We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.39 | -1.97% | 19.41 | 19.22 | 19.60 | 19.96 | 19.00 | 19.50 | 1,460,942 | 16:35:15 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0343 | 5.54 | 61.44M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/2/2018 08:44 | 'Nanoco will scale-up and mass produce novel nano-particles for advanced electronic devices ' - Advanced electronic devices? I suspect it isn't just TV's? I-phones?...god knows what that description may cover but the reference to 'mass production' is interesting as it does suggest the end product is a mass product | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 08:38 | this isn't quantum dots as we know them for display is it? Michael Edelman, Chief Executive of Nanoco, said: "This transaction not only exemplifies the potential of our technology, but also the recognition that Nanoco can continue to pursue broad partnerships in diverse markets. Our deep expertise in the development and mass production of highly differentiated nanoparticles has enabled us to create partnerships, and future revenue streams, with partners around the globe. We are very pleased to announce today's agreement, and we look forward to updating you on our progress." | bagpuss67 | |
08/2/2018 08:31 | lol, aren't the company a tease! More puff, or is this actually a material material agreement? | typo56 | |
08/2/2018 08:25 | Book is weakening | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 08:23 | I am not in this, but these technology companies try to avoid naming their customers. | leedskier | |
08/2/2018 08:23 | good depth on the book 20 v 14 (232k v 102k) | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 08:15 | now. the rns was rubbish..but the hope abounds that it could turn into something transformational. | bagpuss67 | |
08/2/2018 08:15 | good for you nowent, and notimp | jfacwc | |
08/2/2018 08:15 | hyper post 15923, if it was an aim listed stock I would agree, but it is n't | notimpressed | |
08/2/2018 08:10 | 1 v 4 sellers at 32p - usual resistance - if NANO had included numbers then 32p would be a memory Edison covers NANO so I am sure they'll provide a more comprehensive assessment of this deal sometime today or tomorrow | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 08:09 | 31p trades lol. Yeah, rubbish RNS ... | nowenterprise | |
08/2/2018 08:08 | in fact I do give credit here..for keeping this secret. that is a major improvement from the past... | bagpuss67 | |
08/2/2018 08:04 | The book looks stonking. she's gonna pop | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 08:03 | A listed American company. Not some ones granny | mrplay | |
08/2/2018 07:57 | That is just the worst rns. I've been watching this one for ages, watched the 18p placing and still saw no reason to pile in.Just awful management, no facts just signaling. | rathean | |
08/2/2018 07:57 | Shoring up the SP | mr.oz | |
08/2/2018 07:55 | I am sure insiders (brokers etc) will know who the customer is and no doubt the identity of the customer will emerge in the coming days | gersemi | |
08/2/2018 07:42 | I don't know what all this apparent need for secrecy is all about..Angle just announced a project and named Abbott no problem. It does make me question the substance here of the announcement. I already have a view on the substance of management. | bagpuss67 | |
08/2/2018 07:39 | Unnamed deal with unknown revenue - in fact content less. It could be the CEOs gran buying one dot for all we know. Pointless rns and I'm surprised the advisors didn't intervene and say as much. All this does is remind people how this company has operAted in recent years | davr0s | |
08/2/2018 07:37 | I would have thought there was already enough production capacity for Nano's dots with Dow,Merck etc without building more | davemac3 | |
08/2/2018 07:33 | Hehe, it looks like ME camping out on their doorstep and shaking his begging bowl actually worked! Fair play old bean......😂 | wynterwilde |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions