Itm Power Share Discussion Threads

[vlad the impaler] 02/12/2022 06:54

You know, if you dealt in the same thing, you would be up a stack since 700p, and not throwing it away on a buy now 😀

[vlad the impaler] 02/12/2022 06:53

Not sure why my presence is considered different to any other

I simply present the facts. If those were a buy, I’d say that

I’m not interested in lies post after post :)

[vlad the impaler] 02/12/2022 06:27

Thanks Norbus. But being called a knut is pretty much the same recognition anyway haha

[grahamwales] 02/12/2022 04:48

Toyota gets £11.3m to build hydrogen-powered pick-up truck in Derbyshire

[norbus] 02/12/2022 02:39

Genius! You are clearly underrated and deserve recognition : OBE at the very least for services to the London Stock Exchange. a Seer , a Prophet.. Elon!!

[vlad the impaler] 02/12/2022 00:11

Going to 20p dude

hard to believe but I’m sure 63p was when 700p

Market has a way of making any price seem right and normal when at it

The trick is to see it before it goes there 😂

[norbus] 01/12/2022 23:52

63p Vlad ? No you lunatic. 630p nearer the mark.

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:35

Well we call it a bounce but come on, seriously?

It’s adjustments in consolidation

In their view anyway

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:28

Got to give them credit. Smart dudes. More patient than any buy side desk

Right now I think they allowed this bounce, to adjust

Let’s see

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:25

The buy side analysis at low matches up to all this re who is actually driving it up

Simply allowed to, would be the answer

Sector really

As they adjust shorts to make new balances reap much larger %, than a further drop only being say, an extra 5% return from much higher holding prices

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:22

You know. 0.1 official to get 0.4 out etc

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:21

So I try work out what they feel covers them to such an event , and keep a strong calc on off radar situation

I’d be concerned if record official shorting was causing a short squeeze on the under radar levels

But it ain’t

It’s not false official confidence marker whilst trying to stealth bail in a panic

😂

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:18

Moontheloon1 Dec '22 - 23:15 - 25272 of 25274
0 0 0
Your strategy is based on nothing occurring to support the sp

……

I consider their risk. Their position. And what is covering them if such news did occur

Why exposed to such a risk?

Or is it a risk?

Do they know it’s not a risk?

What’s cost to them if wrong

Etc…..

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:16

Yeah happens now and again. Not often

I only get caught if they do

Keeps bad odds minimal

[moontheloon] 01/12/2022 23:15

Your strategy is based on nothing occurring to support the sp

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:15

Main thing was, that unknown 4% wasn’t buying

I don’t lay much attention to public info such as short tracker etc etc
Such things just there to present to the public, what they want to present

[moontheloon] 01/12/2022 23:15

Real positive progress news or contract news would make you close out , as reverse momentum would be too strong

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:12

I don’t mind a bounce against a short position, as long as it’s just traders or at least, nothing from the unknown

😂

It won’t last too long and can short more

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:08

More important to try track the unknown. You need to see a short squeeze or ‘ending of short programme’ there . Often way too late, any other way

Same goes for buying of course

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:05

I reckon approx 4% is shorted and not accounted for . Thats with a 0.4 MfE either way

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:04

When you have tried a few things for a few years and one method ends up consistent with hindsight, u know u are there or thereabouts

[vlad the impaler] 01/12/2022 23:03

You have to learn to look at loan market, free float blah blah, and try work okt what could be under radar. It is possible to work out what is possibly on loan from the balance of outstanding but it’s a bit more difficult dnd theoretical there