ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

21.00
0.10 (0.48%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.10 0.48% 21.00 20.75 21.45 22.00 20.75 20.85 1,576,703 16:35:02
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 6.05 67.1M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 20.90p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 24.40p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £67.10 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 6.05.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 29801 to 29821 of 54700 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1204  1203  1202  1201  1200  1199  1198  1197  1196  1195  1194  1193  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
02/9/2017
20:07
Howl... Good post
mr.oz
02/9/2017
19:24
I don't personally think there's any doubt about the quality of the technology. Can't honestly see the likes of Merck, Dow and Wah Hong wanting to associate themselves with a bad product. There is clearly an issue with volume demand for CFQD, and it's been pretty well pointed out to us what that issue is- the 2019 extended date for cadmium exemption. It's taken the heat off the manufacturers to implement cad free screens.

I can't honestly see it is much of a leap to go from cadmium to cad free, it's supplied as a film after all, same as the cadmium product and I would think it would simply require a few tweaks of the colour calibration to adjust screens to the new film.

In my view the chief hope for earlier adoption will be if Samsung hammer home the message that their product is greener and less toxic. If that has a material affect on rivals sales, then they may wish to use CFQD earlier than is required by legislation.

andycapped
02/9/2017
18:08
it was all explained at the april update
sinbad74
02/9/2017
18:07
hxxp://www.graphene-nownano.manchester.ac.uk/our-research/


nanoco 2d is for the graphene QD they are working on

sinbad74
02/9/2017
16:46
It is true, the long time pumpers have long gone. Soon only the bears will remain, and that inevitability will tell its own story.
slipperysidewinder
02/9/2017
16:39
mrplay

Nothing is far fetched here. I heard Nano are thinking of employing Bernie Madoff as an advisor to the board. Lol

slipperysidewinder
02/9/2017
16:34
Why did Mike & Pickett set up the other nanoco company recently. Could the new company buy up all the old companies ips with funding from other source??? Conspiracy maybe but was is the reason for second company.
mrplay
02/9/2017
16:32
This is looking increasingly like a good buy with market moving in its favour, but at what price ? After the cash call perhaps ?
weatherman
02/9/2017
16:29
Is it definitely a ban or suggestion which then can be extended again?
mrplay
02/9/2017
16:06
"In particular, and given that even one of the resident bears concedes the CFQD market is "inevitable"

Its inevitable as seen by the ban in 2019 thats why I said that.Its now also inevitable that a cash call is coming ( even their analyst is suggesting it ) so why buy at this level when you can buy at a 30% discount.If your so confident Nano can mass produce high quality materials at low cost then your going to have to wait and see if thats true.So far there has been a commercial sale of unknown size or dollar value and no sales from Dow or Merck.Osram dropped them..Solar is now off the board..I fail to see how you dont see how the current events are not the reason for the fall in share price If you like the koolaid at this price then keep throwing your money down the drain.To say its a buy right now is ludicrous when you know its going down further.A few here were topping up at 40p saying it was a great buy..The other shoe is about to drop here..you know its true when tbe long time pumpers like kuss and his other multiple identities have disappeared.

ih_169538
02/9/2017
15:34
I find myself invested in a company (yes still invested) in which I no longer have confidence in the CEO. I don't have any doubt of the market (albeit delayed) or Nanoco's potential to take considerable share, but ME's obvious disdain for shareholders is worrying - and the silence continues breeding gossip and rumour. I'm not sure what part he has to play any more - commercial looks focused on Asia (Pang/Yao) and summit/conference attendance handled by Pickett & Gally. He's not got a finger on operational activity since he's remote and his handling of commercial and business strategy has been poor which has left us in a weak current situation. Maybe the writing is already on the wall for him but I would like to see him go before any asset stripping.
howl01
02/9/2017
15:07
And by the way. Thr selling of IP hae all ready started with the lighting IP up for sale. The IP will be sold at a pittance if at all.

This is part of the contingency plan that was to take place if things did not go well. The cutting back on staff has also occured. Edison have even gone bearish.

All of which I told the board before you even turned up on the scene. I have also repeatedly told the board the eu would give a cadmium extension. It happened!!


Lap it up!

slipperysidewinder
02/9/2017
15:01
Your a newbie dreamer WW.

We've seen lots of you crash and burn here.

slipperysidewinder
02/9/2017
14:50
"After criticizing and harrasing me for weeks you've certainly changed your tune."???The post was copied and pasted from early May. Go look. You are harassed because you fabricate stuff and appear to wallow in other people's losses - not something I'd waste my life doing.So why did you close that profitless short at 35p?
wigwammer
02/9/2017
14:08
WW good post.
syd7777
02/9/2017
12:13
Andy - I agree those are reasonable questions, and with the shares falling there is a tendency to focus on what we don't know. But in a broader sense there is a lot we DO know. Have attached my first post from early May, most of it still relevant. In particular, and given that even one of the resident bears concedes the CFQD market is "inevitable", it is very possible a larger player is willing to exchange a couple of years further losses for 20 years worth of IP.wigwammer - 06 May 2017 - 18:02 - 11448 of 14190 - 7Thanks Lauders,Yes - the market appears to be growing and sizeable. Samsung continue to believe QD technology has a long and diversified path ahead of it - who am I to argue - and Nanoco remains one of only a handful of QD players, and one of an even smaller number supplying cadmium free product. Additionally, I think it is unlikely the company disappears - they are debt free and have shareholders with deep resources, including Henderson. The current burn rate is high - £10m pa, but only 1/7th of the market cap - and that market cap is supported by a number of meaningful off balance sheet assets - the patent portfolio, partnerships and so on. So the market is there and the company, while loss making, has access to capital. The question is therefore one of timing. If they achieve meaningful orders over the next 6 months - shares will be £1+. Worst case - it takes 18 months - shares drop to 20p, circa 20% dilution, realisation of orders = shares rally to circa 80p. Either way a sensible portfolio position with great potential over a medium term horizon. I think there is a good chance the assets are bought out well before this. Merck and Dow are evidently interested in this area, and I suspect they are less bothered than the average pi about whether the orders arrive over 6 or 18 months.Best wishes, ww
wigwammer
02/9/2017
11:59
The share that ME &co get for free are now subject to the achievement of performance conditions (one of them being, if I remember correctly, that the share price should be higher than 200p during 2018/19 :). "As set out in the Company's Annual Report, the vesting of the options is subject to the achievement of performance conditions based upon share price growth and revenue targets over the three year performance period commencing with Nanoco's 2016/2017 financial year. Ordinarily, the options will vest (subject to the achievement of the performance conditions) following the announcement of Nanoco's results for its 2018/2019 financial year and will be released to the participants following the end of a two year holding period."
balaura
02/9/2017
11:48
Slippy - I think a man also once suggested putting your money where your mouth is.In your case, that would suggest a large sum of money.Yet you closed your profitless short position at 35p.Why?
wigwammer
02/9/2017
11:33
I think there some fundamental questions the board needs to provide answers to.

What has happened to the sampling by Samsung of Dow QD's mentioned tail end of 2016. Did they reject them on technical grounds, or still too expensive, or was it just wishful thinking projected out loud?

Secondly we need to know how much resin has been shipped to Wah Hong, and whether that will be a recurring order.

Thirdly, will the senior management be forgoing or at least defer their bonuses based on the fact they've failed to deliver on any product. That alone would save a considerable amount of cash.

I don't think these are unreasonable questions bearing in mind the present share value and rapidly depleting financial resources.

andycapped
02/9/2017
11:25
Wigwammer

Buffet also says two other things. "Never invest in a business you know nothing about" and "Cash reserves keep a business breathing".

Just saying

slipperysidewinder
02/9/2017
11:11
Mrplay

I told the whole board the ban would not come into force for a considrable time. I've said all this for 3 years. I was dismisssed. Holders here seem to be more like fantasists.

No matter what. There will be manufacture of cadmium TV's into the next decade.

Its about lobbying, jobs, manufacturing plants, bureaucracy, big business, back handers and compramise.

slipperysidewinder
Chat Pages: Latest  1204  1203  1202  1201  1200  1199  1198  1197  1196  1195  1194  1193  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock