We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mi-pay Group Plc | LSE:MPAY | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0N59376 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.20 | 1.00 | 1.40 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/6/2017 13:04 | Bewarepaul Who is Quotes4U?Do you know them? | glenbo1 | |
15/6/2017 12:54 | "had previous names in the past" Did you not read the above ? | bewarepaul | |
15/6/2017 12:50 | So you have never been hatetrader then bewarepaul?? | glenbo1 | |
15/6/2017 12:38 | Glenbo You still do not get it, if he buys a share for 0.4p and sells for 0.5p and then later it goes to 2p he pretends he still holds and boasts of multibaggers, some of the stocks might bag but he is not doubling or trebling his money believe me. We can all go on twitter and do the same but 95% are not out to mislead our followers but he is, of course all the losers are never mentioned again, he is very clever at what he does. I have one name this name, had previous names in the past but I've nothing to hide. | bewarepaul | |
15/6/2017 12:34 | Well we shall see.Several bags this week cannot be bad but hey ho Each to their own. I am no mug as you put it..I imagine you have several accounts on here..... | glenbo1 | |
15/6/2017 12:05 | The person that impersonates him is buystock (dice1950) who has around 30 accounts now on twitter @smallcappick is his main one | bewarepaul | |
15/6/2017 12:00 | Bewarepaul Why do you slag off people on Twitter.The guy you are talking about has done VERY well lately.He does have someone who is impersonating him though. | glenbo1 | |
15/6/2017 11:34 | It's not good for proper shareholders as we seem to get ever low after low when the punters realise and sell | battlebus2 | |
15/6/2017 11:19 | Thought that, can't understand who follows and buys? | battlebus2 | |
15/6/2017 10:48 | NT to buy going to move up again | reks | |
15/6/2017 09:55 | Looks like another pump but still lots of buys going through. We will see. | battlebus2 | |
14/6/2017 22:43 | Hi ApHave a look at this.MPAY compared to BNNTo me this has incredible potential. I would welcome your thougjts | glenbo1 | |
14/6/2017 21:48 | Either not much free float and it's just hit that point where it couldn't fail to move as a small group did a last half hour raid to spike it. Or news leaked. Either way, rns in the morning for sure... o/t for another with limited free float. Worth taking a look at OMIPCurrently having their tcat music copyright and usage analysing tool trialled by a major record label. Ground breaking. It's going to be very useful to the whole music industry. Watch this space. Tcat is going to be worth a lot. OMIP is Revenue generating, debt free, profitable, cash in bank, dividend payer. also, upcoming men n motors shows, YouTube hits gathering pace, exclusive agreement with getting images, ever expanding music catalog.Only 71m shares in issue, and all the directors own a massive chunk, ceo and founder, M.Infante previously held 50%. Hardly any free float available. Market cap £2milli 5 bagged on it previously too. Take a look. A sniff will move it. . | apfindley | |
14/6/2017 18:59 | Yes very interesting and 40% up on the day on the back of buy volume. Maybe a contract renewal or the likes we will see because if it's a pump the shares will do a similar thing to the recent spike and fall back down again. Fingers crossed 🤞 | battlebus2 | |
14/6/2017 18:16 | Late buy at over 19p, looks like a leak before news! | casano | |
14/6/2017 16:04 | Up 25% again, surely not another pump and dump, five trades totalling 110k of shares so someone is interested. | battlebus2 | |
24/5/2017 21:55 | Yes the old ACZ business (which was sold for £4m on 2.5 x ebitda) seems to have gone from strength to strength. Currently making about £2.4m ebitda. One can only imagine where we'd be if we still owned that business. Certainly better than the £4.7m market cap (pre Mi Pay placing) that we currently are, especially as in 2015 ACZ paid it's shareholders a £2.25m dividend...(that's about 7p a share in old money). Not Leek's finest hour... | stemis | |
24/5/2017 11:58 | Like SteMiS I ended up in this share after making a sensible value investment in ACZ and unfortunately seeing James Leek take us along this poorly judged misadventure. Very annoyingly I have rather more share than SteMis :o( Since the Reverse Takeover I have been following things pretty closely and have obviously been dismayed to see the share price drop. My impressions are as follows: - The chairman has done a great job of streamlining the company and making it more efficient. He has a very impressive CV and we would be totally lost without him. I think under the bonnet the company is now pretty tightly run and has some good people except .... - The CEO is a waste of space and hopefully won't be around forever as he seems to like to disappear off to other projects rather than achieve anything. - If we can win new business then the operational efficiencies will magnify profits very sharply. But we need to win new contracts !! - The Reverse Takeover was more or less sold on the Philippines contract which has so far come to nought. It just seems that right now Asia is content to keep buying paper top-up vouchers and meanwhile the number of competitors within our business just keeps increasing for when the transition to electronic payment starts to happen. Our value-added fraud business seems low down the mobile operators list of priorities over there with vouchers removing that risk and simply writing a set of T&Cs absolving themselves of any responsibility for online fraud being the other zero-cost alternative. - In Europe I expect the market to continue to grow as I can see people actually reverting back to PAYG. But the number of operators in this growing market is static at best. The virtual operator market seems to be shrinking as we saw with the short-lived Post Office Mobile and Mobile By Sainsburys ventures. So the opportunities are fewer but increasing in size which I think was said in the Results. More risk but more return IF we can win the business .... - Our main competitor is a private company called trustvesta.com. Whether there is any interest in a tie-up between the two is open to discussion. Our Chairman has a history of deal-making so will have a few different plans I'm sure. - The China mi-pay links are either a genuine mistake or a blatant ramp. More likely the latter I suspect. Basically I wish I was still invested in ACZ, but we are where we are. If we can win new contracts and retain the ones we have then the share price is clearly too cheap with such strong margins. But if we lose contracts then .... Des | deswalker | |
24/5/2017 09:33 | Thats not this mpay SteMis is another co. thats ripped their name off in china. I emailed the co about it a while back and they confirmed they were aware of it but don't have the email anymore. If anyone wants to verify they respond to emails pretty quick. | bad gateway | |
24/5/2017 09:26 | Nothing is wrong it's all ifs and buts if we can hold contracts or gain traction in the Far East, it's going to be a slow burner imv. | battlebus2 | |
24/5/2017 09:10 | Mc of just over 5m, expected to break/profit next update, what's wrong?? | mustau | |
19/5/2017 14:19 | The 'ramp' seems to be based on hxxps://xiaomininja. "Xiaomi Unveils Mi-Pay To Compete With Apple Pay" although the article is dated August 18, 2016 | stemis |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions