Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[ih_169774] 21/11/2016 03:38

Do you even realize how desperate and foolish you look when you can't accept facts when they are clearly laid out? I'd love to see you come back with a real educated response instead of changing the subject or reverting to comparing Slippery's bashing to Crunch's well researched posts. If you fall in love with a stock, you're setting yourself up for confirmation bias, in which you embrace evidence that validates your thesis, and quickly reject contrary opinions.

[syd777] 21/11/2016 01:50

Lauders I'm dreaming of an RNS on the 23rd NOV.

[syd777] 21/11/2016 01:39

Crunch/SSW Your a big fool if you dont understand semi conductors and to say Nanoco uses Indium is fooling people here,, the difference is in the word BASED! Dose not mean it's Indium..Nanoco uses a range of non-toxic semiconductor alloys based on indium.

[ih_169538] 21/11/2016 00:34

OK man give it up already you are as wrong as wrong can be with validated info posted by more than me here.I'm trying to set you straight by posting facts so people can take you seriously.Think of it as an "intervention" for your own good.Posts based on facts instead of butterflies and rainbows would be preferred.

[syd777] 21/11/2016 00:23

I knew slippys Avatar would be here..I will ask ME the question at the AGM and ask why the interview was deleted fool.put your real name back up SSW!

[ih_169538] 21/11/2016 00:19

Because you dreamed it up..that's why it's not there.Thanks to the other factual posters for keeping it real.

[howl01] 21/11/2016 00:17

Have look at the rohs questionnaire responses Syd - it includes some composition information

[syd777] 20/11/2016 23:54

I have been through MEs interview on Edison and proactive investors about the use of Idium and strangely enough its not there any more he clearly stated they use a semi conductor material based on idium and not Idium as some have speculated.I don't know why that part of the interview has been deleted.

[syd777] 20/11/2016 23:04

Howl01 at least you have put that crunch were he needs to be with his lies.A QMC dreamer that's trying to get their share price up and his counting his loss.

[howl01] 20/11/2016 23:03

Agree 100% Kuss - but I would actually like Nanoco to develop some production base themselves as well - as a small (maybe not for long) business they are then able to react a lot faster to opportunities than the large corporations are able to too much red tspe. There's going to be some niche businesses interested which will probably have some very profitable margins but which the likes of Dow etc wouldn't entertain. Core activity R&D still but some production capacity would be good (and good for UK manufacturing!)

[howl01] 20/11/2016 22:18

nanoco dots use Indium - they do not use Indium Phosphide as do Samsung.

[v11slr] 20/11/2016 21:55

"Nanoco has developed a range of CIGS and CIS (copper indium gallium di-selenide/sulfide, copper indium di-selenide/sulfide) materials"

[ih_169538] 20/11/2016 21:51

.1 Synthesis of bio CFQD® nanoparticles
Bio CFQD® nanoparticles based on indium (In) compositions were manufactured in the laboratories of Nanoco Technologies Ltd., Manchester, UK using proprietary synthetic procedures following the patented molecular seeding process [53].

[ih_169538] 20/11/2016 21:48

Did you wake him up and ask him that ? ME has clearly not been clear on much IMO.Here's the link to dispute that comment you made.FACTS matter !

hxxp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961216303453

[syd777] 20/11/2016 21:43

Crunch:ME stated clearly Nanoco is not using Inidum as fools like you think get real and stop begging investors here to look into QMC,buy Nanoco shares and get a merry Christmas and a happy new year in your coffers.

[fil340] 20/11/2016 21:33

Nanoco not using indium - hxxp://www.displaydaily.com/article/152-display-daily/45523-connecting-the-quantum-dotters?utm_content=buffer5160b&utm_medium=social&;utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[howl01] 20/11/2016 21:25

IARC classify InP within Group 2A - probable carcinogen. As I understand it's not Indium that's a problem but specifically InP. On an oled rumour site there was a mention of leaked information on LG's new LCD 2017 models UJ & SJ series - anybody found anything? I am can't find it anywhere.

[ih_169538] 20/11/2016 21:22

Sydney did you not see the fact Nanoco is using indium even though you think they are not.At least come to the realization your are wrong more than you are right

[ih_169538] 20/11/2016 21:20

I won awards in grade 5 for long jump and high jump,it was a gold ribbon award.I never became a Olympic gold medal winner unfortunately.Those awards are great for hanging on an office wall, not for securing supply contracts.

[syd777] 20/11/2016 21:08

Crunch let's see who gets there first regarding bio-imaging..Time will tell and if this week an RNS comes with a tie up,then your history along with slippy.QMC might be a competitor by 2023.I have seen most bio tech companies trying to hold an advantage,is there anyway you could tell us what Nanoco is using for their awared after awared winning CFQDs?

[ih_169538] 20/11/2016 20:47

Once again Sydney..take to time to fact check.I know it's a chore but it's better than the guessing game and looking foolish everytime.

Here's one example of hundreds out there of indium in bio imaging

hxxp://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn901421v

Along with this one stating Nanoco's use of indium in bio imaging

However, one major drawback that severely hinders the clinical translation of QDs is the inherent toxicity of the individual ions (such as Cd2+, Se2− and Te2−) that the dots contain, particularly Cd2+ [42], [43] and [44]. For instance in study by Marchal et al. the detection of the SLN and the toxicity of the cadmium-containing QDs (CdTeSe/CdZnS) were compared with cadmium-free counterparts (CuInS2/ZnS) [45]. They also noted that the cadmium-based QDs clearly showed signs of toxicity, with inflammation evident in resected regional lymph nodes. However, the cadmium-free QDs did not show any signs of toxicity under the same conditions. Therefore, in recent years several groups have been interested in the fabrication of cadmium-free QDs for biological applications [46], [47] and [48].

QDs made up of III–V semiconductor nanocrystals (such as InP) are appropriate candidates as they do not have class A or B elements and also structurally are more robust owing to the presence of covalent bonds in their matrix [49] and [50]. Indium-based QDs are therefore a promising substitute for cadmium-based QDs for biological studies. Several other core-shell combinations including indium for Cadmium-free QDs have been investigated successfully for in vivo imaging [51] and [52].

Nevertheless, relatively few studies have reported the use of indium-based QDs in biomedical applications, since the synthetic procedure for preparing indium-based QDs is more complicated than cadmium-based QDs. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of new biocompatible water soluble indium-based QDs (bio CFQD® nanoparticles, Nanoco Technologies Ltd.) and investigate their applicability for in vivo axillary lymphatic mapping.

2 Materials and methods
2.1 Synthesis of bio CFQD® nanoparticles
Bio CFQD® nanoparticles based on indium (In) compositions were manufactured in the laboratories of Nanoco Technologies Ltd., Manchester, UK using proprietary synthetic procedures following the patented molecular seeding process [53].