Nasstar Share Discussion Threads

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 13:11

No and who is he may I ask

[p3psimax] 07/3/2011 13:09

No worries! But answer me this, are you Jason Bourne?

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 13:06

A nice posting MAX and thanks

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 11:06

well at least you can speak with some authority

[treblewide] 07/3/2011 10:59

just under 250,000 shares.....why?

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 10:50

By the way how much stock have you in NASSTAR

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 10:49

Oh dear, sorry I have upset you TREBLEWIDE

[treblewide] 07/3/2011 10:46

someone who talks nonsense on public BB's?

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 10:14

Treble has his opinion but the premise is that the company is not big enough on its own but who am I !!

[skidaddle] 07/3/2011 09:49

I can well believe that Charles Black was looking to sell a year ago. Things were moving very slowly in the cloud at that time and I know he has an interest in Space Exploration Network for the future. But reading between the lines NASA looks as if it is just about to take off (excuse the pun) so I doubt that he would want to sell until the price of NASA reflects the pent up energy in the pipeline as suggested in the last results. It's just so tiresome having to wait for this to happen though.

[treblewide] 07/3/2011 09:42

nonsense....anyone claiming on a free and publicly viewable bulleting baord that they have insider information is talking nonsese.

if they did the last thing someone would do is post that they do....seen hundreds of them over the years and to a man/woman they all tend to be lying and tend to cluster around small shares

[arty] 07/3/2011 09:39

In general yes, BUT some folk have a track record of getting it right and they're the ones to take note of.

[treblewide] 07/3/2011 09:35

see all this i have a source carry on but i cannot reveal it....take it as it is...total and utter nonsense

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 08:54

I agree with everything you say SKID all of a sudden the media and tip sheets are talking about CLOUDS

[skidaddle] 07/3/2011 08:47

"I'm not knocking nasa nor cloud computing per se, but I would be reluctant to believe that it is going to be the next big thing, and the conversion rate of existing software end users to cloud customers is obvously not so great as people are still very wary of the conept of having ALL their data stored on remote servers - even though they already unwittingly (?) do this with fb, gmail, hotmail etc etc"

All of these questions were put forward about a year ago for not taking up the cloud concept. However since then all of these concerns have been addressed one way or another. All I read now is that if you don't take up the cloud concept then you will rapidly be left behind by those who do over the next few years. Perhaps you just need to read more about it.

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 08:38

Thanks ARTY and thats very kind and understanding

[arty] 07/3/2011 08:36

I don't blame you sol,there is absolutely no need to reveal sources, if you do that then suddenly the information ceases. We continue to appreciate any insight or musings you feel able to share.

[solarno lopez] 07/3/2011 08:31

Sorry Max I just get nervous and don't want to cross the line

[nils214] 06/3/2011 20:05

P3psiMax - 5 Mar'11 - 13:33 - 3682 of 3689


Outstanding artical Skidz, thanks for posting!

I hope that creates some further interest here and brings in the next tranche of investors.

What I find really interesting is that if cloud computing and SAAS is being heralded the real future of the IT world and Nasstar are a leading light in this field why Charlie Black would sell his company for 25p a share when surely this could be worth 10's of times more than this in a couple of years?

Any comments chaps?

P3psi...a few...

fundamentals of a successful business...unique product and high barriers to entry thus reducing possibilities of competition. Does nasa hold a position where these parameters exist. Some simple questons to ask...do they have a unique product...errm no, any existing data storage company should be able to install systems allowing others to store data and us software off their servers.

Does nasa own its own software eg SAP, MS Office Suite, Autocad etc etc,...obviously they don't, so they would have to provide user licenses as I am sure the software companies will not be happy to sell them a singlepackage that can be used by 100mln people!? Therefor they would be buying licenses and then renting them out so they still have heir own internal capex costs.

I'm not knocking nasa nor cloud computing per se, but I would be reluctant to believe that it is going to be the next big thing, and the conversion rate of existing software end users to cloud customers is obvously not so great as people are still very wary of the conept of having ALL their data stored on remote servers - even though they already unwittingly (?) do this with fb, gmail, hotmail etc etc

aimho

[p3psimax] 06/3/2011 19:02

Solarno I'm not new to investing buddy I've been into Nasstar for the past 18 months and though I always find what you have to say about this company insightful and am aware from what you say you have a substantial holding of the company. I do often find it difficult to understand - how or where you source the information you disseminate on this forum.

Just for example, if I'd owned a Nasstar for as long as Charlie Black has and going off of the past financial results it would seem, unless something really bad happens over the next 10 months that this company will turn a profit at the end of this year and potentially, going off of articles like the one Skidz posted the other day could do very well for itself in the coming years. Why I would after years of graft getting things right and wrong would I choose to sell up for 25p-32p when if I continued to graft for another couple of years I could sell my company for £2.50 - £3.20 a share? Just for example?

You just sound so sure of yourself in some of your posts is all, I don't mean to cause offence, I would just like a bit more information.

[solarno lopez] 06/3/2011 08:36

I understand so

[skidaddle] 05/3/2011 23:32

"Love to think so SKID price suggested has been 25/32p if its higher so much the better"

But 6 months ago I remember you saying he would sell for around 20p. So the price is a moving target in an upwards direction. So long as the contracts materialise in due course.

[solarno lopez] 05/3/2011 19:31

P£PSIMAX are you new to investing?

[p3psimax] 05/3/2011 19:20

Suggested by who Solarno? I don't understand why you can't be more transparent about your connections/knowledge on this company?

And if Nasstar will/would be taken over, what companies would be prime candidates to take it over so we can buy those shares?