Motif Bio Share Discussion Threads

[scottdavid70] 26/10/2020 21:33

Do not tolerate any of this fake news and scaremongering. The alternative?

To be treated by the laws as shareholders we should be.

Stay strong and there is an alternative I can assure you all

[scottdavid70] 26/10/2020 21:32

Remember Bobby is on LSE to stoke your fears:

1) he talks of delisting to scare you

2) massive dilution to frighten you

However, in time he will try to make you feel that dilution is better than the alternative. It isn’t trust me

[scottdavid70] 26/10/2020 20:03

Have emailed the FCA today to ask about recourse here as we have had no updates/communication on why this potential SIGNIFICANT DILUTION would be necessary given we were told we were fully funded through to end of January 2021, why it’s in shareholders best interests and what is the situation surrounding trying to dis-apply pre-emotion rights in 2020 without engaging/conversing with current shareholders about why this would be in their best interests.

I would suggest others on here do the same. Email address is:

[e-mail]

[scottdavid70] 26/10/2020 19:59

Anyone here back from the company about why they said they were fully funded on the 5th May to the end of January 2021 but then NEARLY 4 MONTHS....yes 4 MONTHS before that date and JUST 5 MONTHS after that RNS say shareholders might be further SIGNIFICANTLY DILUTED???

[scottdavid70] 26/10/2020 19:55

Good to see Bobby back on LSE we know his IP address and Rapidly on here. 2 non holders posting only on a share they stand to make no upside or downside. Strange waste of lives but each to their own I guess

[scottdavid70] 25/10/2020 20:01

If all bases were covered in 2019 why are we still getting RNS’s saying that a RTO may not be completed by January 2021?

Anyone else not understand what ‘all bases covered’ means also if it doesn’t mean ‘all bases covered’?

[scottdavid70] 25/10/2020 05:54

The only base that was actually covered was Lumsdens bank account if we are being honest isn’t?

[scottdavid70] 25/10/2020 05:53

Also does “all bases covered” as Lord Lumsden said so famously (they will probably put that quote under his statue at the London Stock Exchange for a lifetime achievement award) suggest the company would be suspended, 3 months from de-list, 3 further capital raises, a vote at a General meeting to even keep the company afloat, unable to sell its only asset in a year when antibiotics are all the rage and zero updates on any upside for Iclaprim despite several announcements last year suggesting there would be?

[scottdavid70] 25/10/2020 05:46

Loaded Lumsden once said that Motif could be worth a £1. Yet here we sit suspended and at £0.05p and the man beloved he is owed a BONUS!!!

Please justify that to me?

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 20:08

These examples will matter when this final chapter is written and the TRUTH of what hard working ordinary people who invested here have suffered through.

Institutional investors and companies will be very reticent to hire individuals whom so much is known about in how they dealt with investors previously

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 20:06

No investors are going to touch Directors who also attempted to disapply pre-emption rights WITHOUT engaging in conversations with investors to explain and outline why that is the right course of action. By not ENGAGING AT ALL it certainly felt that it wasn’t in any of the investors best interests otherwise a explanation would have been forthcoming before or even after.

NONE HAS BEEN TOTAL RADIO SILENCE

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 19:24

Lumsden reputation is stock that has been suspended and about to be delisted too. His work future is intertwined entirely with the outcome here. He should do the decent thing if he won’t resign to state he doesn’t deserve and won’t take a BONUS. If there is any further SIGNIFICANT DILUTION his own personal reputation will be bankrupt unlike his own personal ban account. However, if he wants to work again the next announcement is a very SIGNIFICANT for him and the BoD. No investors will touch any of them again if they say things in RNS’s such as ‘fully funded’ and then 5 months later say those investors may well suffer SIGNIFICANT DILUTION

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 12:00

The greed-o-meter and grotesque goings on here will always be remembered.

Why were there 2 liver experts on stand by for a potential Ad comm meeting that never materialised? What data stopped the FDA from even bothering from even having that meeting prior to their FDA decision on the 14th February 2019?

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 11:57

USD $332,000 for Director fees, employee/consultant compensation, including share-based
payments.

Never forget the 2020 Interim results

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 08:46

The world is changing on many levels and the injustices we see are being recalibrated and adjusted for the unfairness that they are. This is my mission now and I have the luxury of time and money to see it through

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 08:44

I will change how shareholders are completely ignored when get ask questions that are relevant but uncomfortable. Their rights have to be respected properly again

[scottdavid70] 24/10/2020 08:43

I am going to change the way complete response letters contents are kept private. I am going to change how Directors can say things like “all bases covered” when actually that isn’t the case at all. I will change how you can say “fully funded” to finish a deal and then 5 months later potentially SIGNIFICANTLY DILUTE investors again.

[scottdavid70] 23/10/2020 21:52

I am going to make all of them more famous for being involved here than they could have dreamed of if we get screwed again. I am that angry and motivated

[scottdavid70] 23/10/2020 21:50

Narrow the focus here Chuffer - their reputations are the only currency they have ultimately. No matter the unearned fees all the 4 major entities have made here. Without leaving here with their reputations in tact no investment house or investor will touch them again

[chuffer2] 23/10/2020 20:59

As l have always said.
The AIM market is a petrit dish filled with scum directors who are mainly fraudsters.
This bod are no different and any deal if it comes will certainly not be the best one for shareholders but will undoubtedly be the best one for the bod in terms of backhanders and remuneration play-offs.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit it they get paid behind the scenes not to get any rto through and let's face it even the worst deal is better than none
This is why 95% of my money is in the Ftse.

[scottdavid70] 23/10/2020 18:52

The media spotlight and microscope are on them for their next move. It’s a powerful magnifying moment for investors domestically and the fallout will be immense if the rules are not followed. The last chapter will be written one or another soon

[scottdavid70] 23/10/2020 18:49

However with these entities Motif’s BOD, Peel Hunt, share price Angel and Walbrook all displaying traits of pure machiavellianism who knows when it will be announced but the voting down of the action to disapply pre-emption rights has thrown a spanner in the wheel of greed

[scottdavid70] 23/10/2020 18:47

Term sheet to deal is about 4 weeks. This ain’t complicated so there is no reason for a deal not to be announced by the 12th November latest.

Obviously its clear the term sheets were in play before the 12tb so it should be sooner