Mulberry Share Discussion Threads

[brownie69] 01/2/2017 13:15

Grossly overvalued. PE 237!! Fashion changes and soon Mulberry will be yesterdays news.

A good short at anything above 800p

[clocktower] 14/10/2016 11:27

Still heading in the right direction, the current state of the Pound should help sales.

[clocktower] 14/3/2016 12:51

Maybe their Spring Sales Collections have started well and the prospects are looking much better than they were six months ago.As you say the recovery coould well be under way - little downside now imo.

[irenekent] 14/3/2016 12:31

If it holds 1000p it bodes well. Recovery underway.

[purav] 19/10/2015 17:40

IG won't do borrow on this. Anyone know who might?

[kibes] 25/9/2015 11:04

Price continues to stick like glue to 900p, is this manipulation or what?

[kibes] 28/8/2015 13:37

What is controlling the price of this share at exactly 900p? Is it suspended or under offer or something?

[dlku] 07/6/2015 15:44

main on sunday - profit collapse at mul

[hereford29] 04/4/2015 18:46

Perhaps, but why would Christina Ong want to undermine her own business? I think it is more likely to be an inept Board who lucked out during the Boom after the 2008 crisis in riding the affordable luxury wave and the renewed confidence in the UK retail market, then shot themselves in the foot by trying to be a luxury designer brand, when it is perfectly obvious the Asian market including PRC loves all things British and yet reasonably affordable. That's why Burberry does so well. And that's probably why they picked the name Mulberry in the first place. There are really strong talented UK MDs who would make a much better job of leading this business profitably and driving expansion in Asia.

[irenekent] 03/4/2015 09:12

Totally agree Hereford. Must be the influence of the Ongs.

[hereford29] 01/4/2015 13:21

They have since appointed a CEO from a luxury jewellers and a creative Director from a mass market eurobrand, it is supposed to be a British company with an affordable luxury cachet aimed at the discerning buyer. Neither of these gentlemen have worked in a similar business model. Why have they not learned from he last CEO appointment, whose disastrous leadership alienated the design engine of the company, decimated the companies profitability and upset the core customer base. Clearly as a quintessentially British brand it needs an English CEO and an English Creative Director.

[hereford29] 01/4/2015 13:18

They have appointed a CEO from a luxury jewellers, a creative Director from a mass market eurobrand, it is supposed to be a British company with an affordable luxury cachet aimed at the discerning buyer. Neither of these gentlemen have worked in a similar business model. Why have they not leaned from he last CEO appointment, hose disastrous leadership decimated the companies profitability and core customer base market share. Clearly as a quintessentially British brand it needs an English CEO and an English Creative Director.

[hereford29] 01/4/2015 13:18

They have appointed a CEO from a luxury jewellers, a creative Director from a mass market eurobrand, it is supposed to be a British company with an affordable luxury cachet aimed at the discerning buyer. Neither of these gentlemen have worked in a similar business model. Why have they not leaned from he last CEO appointment, hose disastrous leadership decimated the companies profitability and core customer base market share. Clearly as a quintessentially British brand it needs an English CEO and an English Creative Director.

[clocktower] 30/3/2015 10:22

Prada`s figures show the decline in the luxury markets Mulberry serves. Must be tough fighting to swim against the tide of decline.

[irenekent] 23/12/2014 11:27

I note that they seem to be recovering slightly. Maybe Christmas handbag buyers have decided to support the home team. Mulberry's Christmas video is a hoot, although it does seem to imply that its clientele are spoilt upper middle class snobs! I'd better shut up.

[irenekent] 23/12/2014 11:27

I note that they seem to be recovering slightly. Maybe Christmas handbag buyers have decided to support the home team. Mulberry's Christmas video is a hoot, although it does seem to imply that its clientele are spoilt upper middle class snobs! I'd better shut up.

[andy pipkin] 14/10/2014 18:00

You fellas scared me. Sold at the close. I've had worse days.

[williemanjaro] 14/10/2014 09:15

Independent headline-"Mulberry issues new profit warning as lower-priced strategy fails to deliver"

Lower price....well thats a start.

The mistake MUL initially made was to take on Prada and the like with "We dont want to sell t-shirts for £150, sell them for £300"!

[clocktower] 14/10/2014 09:09

No mention was made about production at the new factory, in view of the huge decrees in sales. Must be a serious worry and are overheads out of control?

[angus17] 14/10/2014 08:48

market cap £345m for what is surely just a brand at the end of the day. Weird world we live in.

[andy pipkin] 14/10/2014 08:42

I'm in. Looks value now.