Kibo Energy Share Discussion Threads

[uknighted] 10/7/2019 17:21

Best ignore him Yaki, he is just someone who has reappeared under a different avatar.

[yaki] 10/7/2019 17:09

WB, a lot of confidence for a novice, is this your second week on ADVFN?

Woolybadger62 10 Jul '19 - 15:26 - 1742 of 1743
0 0 0
Sells now in the 0.7s soon to be 0.6s then 0.5

[woolybadger62] 10/7/2019 15:27

This video makes me laugh every time https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/stocktube/12248/kibo-energy-not-dependent-on-one-project---coetzee-12248.html

[woolybadger62] 10/7/2019 15:26

Sells now in the 0.7s soon to be 0.6s then 0.5

[lurker5] 10/7/2019 11:06

You can't deter a clappy. He survives on self-delusion and ignoring hard fact. You can see it, live, on LSE

[woolybadger62] 10/7/2019 10:14

Crazy people are buyingAll based on nothing This share has delivered nothing but misery, rage, fights, money lost for all holders. It's best to just take what you can and leave quietly

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 09:35

I don't know why don't you ask them about their power plant project as far as it is seen that also hasn't come to anything with or without a SML but you now accept that there is a very big difference between a ML and a SML and that one is a bankable and the other is not. You can not have a power plant without a guarantee of supply. If a ML is only good for 10 years and the plant is for 25 years do you really think they will find any one willing to go ahead with it with a 15 year short fall on the supply for the plant? Easy answer.

[yaki] 10/7/2019 09:26

Chimp (SHIFT 1)
"...it very clear the SML has not been approval"

"... No SML. No MCPP ..." - So why EDl applied for their CtP to be approved, the RCPP, given they have no SML or haven't thought to apply for one?
Quick, go and tell them where they wrong!




AIMChimp 10 Jul '19 - 09:10 - 1736 of 1736
0 1 0
YAKI it very clear the SML has not been approval and that a SML is needed for the MCPP. A standard ML is not bankable for the life of the plant and so isn’t going to be enough. They need a SML. They have not been issued a SML. You can dress it up as you like but simple facts. No SML. No MCPP

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 09:10

YAKI it very clear the SML has not been approval and that a SML is needed for the MCPP. A standard ML is not bankable for the life of the plant and so isn't going to be enough. They need a SML. They have not been issued a SML. You can dress it up as you like but simple facts. No SML. No MCPP.

[uknighted] 10/7/2019 08:55

AIMChimp10 Jul '19 - 08:36 - 1731 of 1732
0 1 0
No YAKI you are just trying to muddy the waters as you do not want people to see the truth. I am not two people and I am not paid as much as you want to belittle my commentary.

And there we have it in Chumps own words that he IS paid to post!

Top of the morning to you.

[yaki] 10/7/2019 08:45

Chimp

I am getting tired correcting you. Honestly my friend, spend some time finessing your spinning techniques

"...but a SML is which has been refused" - WRONG.
SML has been recommended for issuance by the Mining COmmission, the only body which is tasked to review such application. Following delays in its signing off by the Cabinet, Kibo and the Mining Comm has decided to pivot.
Kibo wouldn't have done it, if it didn't make sense for them. I am sure of that

And main reason to have an SML is that they come with MDAs, but not anymore. MLs are renewed after the original 10 year period, if resource not depleted. As confirmed by the Mining COmm in another application.

Oh well, I will leave you for now, as off for a nice b'fast. But please behave, as given your posts with poor English and blatant wrongs, you might lose your job.


AIMChimp 10 Jul '19 - 08:36 - 1731 of 1731
0 0 0
No YAKI you are just trying to muddy the waters as you do not want people to see the truth. I am not two people and I am not paid as much as you want to belittle my commentary.

The resource under a ML is not the same as the resource under a SML because a ML is NOT GUARANTEED FOR LIFE OF THE POWER PLANT but a SML is which has been refused. This is why they need a SML for a power plant and not a ML or even 7 of them as it needs to be BANKABLE and guarantee supply for life of plant. But you already know this so why try misleading?

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 08:36

No YAKI you are just trying to muddy the waters as you do not want people to see the truth. I am not two people and I am not paid as much as you want to belittle my commentary.The resource under a ML is not the same as the resource under a SML because a ML is NOT GUARANTEED FOR LIFE OF THE POWER PLANT but a SML is which has been refused. This is why they need a SML for a power plant and not a ML or even 7 of them as it needs to be BANKABLE and guarantee supply for life of plant. But you already know this so why try misleading?

[yaki] 10/7/2019 08:19

Chimp

WHich one is it
"...Having coal supply from other resource not indicated in the BFS..."

or
"... I see the ML applied are on the SML plots"

Or is this Chimp Shift 2
So confusing,
Can the two of you sort it out and come up with a unified position.



AIMChimp 10 Jul '19 - 08:04 - 1729 of 1729
0 1 0
Are you trying to be thick YAKI? I see that SONIC is suggesting you are selling down your positions here which would tie with your recent ramping but that would not be possible surely? I see the ML applied are on the SML plots that is not the point the point is a SML is BANKABLE FOR THE TERM OF THE PLANT and a standard ML is not. The plant needs a BANKABLE MINE RESOURCE as otherwise they will not find willing partner to move forward with this without guranteeed supply - but you already know this so why are you trying to mislead otherwise?

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 08:04

Are you trying to be thick YAKI? I see that SONIC is suggesting you are selling down your positions here which would tie with your recent ramping but that would not be possible surely? I see the ML applied are on the SML plots that is not the point the point is a SML is BANKABLE FOR THE TERM OF THE PLANT and a standard ML is not. The plant needs a BANKABLE MINE RESOURCE as otherwise they will not find willing partner to move forward with this without guranteeed supply - but you already know this so why are you trying to mislead otherwise?

[yaki] 10/7/2019 07:56

Chimp,
you are making me to laugh

"...Having coal supply from other resource not indicated in the BFS isn’t a bankable resource."

IT IS THE SAME RESOURCE, HAVE A LOOK AT THE MAP.

It is just a different regime, Both Tancoal and EDL applied for the power element with MLs rather than SML!

ML are extended while the resource is not depleted! And they have quite a few other coal PLs (if you know what that means), so I am sure there is no shortage of coal!


AIMChimp10 Jul '19 - 07:50 - 1726 of 1727
0 0 0
Oh dear oh dear UKN you really should spend more time doing your own research and not listening blindly to others saying it all ok.

BFS was prepared on basis of SML with 25 year resource in place for the plant. How is the BFS still relevant if the SML has been denied? Having coal supply from other resource not indicated in the BFS isn’t a bankable resource. Look it up because it will explain why people are selling.

[yaki] 10/7/2019 07:53

Chimp
Are you shift 1 or shift 2 chimp?


Reading your post, I would say that you are shift 1, judging by the poor English -
"...they have to guanrantees supply..."
"... bankable resource for government to be approval...

shift 2 Chimp has much better English

AIMChimp10 Jul '19 - 06:44 - 1724 of 1725
0 0 0
UKN / DEECAY how will they fund the 7 mining licences or any work done on these plots? How can they progress the MCPP with no SML and no bankable coal resource? You would know that they have to guanrantees supply to the plant so they would need a bankable resource for government to be approval of course you know this? So who is naive or very stupid as only one of us is invested here. How will they be paying to keep the lights on when they can not raise at sub par value? Your living in fantasy land.

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 07:50

Oh dear oh dear UKN you really should spend more time doing your own research and not listening blindly to others saying it all ok.BFS was prepared on basis of SML with 25 year resource in place for the plant. How is the BFS still relevant if the SML has been denied? Having coal supply from other resource not indicated in the BFS isn't a bankable resource. Look it up because it will explain why people are selling.

[uknighted] 10/7/2019 07:17

Chump if you refer to the bankable feasibility study, this has already been completed.
Edit, who is stupid? While you are earning your peanuts scratching away I am touring Ireland. Off round the Ring of Kerry today. Enjoy your scratch!!

[aimchimp] 10/7/2019 06:44

UKN / DEECAY how will they fund the 7 mining licences or any work done on these plots? How can they progress the MCPP with no SML and no bankable coal resource? You would know that they have to guanrantees supply to the plant so they would need a bankable resource for government to be approval of course you know this? So who is naive or very stupid as only one of us is invested here. How will they be paying to keep the lights on when they can not raise at sub par value? Your living in fantasy land.

[uknighted] 09/7/2019 18:10

Very naive or very stupid? Look in the mirror Chimp and all will be revealed!