Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[mrplay] 03/11/2017 10:34

Getting worse on LSE. Nitwit removes negative but factual posts. Admits on premium chat he shorts. The worst type of investor the self-righteous type

[ih_169538] 02/11/2017 23:27

Oh..we know its fake news...nobody does it better than you do.I'm starting to think you are ME's twin brother ...is that the relationship ? Or are you MEs hand puppet ?

[ih_169538] 02/11/2017 23:22

Oh..we know its fake news...nobody does it better than you do.I'm starting to think you are ME's twin brother ...is that the relationship ? Or are you MEs hand puppet ?

[mr.oz] 02/11/2017 21:25

Tell me that you are having a laugh please

[syd7777] 02/11/2017 21:05

I have to admit that,I am related to ME.In my recent conversation with him,a few upcoming truths have been highlighted.1 QMC will go bust in 2018.2 Nanoco will be one of the best traded shares,after November the 15th right upto CES.3 DOW is about to come fully online with the demand for CFQDs before the World Cup.4 Kylux and Nanoco have moved aggressively forward with their JV and the big players like Apple,LG,Samsung are planning a bid for the both.5 WH by the end of November will be at full capacity for QD films.6 Merck will start small supplies from its limited facility in Germany for Monitors.It might all sound like fake news,but then again you never know ;)

[mwwh] 02/11/2017 15:05

Be careful that we don't offend the thin skinned cheerleaders on the LSE site. It seems to be okay for Lombard Odier to sell their stock, but not okay for posters on this site to add some reality to the overly rosy pictures on the LSE site. If a poster is always positive in spite of repeated management failures to meet milestones, is his/her opinion of any value? Some of these poster even attempt to rewrite history by implying that we should never have expected Nanoco to be profitable prior to 2020. Moreover, why are they so offended when we criticize management for blatant failure. Why would he/she do so unless connected somehow to management. I hope this is not the case, since it would be illegal for Nanoco to attempt to manage views on a blog.

[mrplay] 02/11/2017 12:47

Harp on about the past??? April this year on video ME stated "We the directors of the company believe that we will not need additional cash" 4-5 months later 18p cash call to himself and larger share holders that cashed out screwing the share price to buy back at the lower price.

6 minutes 40 seconds. The past is months not years ago.

[boris cobaka] 02/11/2017 12:13

Absolutely disgusting that a non exec participates in the scamming of existing investors. Surely a COI. They’re meant to keep a eye on the potential misdeeds and restrict excessive rewards for under delivery. Now this fella has his snout in the trough too. Immediate egm needed and vote of no confidence in the current board members and make-up. Heads need to roll and a little prison time would be most welcome...
Do it guys ffs!

[bagpuss67] 02/11/2017 09:30

jfacwc. they deserve slagging off for a wide range of reasons. But as you say thats all been said. What we could have hear though is a non exec who is on the remuneration committee and is supposed to be whiter than white filling his boots with discounted shares that weren't offered to the body of shareholders.

[jfacwc] 02/11/2017 09:12

Think it's pointless to constantly slag off the Board, and harp on the past. Need to be looking forward to any positives, and identifying them.Only way for getting the share price to rise? Each day is a new day.Shame there's so little energy spent in this regard, or maybe there is, but we don't hear.

[bagpuss67] 02/11/2017 08:25

Agree not again, but its worse they have allowed a non exec Brendan Cummins to participate

[mrplay] 01/11/2017 16:50

The pressure should now be on for them to deliver. Do not think anyone will listen to same BS. With ME constantly selling and now can recoup at 18p ready to sell for his annual "tax bill" (Yacht)

[andycapped] 01/11/2017 14:06

Got to be a big seller in the background, notified on a delay. There's a lot of buys today, so someone must be off-loading.

[jfacwc] 01/11/2017 12:45

little comment now on the bb. Hardly surprising.Any likelihood of decent news prior to (or even at, or just after) the GM?Actually more trading activity today - buys(?) - hard to tell.CES our next hope? (sorry Onething ..).

[syd7777] 01/11/2017 12:38

I had to buy a few more at these prices.

[nowenterprise] 31/10/2017 19:08

wjs81 you must have pasted the wrong url then because it had ShareTicker=NANO in it ...

[wjs81] 31/10/2017 16:24

For some reason I can't see the original post. Mr Oz might be able to shed light on that.

[wjs81] 31/10/2017 16:22

It was a link to the QMC board Nowenterprise

[ih_169538] 31/10/2017 15:46

Syd..FYI..LG nanoparticles are 1 NM in size ..Red Green and Blue QDs are larger

Quantum dots exhibit properties that are intermediate between those of bulk semiconductors and those of discrete molecules. Their optoelectronic properties change as a function of both size and shape.[5][6] Larger QDs (radius of 5–6 nm, for example) emit longer wavelengths resulting in emission colors such as orange or red. Smaller QDs (radius of 2–3 nm, for example) emit shorter wavelengths resulting in colors like blue and green, although the specific colors and sizes vary depending on the exact composition of the QD.[7]

[nowenterprise] 31/10/2017 15:35

Nooo... don't send Crunch over to lse Nano chat board! I like it over there ...

[loldemort] 31/10/2017 13:43

WRT Edelson: now that all the action in CFQDs is in the far east, not the USA, will we be getting a new CEO based in Singapore?

[ih_169538] 31/10/2017 13:22

LGs nanocell does not use qds.Those nano particles are NOT quantum dots.That tech is NOT like samsungs shelled QD made by Hansol.Please ...get facts sraight so your believable.

hxxp://www.lg.com/uk/tvs/NanoCellSuperMatch

hxxps://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=hxxps://www.wired.com/2017/03/samsungs-quantum-dots/amp&ved=0ahUKEwjT__7s-ZrXAhUW6WMKHegxDUoQFgh3MBE&usg=AOvVaw3Mem4ZJiqweOwIINxVS7bR&ampcf=1

[syd7777] 31/10/2017 01:59

Crunch,you have to look at Galleys statement carefully.Nanoco is the only company manufacturing CFQDs for variety of uses.QMC and its RND seems to be based on display,hence the word only before that statement.LG is using its own in house QDs”Nano Cell LCD displays is that they employ uniform particles just one nanometer in diameter”just like Samsung with Hansol.Neither company is manufacturing for commercial use.Nanoco is the only company manufacturing CFQDs commercially for variety of uses and LG and Samsung are both using CFQDs of their own making.It is not a surprise that both LG and Samsung have their own RND when it comes to CFQDs,with TCL taking the same route.The others will want the new nanotechnology and might be too far behind with RND and will rely on on Nanoco,QMC..for supply.The display market for CFQDs will generate big demand ,but the biggest money to be made will come from biotech.£1 million per KG and growing ;)

[ih_169538] 30/10/2017 02:53

Not the first time someone got their facts wrong.The Nanoco employee needs to get some facts straight about cad free suppliers besides themselves..how the heck does he think Samsung has been producing cad free tvs for the past 3 years ?? Their cad free isnt coming from Nanoco ( Hansol is the supplier )..makes one wonder how Nanoco can blatently back these statements.LG is NOT using their qd in a tv !! Another false statement.There has been a pattern of this behaviour of misleading investors from the top down for years.Not suprising really.