We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jupiter Us Smaller Companies Plc | LSE:JUS | London | Ordinary Share | GB0003463402 | ORD 25P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1,335.00 | 1,330.00 | 1,340.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
17/8/2010 08:35 | MikePStevens I don't care what's on CJ's corrupt website. I haven't got a clue what's been posted there for several years. But I have been told by several people that there have been several 100s of posts on there transparently making direct reference to me being this or that, being guilty of doing this or that, been involved in this and that, lied about this and that.........constan CONTRAST THAT - my posts on here, are mainly asking CJ straightforward shareholder related questions (that never get answered) and my highlighting his shortcomings and inconsistancies and anomalies......all based on known facts and evidence. I have never hidden behind any nick. You and Ali Onder (who is always welcome in your home) CJ and his wee gang have always known who I am. CJ has even put many of my posts on here in the courtroom as evidence.....ffs!!!! .....and, what you posted above is done with your usual memory lapse, I even gave you my real name & identity in email exchanges with you back in 2003. Unlike you. In hiding even then. And ever since. | tippyex | |
16/8/2010 18:58 | ....as for your real name being used as a pseudonym on cj' s website you said on here yonks ago you didnt care about what was on there....now youre whinging...typical.. | mikepstevens | |
15/8/2010 13:01 | MikePStevens The website still doesn't have a front page (www.just-think-acti ca UPDATE: I see someone has taken note of my post and the site is now fully back up. | classaction | |
13/8/2010 11:16 | Tippyex You need to stop the endless mischievous speculation about me old boy, just because i question you, your opinions and your relationship with Mr Hardy, past or present. Also i've not posted any defamatory comments, unlike you, so jettyboy's post isn't relevant to me. But obviously is to you, which is why you have to comment! You're much too easy to see through old boy. AB | abarclayman | |
13/8/2010 08:55 | jettyboy - as MikePStevens/ABarcla As ADVFN and the Police will tell you - it is possible to use fabricated IP addresses which makes tracing a bit of a mare. Mind you - if you don't have that skill set......then yes, it is as you say "interesting". | tippyex | |
12/8/2010 22:36 | posted on the Corac (cra) BB interesting! rat attack - 9 Aug'10 - 08:57 - 10397 of 10535 Interesting and about time (no doubt more will follow): Nighthawk Energy plc ("Nighthawk" or "the Company") Bulletin Board Legal Action The board of directors of Nighthawk, the US focused hydrocarbon production and development company, is pleased to advise of action that has been taken and is continuing in response to persistent defamatory and untrue postings on the Interactive Investor Trading Limited ("iii") and ADVFN plc ("ADVFN") bulletin boards. The postings concern the operations of Nighthawk and its management which the board considers to be extremely damaging to the Company and its reputation. The Company took steps to identify the posters who try to escape liability for their defamatory postings by hiding behind a cloak of anonymity, using anonymous email, social networking or bulletin board accounts to disseminate those postings. In some cases the names and other details used to register these accounts are fictitious and posters also can try and cover their tracks using numerous pseudonyms but they can be traced through their IP addresses. The operators of the bulletin board services can be prevented by confidentiality and data protection laws from disclosing the names and other personal information associated with the accounts. However, the English Courts can exercise their discretion and order such disclosure, provided certain criteria are met. In the High Court of Justice on 28 June 2010 Nighthawk obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order instructing iii and ADVFN to provide information in respect of various posters, who were posting material that the Court accepted could be defamatory. Both iii and ADVFN are assisting the Company with providing the relevant information including details of the posters. The identities of various individuals behind these postings have now been established and the Company and its directors are now considering with their legal advisers instituting civil proceedings against them for defamation. Further announcements will be made as appropriate! | jettyboy | |
12/8/2010 11:34 | No - please don't confuse opinions & comments with honesty. Especially when I've always made it clear that I'm open to any plausible explanations about any shareholder related matter in this saga. Even if any evidence justifies any prosecution against the likes of Hardy (or anyone else for that matter). I am not & never have been in "any mess". And, there have never been any actions I have had to defend. Desperately or otherwise. This fantasy stuff of yours really has to stop. It's like a clinical disease you have. The only problem I've ever had in this saga is accepting all the conspiracy and fictional stories to try to cover up for why shareholders were misled and shafted from a great height out of sooooooo much money. | tippyex | |
12/8/2010 11:17 | More guess work and speculation. methinks that's been a big problem all along and got you into such a mess trying desperately to defend your actions. AB | abarclayman | |
12/8/2010 10:05 | LOL. I've always answered questions posed to me on here. Always. I answered the question about the report loads of times on here. The one that Hardy promised (not me) would form as an attachment to all shareholders for a proposed AGM & agenda. For many & obvious reasons that never materialised but as far as I'm concerned all the appropriate facts and evidence and accounting was well and truly laid to bare and put out into the public domain for all to see and judge. Which, frankly, was originally my sole intention to find out what had gone wrong and what had happened to all the money that was raised. As to your last question - I'm not 100% sure - but am prepared to make an educated guess that Hardy was trying to get the Police involved in all the cowardly criminal activity against sooooo many shareholders and get Ali Onder's contact details via Michael O'Neil. The other questions you raise I can only make wild guesses at - which would be rather pointless. | tippyex | |
12/8/2010 09:50 | Wiganer you touched a nerve. Interesting developments, Tippyex is very anxious to justify his persistent persecution of Mr Jones and prior support of Mr Hardy which we've all witnessed. Having been most intrigued by the saga and characters and followed from the sidelines, i've got some questions (which methinks won't ever get a truthful answer!) Whatever happened to the report 'billy connolley' promised within 3 months max years ago? Why on earth was Mr Lawley and or his company making payments direct to Mr Hardy? If KPMG or the Think bankers stole money as alleged by Mr Hardy, as the police didnt buy it, why didnt Mr Hardy take them to court for theft? Why would Mr Hardy travel all the way to Scotland to harass Gartshore and make threats when Gartshore was asking some awkward questions to the double act? AB | abarclayman | |
12/8/2010 09:24 | ....and...... MikePStevens......re Now why would anyone want those? Someone still posting on CJ's corrupt site under my real name? No? What about pretending to be my daughter then? | tippyex | |
12/8/2010 08:49 | I've posted loads. Even asked one only the other day about the Receiver and the Liquidator. It's answers that have been in short supply for around 20000 posts. Maybe I need to go to the CJ 'action' site for and on behalf of shareholders? Although, if CJ is prepared to come onto ADVFN under cover and knowingly lie and deceive (for which there is crystal clear factual evidence) then what chance my getting honest answers to repeat my straightforward shareholder related questions on a corrupt website he operates & fully controls? | tippyex | |
11/8/2010 21:42 | "straightforward shareholder related questions" hasn't been one of those for around 20000 posts | wiganer | |
11/8/2010 18:06 | .....the web we weave in order to deceive. Vivid imagination to create fantasy stories essential..... as well as blind eye to answering simple, straightforward shareholder related questions posted on these threads. G'd night. | tippyex | |
11/8/2010 17:54 | LOL @ MikePStevens. I haven't had zillions of nicks on here. Celtic to Billy Connolly you know all about. And Billy Connolly nick is still active but on auto link on a static computer that is zillions of miles away. Erol Bulnut is still active but was raised on a laptop that had a mug of coffee spilled over it. Guess this nick could be re-activated again if I really wanted to. And then there is TippyEx. For ease of re-registration on a replacement laptop with ADVFN only. All transparent. All declared on these threads when nicks changed. All known to be made by me. Contrast that. Last time I was 'on' CJ's corrupt website decent shareholders like ianmar & wonderlust were having their posts defaced. Has this changed? And other posters/shareholders were telling me by email that when they logged on they were having viruses attack their computer. Is that still happening? | tippyex | |
11/8/2010 17:05 | c.a.....all pages i clicked on work...try refreshing your page use f5 | mikepstevens | |
11/8/2010 16:57 | MikePStevens, There have been porn links but I see they have been deleted. I'm not sure why it's relevant though. As for "the rest of the site is working ok... shame eh :)" perhaps it says something about the types of sites you visit when you think that a page that simply says "We are currently updating the site which will be available again as soon as possible" is "working ok" ;). I have no axe to grind with you though (or anyone else actually).. I simply want the website back up and running as there was occasionally some interesting stuff. ca | classaction |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions