Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[slipperysidewinder] 23/12/2016 09:03

Kuss.

You, syd and firminator are the irrelevance. Whatever ME says or does, or doesn't do, you proffess it is meaningless. Whilst holders investment plummets.

This board has the three of you marked as flagbearers who are resigned to lose the lot if it comes to it. All very noble, but also very stupid and extremely naive. A saluatory lesson for watchers of this board.


Meldex reborn.

[slipperysidewinder] 23/12/2016 08:58

Whum

More reason to sell if you are a CEO involved in a company caught in the crosshairs.

[kuss1] 23/12/2016 08:56

slip, ME is an irrelevance to the scientific progress at Nano or to the companies that have signed up with them.

I'd be concerned if Nigel Pickett started selling mind you.

[whum] 23/12/2016 08:53

of far more concern is the game being played in America by Donald duck,
his appointment of Navarro as trade advisor does not bode well for
international commerce, and we are slap bang in the middle
the goose could be strangled before it has had chance to lay a golden egg..

[slipperysidewinder] 23/12/2016 08:51

The sad thing is that if ME ever did succeeed here, there would be none of the shareholders left who supported the company through the development phase whilst ME made wrong turn after wrong turn. This is the real irony.

[kuss1] 23/12/2016 08:45

Grabbed a few more on that dip...

9 months from now, Nano will have some $100 million plus manufacturing plant in Dow, Merck and Runcorn. Not bad for a tiny tech co.

ME's selling is an irrelevance to the industry, Dow or Merck or any of the big OEM's...

[fil340] 23/12/2016 08:37

I expected an RNS confirming contract with Chinese OEM for supply of Wah Hongs film. And got ME's slap in the face instead. The only reasonable thing to surmise from his sale is that a contract is not imminent, which is terrible news and quite bewildering to boot. I suspect contract delay has to do with WAh Hongs 100" line being unready at this time. Furthermore the share sale flags up ME having no knowledge of Dow sales, which he should have some clue about this close to CES. Good luck to the patient longs, I am sitting this one out.

[bagpuss67] 23/12/2016 08:36

Clearly some real evidence that nano's process is capable of commercialisation and thereafter has been so that it generates a reliable and increasing revenue stream.

[jfacwc] 23/12/2016 08:19

nano share price continuing to remain its usual 'festive' self (i.e. red..).what do we have to wait for to get finally some cheer for the loyal followers? Alignment of the planets??..

[syd777] 23/12/2016 05:36

Whum SSW AKA Jhon Henry recently after going long with the latters name is the same person as Henry keeps his word short and tries not to get caught out.Do not be fooled with slippys Avatar on here.MR OZ can't you tell by the same IP address?If not I can get my mates to hack into slippy easy.

[syd777] 23/12/2016 04:19

Lauders the markets got over that sale along with with big hitters like Bruice and expect more upward trend in the coming days leading upto and beyond CES.ME is fantastic when it comes to charity and we must not indulge too much on ones personal finances given the status he sold at 40.75,I am more concerned with Goldman Sachs increasing their holdings,and for what reason?

[lauders] 23/12/2016 04:09

I am trying to keep cool and hope that CES does NOT disappoint AGAIN syd!

We shall see if 2017 gets off to a good start or not soon enough!

Good we witnessed a nice rise at the end of the day yesterday. Would be nice to see that continue. Perhaps there was an overhang as our wonderful boss was trying to unload his shares on the market and now he is hopefully done we will see some strength. Can only dream. It is Xmas after all ;-)

[syd777] 23/12/2016 03:24

Lauders thanks.. Looks as if TCL and HiSence so far are onboard with Samsung working with DOW for duel supply from next year.Another 1 or 2 would do nicely,with under 2 weeks to go before we see what the avenues of the commercial status brings to the revenue.Hope you've got a Christmas tree with the humidity outhere helps keep the mind cool.Regarding MEs sale it was very good of him to donate 120.000 shares to charity before the US Tax end 31st December 16, and long may he do so as the markets today and the Chartists have looked beyond that.

[trycky] 23/12/2016 01:47

Perhaps this is ME playing a bluff, the CEO selling a small amount of his holding and creating an atmosphere of gloom thus depressing the share price and then perhaps buying back in at a lower price? Anyway "there is something rotten in the state of Denmark".

[lauders] 23/12/2016 01:08

This link within that text is the best part syd777:

FWIW - I agree that ME has once again kicked shareholders in the groin with his actions of selling at this time. It may not necessarily be the amount, it is just the FACT that he has ONCE AGAIN sold at these lower prices. Seems he doesn't really care about his fellow shareholders and the options just top-up his balance as we SLOWLY progress. I really hope that 2017 is NANO's year. We will get an idea from CES, but on past performance I am keeping my expectations very low. Come on NANO surprise us to the contrary please!

[whum] 22/12/2016 22:53

perhaps ME has a perverse sense of humour

[jfacwc] 22/12/2016 22:45

good to see the moderated comments!hardly time to run for the hills.just hope not too many ill-effects.

[mr.oz] 22/12/2016 22:39

Bagpus and Davros
Great posts, my sentiments entirely
I suggest people take an unbiased look again here and read those two posts again

[andycapped] 22/12/2016 22:19

I won't be selling, and I think it'd be unwise to do so at this point in time.

[onething] 22/12/2016 22:15

I agree with Davros. The very fact the CEO sells is the message, not whether it is only a small part of his overall holding. It was certainly held back until after the AGM. There are many private investors desperate to hear something concrete about the companies progress, but the only official communication we get us that the CEO thinks it makes sense to sell £150k of stock now rather that get double that in a few months time. Maybe he thinks that's the best price he will get anytime soon. Whether he has good reasons to sell or not, it just does not look that good.

[davr0s] 22/12/2016 22:03

It's not the % that's the issue - it's the message it sends, and he's done it 3 times now. Having worked in a small listed company the advisors will have been at pains to advise against this and previous sales for multiple reasons. I just sense the guy is a bit naive but regrettably so at shareholders expense, and doing rather well out of it given the business hasn't delivered commercially yet. I sold in spring as it was clear to me that the CEOs statements could no longer be trusted as they were repeatedly missed (the "multiple imminent commercial deals" 2 years ago sticks in the throat as it appears just a ruse to get the money raising away). I keep an eye on it just in case things change but today just reenforces why I need to continue to steer clear

[bagpuss67] 22/12/2016 22:02

personally i think slippy's comments sound fair. a big part of me feels like selling completely again. if you stand back its all a bit silly. ME sitting in the US purporting to run a UK business. Selling three times. No commercialisation, excessive costs on C suite and toys like a full listing> if they succeed it will be the market not good management.