Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jupiter US Smaller Companies LSE:JUS London Ordinary Share GB0003463402 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +1.25p +0.15% 853.50p 850.50p 853.50p 852.00p 840.00p 847.00p 49,581 16:35:15
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Equity Investment Instruments 1.3 -0.6 -3.9 - 181.54

Jupiter US Smaller Share Discussion Threads

Showing 89701 to 89716 of 90025 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  3589  3588  3587  3586  3585  3584  3583  3582  3581  3580  3579  3578  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
28/5/2010
16:08
What a laugh this thread is but to be honest I do not really understand it. You see - I only pop in periodically to read the last few posts. Could someone here tell me what the hell is going on?
loverat
27/5/2010
21:52
MikePStevens Common! you know he's not.
tundeolajide
27/5/2010
21:41
ABarclayman I beg your pardon re: CJ site. Is that a slip or what?
tundeolajide
27/5/2010
17:44
ab...yeah you got it in one...he's one of mh's buddies...say no more
mikepstevens
27/5/2010
12:48
I've just been on just think action but can't see what dudishes is on about, mind you there are at times some spam forums which arent there on my next visit so must get deleted. Maybe dudishes is the one posting the forums, trying to get CJ's site closed down, hence his post!
abarclayman
27/5/2010
01:03
No luck with your sharepicking, so gotta make a buck somewhere eh, porn and viagra? http://www.just-think-action.co.uk/ Despite his faults, don't think ACE would have allowed such denegration. What a shower you are, Chris Jones & Co.
dudishes
26/5/2010
14:34
looks like it.
gartshore
25/5/2010
17:57
Can we all now say this is THE END.
golde
25/5/2010
17:18
what no Kidd & Hardy show anymore .
gartshore
27/4/2010
20:17
Mike Thought i remind you that some got ex-gratia payment, travelling expenses, employed for helping JAG. Whilst other provided their services for free. Over and out before the thread weekend/after hour visitor clock me online.
tundeolajide
23/4/2010
11:19
TundeOljide I don't doubt they'd give their honest opinion. It doesn't mean they're right nor does it answer my question. If it was so obviously flawed, why didn't the solicitors (can't remember their name) Mr Hardy supposedly went to (when he was under the spotlight about dodgy deals with Mr Lawley and cash payments to him) do anything? AB
abarclayman
23/4/2010
07:37
Exactly Tunde. To best of my understanding there's loads of still very angry folks who believe they were stung back in 2002. However, I suspect the fact that the average invested in that flawed fund raising was in the £hundreds, and investors have long written off their investment as not worth arguing about after so long. They might have a point. EDIT.....and on the point of shareholders being shafted & misled with that flawed fundraising......am pretty sure solicitors Messrs Carter Ruck were of a similar view.
tippyex
22/4/2010
21:37
The interchange of poster worth mentioning. Seems Mike is having a break. ABarclayman re: "I've not ever seen any proof of the so called 'flawed fund raising'" ASK ALL THE CVA CONTRIBUTORS THAT LOST MONEY? YOU WILL GET AN HONEST ANSWERS
tundeolajide
22/4/2010
13:02
If I knew then what I know now then I'd certainly have never donated a single penny to the fund raising. I was clearly misled, as per examples I've given time & again on here. I'm pretty sure if shareholders knew then what they know now (& should have been told at the time) they would never have invested in that flawed prospectus. Who specifically assessed the "in excess of £30 million" claim as "actually identified by solicitors"? I appreciate you claim not to be a shareholder - but if you don't believe me about bona fide shareholders feeling shafted & misled - just read back to some posters on here like Sansofe, Infamous Academy, mekapun, joshro, totters, adie, moneybelt, wooden5, PeakK9, wonderlust, RHM, Ianmar, golde, rally, TundeOlajide, Katsuman, peteh1, trout, supreme, snaffleclamp, romanrory and many others I've forgotten through the mist of time. Contrary to your convenient belief I'm no massive fan of Hardy's (you'd have to look long & hard to see such support from me) - but at least he has provided hard evidence that we were misled and JAG was one rotten apple of an organisation. You keep on banging on about Hardy and what he received from Lawley. I honestly don't know the answer to that. FWIW - I have been lead to believe for some considerable time now that Hardy's view on Lawley is similar to mine on Jones. But of course, you'd only see that as yet another convenient smoke screen, eh?
tippyex
22/4/2010
12:37
TippyEx I've not ever seen any proof of the so called 'flawed fund raising'. Plenty of companies fail over time, just look at Mark Hardy's very long list of liquidated and struck off companies posted by Gartshore a while ago! Which didn't make poor Gartshore popular as you well know! If you were honest, you'd admit you only hung onto Mark Hardy's coat tails after you were originally against him but then he learnt what you were after and he saw how to capitalise on that. But where has it got you both? AB P.S Since seen your new edit.
abarclayman
22/4/2010
10:51
What it's always come down to is shareholders were misled & shafted out of their money by investing and/or donating to those flawed fundraising exercises. End of. EDIT.....anyway, I've always said that if there's any evidence of Hardy (or anyone else for that matter) doing anything illegal........then prosecute. Absolutely no skin off my nose.
tippyex
Chat Pages: Latest  3589  3588  3587  3586  3585  3584  3583  3582  3581  3580  3579  3578  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:40 V: D:20171217 17:47:27