Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Lms Capital Plc LSE:LMS London Ordinary Share GB00B12MHD28 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.10 -0.31% 32.20 30.80 33.60 0.00 0.00 - 11,970 16:35:07
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial 0.0 -4.5 -5.5 - 26

Lms Capital Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1126 to 1149 of 1450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  46  45  44  43  42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
07/9/2016
20:39
There's no mystery about rathair's allocation. HL clients received a basic allocation of 6.9% of their holding plus 6.51% of any excess they tendered. So anyone who tendered 100% received 6.9% of their holding plus 6.51% of the remaining 93.1% which is 6.06% of their holding. So in total they received 6.9% + 6.06% = 12.96 of the amount tendered. rathair tendered 20,000 of his 40,000 holding. So his basic allocation was 6.9% of 40,000 = 2760. His excess was 20,000 - 2760 = 17,240 and his excess allocation was therefore 6.51% of 17,240 = 1122. So his total allocation was 2760 + 1122 = 3882 which is 19.41% of the amount tendered. As for Barclays, they are always last.
number33
07/9/2016
18:54
Filtered. Lol!!! They don't like it up 'em, Cap'n Mainwaring.
eeza
07/9/2016
18:31
Yes I realise that a day after I had submitted my application so just let it go.
rathair
07/9/2016
18:21
Rathair - I don't understand why you didn't Tender for the full 40k, as so many of us posted, that was the right way to play this Tender. Result for you would have been 12.96% of 40k, ie 5184 redeemed at 84p, rather more than the 3882 you actually got!
skyship
07/9/2016
18:18
Thanks Tilts. That may explain the difference. Mine is a SIPP holding.
786sunshine
07/9/2016
18:12
Still nothing with iWeb. Grrr. Anyone else with them?Will report my % when it's in...
le4r
07/9/2016
17:59
Mine were not held in my ISA acc if that helps.
rathair
07/9/2016
17:58
Well maybe I made a mistake or they will correct it later if they do I will let you know.
rathair
07/9/2016
17:56
The difference could possibly explained between ISA and non-ISA holdings. The brokers would normally have different pooled designations for each account.
tiltonboy
07/9/2016
17:39
Very strange rathair. I am with HL and tendered all my shares. Like 786sunshineI had 12.96% accepted in the tender. Incidentally is anyone else with Barclays ? My partner tendered her shares with them and had heard nothing. She called this afternoon and was told it could take up to four days for their corporate actions team to let her know the outcome ! She told them that many other brokers had already sorted this out but they didn't seem at all concerned that their service was lagging in comparison to rivals.
cousin jack
07/9/2016
17:37
I too received 12.96 at HL....2 separate holdings.
langland
07/9/2016
17:20
That seems quite strange rthair! Not sure if there is a 'guideline' which UK brokers are expected to follow, setting out precisely how the allocations should be made when different shareholders (within that broker) tender different percentages of their holdings.
786sunshine
07/9/2016
17:10
I dont think so as the figures would still not stack up but in the opposite direction.
rathair
07/9/2016
17:04
Thanks rthair. I had tendered my full holding of 5256 and was allocated 681. It may be that the 3882 allocation represents around 12.96% of your total holding.
786sunshine
07/9/2016
16:57
All I can do is give you the info I have.
rathair
07/9/2016
16:48
I had tendered my full holding at HL so it does seem strange that there is a significant difference in the allocations. Not complaining, just curious to know possible reason(s) for this significant difference within the same broker.
786sunshine
07/9/2016
16:30
I received 12.96% from HL.
786sunshine
07/9/2016
15:15
I have no idea about that but the exact figure is 19.4%. But I made a rickets of my application, but not that fussed.
rathair
07/9/2016
15:12
Is that a function of HL being so large and having a greater chance of PI's not paying attention to the tender? Jealous... :/ I only didn't use them because of their trading charges.
simonsaid1
07/9/2016
15:03
Sorry lol.
rathair
07/9/2016
15:00
Filtered !!!
eeza
07/9/2016
14:53
You wont like this. 19% HL.
rathair
07/9/2016
13:34
Corporal Jones has filled me 12.83%.
eeza
07/9/2016
13:17
Ref my post 1114 regarding a 6.9% fill on Spreadbet. Received another 5.3% today. Explanation was that they were paid in 2 separate clips. One yesterday & one today.
eeza
Chat Pages: Latest  46  45  44  43  42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
LMS
Lms Capita..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200712 14:12:40