Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[jfacwc] 23/1/2019 07:52

Nanoco may not be the only company supporting such initiatives, but at least they ARE one of them.Plus their drive to reduce overall energy usage, as well as huge developments in medical procedures, vehicle safety, fitness clothing, and the like.Makes it a totally worthwhile investment - if not so financially rewarding, ... yet.

[howl01] 23/1/2019 04:34

BBC News - Davos 2019: The man who thinks he can make us love kale

[roadster750] 21/1/2019 10:14

I noticed the Needham report referred to the partner as a "Large U.S. Strategic" for the first time, typical of Nanoco to use ambiguous terms, but I see that FLIR have a big military relationship!

[lauders] 21/1/2019 00:54

That would be a bit of a climb down fom Apple to say the least! As I said, Apple is no news until it is confirmed, IF ever! No indications that Flir have anything at all lined-up where NANO are concerned or they would have been likely including some hints in their CES round-up:

[howl01] 20/1/2019 21:20

FLIR look to have been very active at CES - there's lots of YouTube videos from their demos and talks on IR imaging.

[roadster750] 18/1/2019 14:24

New installation using plessey leds gives an idea of potential of future business

[from8to800] 17/1/2019 11:30

Those growth graphs are a beauty. One can only dream of it actually materialising.

[roadster750] 17/1/2019 11:07

Latest from Needham Growth Conference

[global nomad] 17/1/2019 09:15

has been pushing up to the one year day highs around 48p, what chance of breaking through?

[jfacwc] 16/1/2019 10:57

Cheers Roadster. hopeless with links.Actually posted that link in the hope nano IR would react in some way, and maybe address the issue for us.On that same subject, why on earth is there no follow-up report on nano cfqd successes at CES 19? There was a decent bit of hype (tweets) from them on 3 Jan ... . Think a lot of people here would welcome such info.

[ghaon] 15/1/2019 22:46

A bit more coverage:

hxxps://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/01/quantum-dots-shrink-pixels-from-30-microns-to-4-microns.html

[3raymo] 15/1/2019 22:03

Silly question but from that link I see the CEO of nanosys has managed to bag a spot as a speaker.....are we involved by chance? I couldn’t see anything....
Raymo

[notimpressed] 15/1/2019 21:25

from the link, the last sentence is the key that unlocks the door

In 2018 Quantum Dot technology entered the mainstream TV market for the first time with several great Quantum Dot display products available to consumers for well under $1,000. This major adoption milestone is the result of over 30 years of academic and commercial development from the earliest discoveries at Bell Labs until today. It’s also just the beginning for Quantum Dots.

[roadster750] 15/1/2019 21:08

jfacwc
swap with this link, ta

[smraynot] 15/1/2019 19:13

Exciting times ahead. Apple collaboration? a positive RNS could send NANO to £2+. Roll out the Nano's and let the fun begin.

[jfacwc] 15/1/2019 17:27

Maybe too much to expect, but considering current employees/directors at Nanoco, would have nice to see them mentioned somewhere in here:-hTTps://www.photonicconference.com/quantum-dots/agenda?_cldee=am9obmFsbGVuQGN3Yy51ay5jb20%3d&recipientid=contact-5387bbef2f0fe711b425005056bf096c-200790907e2f4bf684883fc4b095d1e4&utm_source=ClickDimensions&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Phosphor%20Global%20Summit%202019&esid=397ad4fa-d518-e911-a983-0022480053e9&urlid=2

[mwwh] 15/1/2019 13:07

Thanks, Roadster. Impressive and exciting. This possibly involves Apple. Since Deutsche Bank lent Plessey so much money, this is possibly how Deutsche bank learned of an Apple connection to Nanoco that they implied in a recent recommendation.

[roadster750] 15/1/2019 10:27

Lauders, that fact that we as owners of the company have to try and learn the state of play from the information given out by a competitor such as Nanosys, a private company for gods sake, speaks volumes about Nanocos shocking pr, not one tweet or update from ces, even after contacting the company for one, no mention of the passing of Professor Paul O'Brien the founder of the company when its competitors like ubiqd find the time to show respect on their site, its not about nda s with this bunch its either total incompetence or worse complete arrogance.

[3raymo] 14/1/2019 22:00

I do agree with you Rochdae, things are now finally coming to fruition. However, I remember a lot of hype over our apparent collaboration with the big S which went epically sideways....I will continue to hold as I’m a 5 year plus investor so I appreciate your comments (both now and all that time ago!).

[rochdae] 14/1/2019 20:48

If you look at the info. coming out of CES it's full of Qdot tech. Qled TV's and monitors and microLEDs with Qdot tech. So who are the companies able to supply? And that's just display. Nano has been building a separate sensor Qdot line at runcorn. We all know for whom, but the question is when the products will come to market.

Minor markets in other areas ... horticulture, cancer imaging etc..etc.. probably only a 10 billion or so short term.

Roch

[jfacwc] 14/1/2019 11:27

andy. I do think posters have an influence, yes.

[lauders] 14/1/2019 11:19

See Lauders still complaining about PR. That's going to be a 20 year old story in itself. Least he isn't blaming others for losing money. Progress of a sort.

Nice share price move at least.

Quite correct re: the PR. Will continue to bang-on about it until they can do a proper job at promoting their product and letting the world know about it. The non-disclosure excuse is very convenient!

As for blaming others for losing money, I have never done that as all investment decisions (good and bad) are my own and nobody elses. If I am stupid enough to invest in a dud or something like NANO that remains stagnant for years that is completely my fault. Perhaps you were thinking of the time that you you posted NANO was going in the right direction and thought I was blaming you for getting folk interested and suggesting they buy? Not at all, just thought your timing was perfect on that as NANO just reversed and has been going down ever since to only recently start heading in the right direction. Seems your timing is spot on again Rochdae as you just mentioned the nice share price move and it has started to decline again. Perhaps refraining from commenting on the direction may help? One day you may be right about NANO. As for the big A, there is still no clear evidence. Love it if there were, but until there is it is rumour, plain and simple.

[andycapped] 14/1/2019 10:58

Over half the company is owned by ii's, do you think they take any notice of what is written on message boards?

[mr.oz] 14/1/2019 10:55

BP, it's not possible.
Anyway.. Serves as a reminder how things really are 😁