ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

JSP Jessops

0.38
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Jessops LSE:JSP London Ordinary Share GB00B035CB69 ORD 2.5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.38 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Jessops Share Discussion Threads

Showing 8601 to 8625 of 8800 messages
Chat Pages: 352  351  350  349  348  347  346  345  344  343  342  341  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
22/10/2009
12:11
Ah, thanks, sportbilly, I remember now: pbracken, the 'one-way bet to 0.1p' man.
tr65
22/10/2009
11:30
he also stated that he was able to hold to the end, so I imagine he has his stop set (he was on a cfd) at a very safe level - say 3p+.

if his position is a December contract then JSP will have delisted before its expiry and he will be able to purchase stock on the grey market to close his position.

sportbilly1976
22/10/2009
11:06
I would imagine he still has his.
Only because he implied he was holding the position to the end.
And I don't think he's the only one.

fishman
22/10/2009
11:00
tr65 - it is a poster on here...pbracken
sportbilly1976
22/10/2009
10:59
Who is 'our friend'?
tr65
22/10/2009
10:39
no idea...but if he has DMA there has been well over 1 mln traded on the buy side via AT trades in the last few days, so potentially.
sportbilly1976
22/10/2009
10:36
So has our friend closed his million?
fishman
22/10/2009
10:34
fishman,

the reason behind my assumption/guess of 2% is that professional shorters would have been onto JSP when it was trading in the teens or above, or maybe when it spiked up to 8p earlier this year...and they will have closed.

some may well have gone short recently and are waiting for their 0.1p, but the recent share price movement (or lack of) may well have got them to close and take the 0.3-0.5p gains from the 1.5p at which I will assume they went short.

Also, if you look at the trades which have been going through plus over the last week or two...they are virtually all buys and so the volume traded there (>10 mln in that period) to me suggests that most shorts are now out.

of course I may well be completely wrong, but those were my assumptions...

sportbilly1976
22/10/2009
10:34
Anyone can see that your buy price today is 25% higher than you could have got yesterday. That's quite a hike for anyone hanging about needing to buy.
fishman
22/10/2009
10:28
Sportingbilly1976:
I see we have still not anywhere, apart from assuming 'the mad' have been buying JSP shares!
I don't know myself, but how come you have decided that there are less than 2% currently short?
Remember, not only were there professional shorters holding from a long while ago, but a lot of people got involved recently.
These latter are into this as a sure thing, so are holding until the 0.1p.
I can't believe if you add that lot up it is under 2,000,000 shares!
I mean, our friend here has a million doesn't he?
I wonder if that early spike on the chart is making anyone nervous?

fishman
22/10/2009
09:08
sbs,

professional traders will not be touching this. The mkt cap / liquidity is too small & the spread is too large for them to trade (currently 12%).

to make £1k on a turn would require a purchase & sale of >2 million shares which can be executed right on the spread.

As a neutral, it is interesting to note that there will be only a set amount of shorts around.......maybe at most 2% left (you cannot open new positions) and once these close who will be buying?

whereas there will be 90%+ who still hold stock and can currently sell for 11x what they will receive once this delists....

sportbilly1976
21/10/2009
21:49
Yes - but which way ;-)
sbs
21/10/2009
19:01
Maybe we're lining up for a big stop-busting spike tomorrow?
tr65
21/10/2009
17:09
Perhaps it's all those high frequency program traders which account for 99% of liquidity in normal stocks. Who needs an actual company?

Not dissimilar from paper (fiat) currency. No underlying asset, but still people trade trillions a day!

sbs
21/10/2009
16:29
Even though I'm losing money, this gets funnier every day.
tr65
21/10/2009
15:49
level 2 looking its strongest now in some time...

1.363mln v 800k - 1x 100k order at 1.3p, otherwise only Mm's on the sell side

sportbilly1976
21/10/2009
10:51
the trades yesterday seem to have lightened the buy side of the order book...

just 175k to 1st MM at 0.75p, with only another 65k on the book apart from the MM's...

941k v 1,242k

sportbilly1976
20/10/2009
16:37
quite a bit of the support that was there at just over 1p taken out this pm with over 800k in AT trades....

could be interesting tomorrow if a few sells start to come in..

sportbilly1976
20/10/2009
15:58
high volume this pm compared to recent days....
sportbilly1976
20/10/2009
08:46
it was a few years ago agreed, and it was mainly ofex, but 500k for a prospectus is not true unless you are talking 100m company plus
1howie
20/10/2009
08:16
6.5% on early trading. back on the way to 1.3p and then I'm outta here.Maybe ;-)
discoverytim
19/10/2009
15:38
1howie - you must have worked in corporate finance a long time ago if you believe a prospectus costs £50k. I was given indicative pricings of around £500k for a small rights issue circular (not even a prospectus) when the European Prospective Directive came into force - and from several supposedly independent sources. Needless to say, we didn't pursue this "opportunity"!

Of course, it is possible that value for money has improved recently ;-)

sbs
19/10/2009
15:29
If only Victor Kiam hadn't popped his clogs.
tr65
19/10/2009
15:28
i worked in corporate finace and we floated many companies so these figures are correct. The only asset that hasnt been valued here is the tax losses which normally sell for around 10p in the pound. Not sure how much they have in losses, but I'd guess it is substantial
1howie
19/10/2009
15:18
sbs,

on the LSE website -listing cost of £30k and then £5k a yr....someone posted earlier that fees would be 3-5% of amount raised & prospectus around £50k.

so raising £1mln (mkt cap here now) costs a total of about £135-150k.

offset that against spending £1.1mln+ for a £100k payment...so a loss of £900k+

sportbilly1976
Chat Pages: 352  351  350  349  348  347  346  345  344  343  342  341  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock