We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Just Group Plc | LSE:JUST | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BCRX1J15 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.20 | 0.19% | 106.40 | 106.20 | 106.60 | 107.00 | 105.80 | 105.80 | 94,817 | 10:08:41 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Life Insurance | 2.24B | 129M | 0.1242 | 8.57 | 1.11B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
15/10/2018 09:46 | Consistent rise in medium term gilt yields and therefore liability discount rate and attractiveness of annuity yields | 18bt | |
15/10/2018 09:38 | SP broken to the upside of small flag.Bullish | bolador | |
09/10/2018 17:20 | Kames upped holding by another 0.5% | scrapheap | |
05/10/2018 15:55 | Lansdowne trying their hardest to short this.idiots ! | the canadian mounted | |
05/10/2018 07:39 | Possibly shorts closing. | trewinney | |
04/10/2018 15:59 | 3% of the share capital traded today.... decent volume that. | scrapheap | |
04/10/2018 13:16 | Back to a pound 👍🏽 | the canadian mounted | |
04/10/2018 09:43 | Well done lansdowne (not)! | the canadian mounted | |
04/10/2018 07:46 | Big risk shorting these Fingers burnt time! | the canadian mounted | |
04/10/2018 07:19 | Lansdown Partners with a big increase in their disclosed short position....increase of 0.36% or around 3.3m shares Still the only published shorter >0.5% | nav_mike | |
03/10/2018 15:32 | Interesting rns today | the canadian mounted | |
03/10/2018 11:29 | Wtf is going on with the share price ???? | the canadian mounted | |
03/10/2018 08:16 | Our reply to the Institute. They should have read CP 13/18 before replying to it. | eumaeus | |
01/10/2018 17:44 | The PRA didn't cause it it was the markets reaction to changes yet to be released in capital requirements. I don't know this sector well but I have been involved in the analogous banking recapitalisation saga. I'd have thought CoCos would be a good solution here. Are they being considered? | loglorry1 | |
01/10/2018 17:34 | Yes, but when you cause -50% on the share price of a participant company, that is hardly what one would call GOOD REGULATION! | topvest | |
01/10/2018 17:22 | The PRA are not daft. They've acted pretty sensibly with the recapitalisation of the banks. I think they'll be sensible here too. I don't think they'll be massive shocks to the system and they'll give firms time to build additional capital. | loglorry1 | |
01/10/2018 16:30 | Interesting - seems to be a polite two fingers up to the PRA. The PPA are wrecking the market: you can change the rules prospectively, but the threat of pushing massive changes through straight away undermines the capital markets. They have handled this in an incompetent manner in my view, but they don’t care as they are civil servants and they can do what they like. | topvest | |
01/10/2018 12:39 | 606 - thanks for this, just looking now. | eumaeus | |
01/10/2018 10:45 | eurmaeus - Be interesting to hear what your response to institute of actuaries submission to the PRA | horndean eagle | |
01/10/2018 09:57 | 604 "I have made this point twice already but I'm still not confident you get it." I think we will have to agree I don't get it, and leave it there. | eumaeus | |
01/10/2018 09:09 | eumaeus 596 and 598 "593 Not hedging the underlying. The contract to be hedged is to deliver a property to you in n years time. That contract is a form of derivative. I hedge it by buying the underlying." You are hedging it by being a property owner, landlord, responsible for the condition of the property and its maintenance etc. which is a point I made frequently ages ago. You are agreeing with me but you don't realise it. 598 - Yes I'm familiar with graphsofrelativity. In order for the Black 1976 model for NNEG to be applicable to property, the contract you are selling me would be discounted in line with a deferment rate based on notional rental income. I.e. I could buy the apartment freehold from you forward 10 years at a discount to today's price of say 23% So I'd give you £730k, and you'd owe me a Mayfair apartment in 10 years time in the condition a current £1m mayfair apartment is in now. However you switched the goalposts by then saying I'd have to pay £1m (current price) for a 10 year deferral. As I also said previously, you'd still be out of pocket, but far more so if you sold me the deferment contract priced on the same basis as NNEG's are under Black 1976. I.e. the options model doesn't price property correctly because property is not like other income earning assets (for reasons also listed previously). "So, a standard 99 year lease on our Mayfair property, assuming vacant possession value £1m, would have a market price of about £950k, with the freehold at around £50k...But using the HPI method, we would get negative leasehold value, with freehold priced at over £1m." "we would get negative leasehold value" - why? since HPI doesn't preclude a valuation of net yield? Straw man Re: 597 - I have made this point twice already but I'm still not confident you get it. Life co's who have historically said they will value NNEG using options can't just change now because they don't like the numbers output using futures prices rather than HPI projections. However I don't think they should be valuing NNEG using this method at all for reasons stated (ad nauseum). Under NNEG I can buy an apartment (freehold+leasehold) off you for deferred possession 10 years at a fraction of today's price. You don't seem keen to sell me one at discounted at a deferment rate, but you are prepared to sell me one non-discounted even though you would also lose money. Just not quite as much. | dasv | |
01/10/2018 06:35 | That's not his "notice" that is what they have agreed will be his departure date, subtle difference no? Didn't quite read as a "go away" (you know, no quote from FD and "to pursue other ventures type stuff") but never great to see an FD leave, despite that the odds say they have to at some point!! Let's see how the markets react. Does it make them "easier" to sell as per that article someone posted? | qs99 | |
01/10/2018 06:25 | CFO stepping down with a months notice is 'interesting' timing.... | scrapheap | |
28/9/2018 15:12 | Just Group 2026 9% bond now priced at 115.018%, running yield 7.82% excluding cost of entry. 13.4% off the 133% high, compared with equity 49% off. Appreciate the two are not directly comparable. | exmooroil |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions