Mobile Streams Share Discussion Threads

[purchaseatthetop] 05/7/2022 15:51

I showed you why there is a cash burn. Disprove it. I was only using their own RNSs. Are they lies?

[dubois] 05/7/2022 15:22

Idiot - totally Pethetic. Either grow up or go away.No more replies from me, you're just a waste of time and energy

[purchaseatthetop] 05/7/2022 14:30

Dubois. Let me give you a little clue. If MOS are still burning cash now with this higher revenue then there will be a new placing rather soon. Have you spotted the fact that no RNS ever moves the share price now? It is because the more pointless RNSs you release the less effective they become.

Investors need clear view over real data.

[dubois] 05/7/2022 13:02

Idiot- grow up and get a life

[purchaseatthetop] 05/7/2022 12:17

Dubois. The cash burn rather suggests the contribution from the higher gross revenues is actually falling. Any comments?

[dubois] 05/7/2022 11:11

Idiot, grow up and get a life

[purchaseatthetop] 05/7/2022 10:59

Idiot grow up. Is that balanced enough? We both can post it. What is your view of why massive cash burn despite the supposed huge revenues is still happening?

[dubois] 05/7/2022 07:56

purchaseatthetop - you are an idiot that must one day grow up.

I simply prefer to look at everything and take my own balanced view thank you.

[rmsl1] 05/7/2022 07:49

quite a small pay for 6 mths worth of work as director tbh...

[hazelst] 05/7/2022 07:03

Charity thief at large!

[dubois] 05/7/2022 06:49

Idiot grow up

[purchaseatthetop] 05/7/2022 04:46

18/3/22 RNS says cash at 31/12/21 was £1.4m
15/3/22 raises £1.2
18/3/22 Krunchdata RNS cash outflow of £265k

Therefore if MOScwas trading at cash breakeven current cash would be £2.35m

4/7/22 RNS says cash or equivalents (hence including Gfin shares) is £1.8m
Therefore cash burn in H1 22 was £535k. Nearly £100k a month.

Not quite the rosy revenue picture being painted.

[tommyknockers1] 04/7/2022 16:37

Kapow PATT

[dubois] 04/7/2022 15:36

Idiot, grow up

[purchaseatthetop] 04/7/2022 15:04

Well argued Dubois. How about justifying the listed £3m “given” to insiders and connected companies for absolutely nothing tangible in return.

[dubois] 04/7/2022 14:00

Grow up idiot

[purchaseatthetop] 04/7/2022 13:52

Citycanary.
MOS have given….
£500k to Quantas Media Group
£250k to Gfin
£350k or whatever to Pumas.
£250k to Tim Scoffham
£1.5m to Krunchdata owners

None of these have ever demonstrated any commercial worth. So I am cynical.

[citycanary] 04/7/2022 13:47

The initial cash payment, money up front etc is unfortunately standard practice when you work with such a large club, (e.g. MUFC THFC Barcelona etc). The reason is that you expect to make money trading on their brand and they have the whip hand in the negotiation initially. We experienced this when dealing with one of the big 6 UK football clubs.

Looking at the given details under these circumstances, the deal is actually quite reasonable and should hopefully deliver handsomely.

GLTA

[dubois] 04/7/2022 13:11

Idiot ignore

[zico01] 04/7/2022 12:42

At last a very decent contract.

[purchaseatthetop] 04/7/2022 12:30

The RNS says that MOS are required to make an initial cash payment to Puma that is well covered by the existing cash of £1.8m. It does not say how much. Clearly that is an awful deal. NFTs are a dead industry down 95% in the last year.

A cue for another placing maybe?

Just my view.

[dubois] 04/7/2022 12:27

idot, ignore

[purchaseatthetop] 04/7/2022 12:23

Have you ever seen such an awful deal. Paying up front for it.