled. Also 2010 was the global crash where the likes of say Diageo were £6/£7. So sorry,I don’t understand the gist of the e-mails, ie, what e-mails and from whom and for what purpose and what does ‘one of ours’ mean ?? | newbank | |
13/2/2018 16:13 | Or in plain English, nothing actually happened.But with National Grid (NG.), something almost did occur to judge by emails received. This lot are "one of ours", a share we monitor on a daily basis for clients. For some time, we've been warning this is on a path to 690p with secondary, when broken, at a bouncy bottom hopefully around the 630p mark.The dashed line across the bottom of the screen dates from 2003 and certainly gives hope to some justification will be found for a bounce should 630p - or so - make an appearance eventually. Alas, we've a slight concern about the 630p ambition as it catapults the share price into a region where 490p makes a long term attraction, rather effectively matching the lows of 2010 and signalling a viable entry point. If it even appears! | mj19 | |
13/2/2018 15:24 | Morgan Stanley upgrade 10.50 did nothing today | mj19 | |
13/2/2018 14:50 | Sp/Andy, IMV the biggest issue is OFGEM and their unrealistic demands on cutting revenue. On Nationalisation, yes Royal Mail will be easier to bring back yet their share price remains quite high. MacDonnell states that the bonds they will exchange shares for (if that is legally possible for a viable and profitable company) the cost would be determined at the time. Here’s a thought though, everyone is assuming the price is being driven low due to the threat. However, if you go back to the election last year when there was a serious chance Labour would get in to power, Analysts were saying the price could be pushed up higher because the new Gov would have to buy at market rate. So if that was the case, if the Hedge Funds want to make money, there is an opinion that if the threat of Corbyn was credible, the Hedge Funds would push up the price of the shares to sqeeze more money out of the Gov (more bonds for a more expensive share)especially as the rate of those bonds pay interest secured by a Nation. So, maybe you are right, maybe it’s not Nationalisation but instead it’s the inaptitude of this Gov in giving a blanket statement of price caps without any qualification as who it applies to and to what measure. After all, this Government is fantastic at procrastinating. TM is IMO a poor PM who never gets anything done and dusted. She concentrated on Brexit so much so that everything else is delayed. Most Brits just want the Gov to tackle what affects them most, ie, the economy etc. Most Remainers and Leavers are becoming more united by the day for wanting TM to get a good deal with Barnier or walk away. Either way procrastinating does no one any good. Just ask yourself what has TM and her Cabinet delivered since coming to Office in Autumn of 2016? Apart from going on glorified holidays to different parts of the world, she and they (Cabinet) appear to have done Jack S..t! TM’s husband Philip went to China, why?? Was it to feather his own interests in business? Call me cynical but I believe there is more to it than meets the eye. | newbank | |
13/2/2018 14:50 | baz The 1970's A Yes, it did not kill their pension's they are on now did it. | srpactive | |
13/2/2018 14:37 | srpactive (5985) "lloy had £13bn in the bank before it was ruined by VB and GB, and they got away with it" Warren Buffett: "We look for three things when we hire people. We look for intelligence, we look for initiative or energy, and we look for integrity. And if they don’t have the latter, the first two will kill you" | arf dysg | |
13/2/2018 14:22 | The threat of Corbyn getting in being responsible for the constantly falling price seems reasonable until one looks at the lofty heights of the Royal Mail price that is facing the same threat. Are we all barking up the wrong tree? | andyj | |
13/2/2018 14:21 | srpactive, you have got me there,I assume the first bit is the link to the Labour Party but the throwing workers off building sites???? | baztea49 | |
13/2/2018 13:08 | baz Sorry, just one question are GB, JC and JM linked by anything? Abbot That will be the least of the troubles, just wait until they start throwing workers off building sites. | srpactive | |
13/2/2018 12:55 | srpactive, ffs dinny mention LLOYDS tae me, I lost 18k on that lot and stayed out of the market for a few years because of them.I hope history is not repeating itself. | baztea49 | |
13/2/2018 12:48 | Not looking very good if the Labour party get in and threats to renationalize start to be initiated soon after. Could be another election sooner rather than later amidst the Brexit problems. Not sure that the Grid will escape fall out and will continue to drop. Do I stay or do I go? questions ! | abbotslynn | |
13/2/2018 12:42 | Any future Government can easily nationalise these businesses - they’d issue bonds in order to do so. | saltaire111 | |
13/2/2018 12:31 | Baz Neither relatively, lloy had £13bn in the bank before it was ruined by VB and GB, and they got away with it, you would have been punished more for stealing an apple from a market stall. A safe stock just does not exist. | srpactive | |
13/2/2018 11:45 | Same Baz. I'm buying these on a very long term outlook. I consider these cheap, and will buy more should it continue to fall | the deacon | |
13/2/2018 11:32 | Ok, a relatively safe stock then. I moved from SSE to here thinking it was a safer place to be, ach c'est la vie | baztea49 | |
13/2/2018 11:23 | 720 next support | mj19 | |
13/2/2018 11:14 | Baz There is and never has been a safe stock. M24 It is the fear of it, not the fact that it may not be done, imho. | srpactive | |
13/2/2018 11:02 | still holding these, there is just not billions about to nationalise any part of this industry the first/only threat is to the railways/M6Toll road | mike24 | |
13/2/2018 10:51 | Where does this end?.This is not all down to the threat of nationalisation there has to be more to it than that.When this goes xd(a wee while away yet) it will chop a further 30p of the share price This is the first time I bought a safe share for the divvie.Yep very safe indeed.Avery long road back for me. | baztea49 | |
13/2/2018 10:49 | C Dow futures weak, I think this is now about politics not fundamentals etc etc, 680p is my next target, as said just looking at the moment, dyor as you do. | srpactive | |
13/2/2018 10:04 | Google it. | theobaldr |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions