Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

[mr.oz] 01/9/2017 22:41

Syd. What's the difference between just below 25 and now
Make some sense for us

[ih_169538] 01/9/2017 22:16

Arent you really ME ?..hiding under the guise of a poster named Syd 😂

[syd7777] 01/9/2017 20:45

ME still gets my vote and I'm hanging on a edge of a buy below 25.It was coming with a Lombard bail out.See what Monday and the volume holds in store, might wait for the 20 then.It looks good on the short positions down to 3.44 from 4.1

[slipperysidewinder] 01/9/2017 19:27

You could call a extra ordinary general meeting and have a vote to remove him from the board. A vote of no confidence.

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 18:47

I think that would be piling good money on bad.

The company have been measured in what they say, to the point where we don't really have any claim against them beyond a certain amount of bombast.

We have a simple choice now, we stay in and see what pans out, risking the potential for further loss, or we sell out now at a guaranteed loss and if you think the share will go down further, short the stock to recover losses.

[ih_169538] 01/9/2017 18:11

Bagpuss..all I could suggest is a shareholder lawsuit if that is your thoughts.I am surprised there hasn't been any noise from the larger investors who placed at 105P when ME was touting great things about to happen.

[minsky] 01/9/2017 17:33

Would the last one here please turn off the lights.
Thank you.

And don't forget that old propagator in the corner.
And the three prototype TVs dumped on the bed.

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 16:46

Quite a few more larger auto sells today, so wouldn't be surprised to see LO reducing their position yet again.

[slipperysidewinder] 01/9/2017 16:40

This is what makes me believe that the order is as my scources tell me. Not significant. And, yet again there are no figures.

Basically, the company is trying to make a single snowflake look like an avalanche of orders.

All to keep the traveling snake oil sideshow on the road to nowhere.

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 16:36

In my view if they had something to crow about at this stage, they'd be doing so.

The fact that any news is vague, with a lack of specifics says a great deal.

I can't see how it would be breaking any confidentiality for instance to state how many kg's of resin have been shipped to Wah Hong.

So who will it be that applies pressure to Nanoco's board, the institutional investors?

[bagpuss67] 01/9/2017 16:12

fair point but this is way more specific in its implication..albeit still we cant really believe it..

The Group's key short-term focus is on 10 TV and monitor projects with five companies

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 16:11

There shouldn't be any bonuses or free shares handed out, they haven't delivered on this heir promises.

[robotface] 01/9/2017 16:05

Autumn starts today and so time inches ever closer to ME's annual share sale for 'tax efficiency' purposes. They said they were dealing with 9 OEMs years back, 1 commercial sale has ultimately resulted at undisclosed quantities. At a rate of 1 in 9, 13 OEMs means nothing statistically.

[mr.oz] 01/9/2017 15:58

SSW made a valid point a while back, contracts require due diligence.

We could be seeking funding first, bigger contracts later. Unless they come as a pair which does not have to be particularly fair

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 15:15

Nanoco have a very extensive and expesnive BOD. I think the majority of those can be handed their cards, as they're not value for money. Same goes for all the non executive roles.

We want the engineers, scientists and production people and someone that can go out there and get the sales, if they exist.

[bagpuss67] 01/9/2017 15:05

remember Mr Griffiths was out some time ago? having bought back in not so long ago? what made him do that?

[andycapped] 01/9/2017 15:01

Seems the ii's got a weeks heads-up on the report from Edison, that's when they really started offloading, although it only appears to be one, Lombard odier that have reduced in any reportable quantity.

[mr.oz] 01/9/2017 15:01

I'd agree with your comments BP now and fits in with my previous lack of apparent accountability
I was OK with the TU, prepared to wait for some indication dual sourcing the big S was in the wings
I was thinking they were maybe under promising with the Note ( learning from mistakes)
IFA was yet another damp squib.

This has the feel of a scam

[bagpuss67] 01/9/2017 14:33

Worse. It seems that major shareholders have traded based on the true position not the spin in the rns's. How many times have we seen all this before. Nothing ever gets done about it.

[bagpuss67] 01/9/2017 14:30

Crunch. That's my point. It should not be acceptable for the directors of a listed company supervised by a Nomad to make statements that are misleading (if indeed they turn out to have been). The statements at the prelims and in the "trading" update do not seem to tally with reality or the Edison note.

[ih_169538] 01/9/2017 14:09

"I've got some magic beans for sale" Bagpuss..thats what the company has told you

[slipperysidewinder] 01/9/2017 13:45

Are we about to breach 25?

[slipperysidewinder] 01/9/2017 11:21

Mrplay

What makes me laugh is I told you all of this moons ago.