ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

JUS Jupiter Us Smaller Companies Plc

1,335.00
0.00 (0.00%)
18 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jupiter Us Smaller Companies Plc LSE:JUS London Ordinary Share GB0003463402 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 1,335.00 1,330.00 1,340.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Jupiter Us Smaller Compa... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 89851 to 89862 of 90050 messages
Chat Pages: 3602  3601  3600  3599  3598  3597  3596  3595  3594  3593  3592  3591  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
01/9/2010
12:22
Fair comment Dudishes.

Snaffleclamp et al - did you ever get answers to your reasonable shareholder related questions on here from the very guy who claims to represent shareholders?

No?!
Thought not.

tippyex
01/9/2010
11:11
....loads of childish remarks from the resident schoolboy as usual...sadly nout changes...yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn

ed....well almost nout changes....mustnt forget his best mate did a runner with the cash he got from lawley/indigo....the writing was on the wall as cj always said....no wOnder mh's trainee muppet (who's now fully qualified :) is always having tantrums & throwing out his toys...just like the dynamic duo used to when cj was onto them....as all the courts accepted from the damning evidence

mikepstevens
28/8/2010
02:40
Strange that they remove from Hardy's thread, not from this one, maybe Chris Jones has no bother with it? As for the website, haven't checked it lately, but do recall it being closed once I alerted the founders that it was full of porn. Poor management all round I'd say, management with a very small "m"

yet another for the weekend:-

gicikbebe7 - 27 Aug'10 - 22:39 - 23682 of 23682


Gordon Kidd is a convicted child molester as well as mark hardy. Do not give them any of your personal information. they will both stalk and harass your kidds.

Kidd and hardy are also thieves who stolen the company cash and assets. Do not send them any money. You have been warned.

dudishes
23/8/2010
08:57
Dudishes

Do you mean friend.......or associate?
No doubts you can still catch him as a prolific poster on CJ's corrupt website run for & on behalf of shareholders (lol). Without the filth & the libellous fiction mind you.

So.....last week I was accused of being a child molester, a thief, defamation, harassment........ whilst I was apparently in a state of worry over prosecution.

wOnder what this week will bring, eh?

Pathetic. Truly pathetic.

And still not one simple straightforward shareholder related question of mine answered with a full and honest explanation.

For & on behalf of Great Ormond Street Hospital For Sick Children.

tippyex
22/8/2010
09:54
You must have had few in your lifetime. So once again what is your problem?
tundeolajide
21/8/2010
20:08
So what? What is your problem then?
tundeolajide
21/8/2010
14:24
Gartshore

You making me laugh re: harassment. Enuff said

tundeolajide
21/8/2010
14:21
ABarclayman

I think you're stretching the truth re: ......... Mr Hardy who he now knows took you shareholders for a ride.

So far: Hardy cost shareholders nothing v CVA cost shareholders £

May be Mr Hardy took those in the know for a ride but not the majority of CVA contributors

Dog eats dog mesays What goes round comes round

The rescue was a scam as no fat chance of the company being rescued. There will never be enough working capital to keep it afloat and the assets rescued worth not much.

Why the resuce attempt? Because someone people thinks they can milk the IP assets whilst under their control and get shareholders to provide more funds to

People can post whatever they want, the silent majority knows the truth

No need ganging on Billy

tundeolajide
21/8/2010
10:50
don`t forget his blatent harassment of poor me although it did backfire on him when i served him with court papers rotflmao he is so thick at times doh.
gartshore
21/8/2010
09:59
The defensive posts of Tippyex and deluded reply about not being involved in the harassment of Mr Jones when we all saw the evidence confirms plainly that this character was involved. He is very delusional and bitter having been in bed so to speak with Mr Hardy who he now knows took you shareholders for a ride. The pointless flapping around of someone in deep water who's obviously not a swimmer. Must get to the shops for some groceries, have a nice weekend (unlike Mr Hardy and his oppo, i mean it!)

AB

abarclayman
21/8/2010
03:07
gicikbebe6 - 20 Aug'10 - 15:25 - 23673 of 23673

One of your friends Chris?


Gordon Kidd is a convicted child molester as well as mark hardy. Do not give them any of your personal information. they will both stalk and harass your kidds.

Kidd and hardy are also thieves who stolen the company cash and assets. Do not send them any money. You have been warned.

dudishes
20/8/2010
09:06
.........meant to add.....if what you say about the court hearings & inevitable outcome is true (which it isn't imho) then how comes the Judge(s) allowed any appeal(s)? Usually if any case brought before the court is clear cut then no Judge would grant any appeal. And if the outcome would have been the same as if a group of shareholders (and not Hardy) had tried to prosecute then how comes CJ felt he needed to employ an army of legal expertise to defend himself? And how comes he wasn't granted any costs or expenses or compo? Or was he?

........... from what little selective facts from a distance I could judge..... it seemed to me MUCH was being made of the fact that Hardy had no legal standing and was harassing/victimising/persecuting CJ whilst Hardy apparently was on a crusade against CJ to help create a smokescreen for Hardy's own alleged devious activities elsewhere.

Now - surely - none of that would apply if a group of shareholders had/were to present the case?

For & on behalf of Great Ormond Street Hospital For Sick Children.

tippyex
Chat Pages: 3602  3601  3600  3599  3598  3597  3596  3595  3594  3593  3592  3591  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock