IS Solutions Share Discussion Threads

[santangello] 07/6/2016 07:55

Very encouraging news, a nice starter before the main meal due imminently.

150p seems very conservative in the short term dlku.......

[tech] 07/6/2016 07:43

Interesting news today

[dlku] 06/6/2016 08:58

next screamer leg north here?

[dlku] 05/6/2016 18:58

Results getting nicely closer

[dlku] 24/5/2016 15:07

cool thanks. Moving northwards

[santangello] 23/5/2016 20:33

Last week in June dlku.

[dlku] 23/5/2016 08:51

When are results guys

[standish11] 10/5/2016 12:49

Per the trading update in Feb 2016...

The Board is confident that the business will deliver a strong performance for the year ending 31 March 2016 with both revenue ahead and profitability significantly ahead of current market expectations. Trading for the 2016/17 financial year is also expected to be significantly ahead of current market expectations.

We look forward to updating shareholders as we progress through the year and at the time of the Annual results which will be announced in June 2016.

[albanyvillas] 10/5/2016 11:27

profits ahead of expectations news time

[tech] 10/5/2016 11:21

Few buyers in today, when are result expected.

[arronparkinson] 27/4/2016 10:45

There is a Trades section on ADVFN that gives you the trading volume of any company on a daily basis. You can go back and check previous days to find out previous volumes.

[petersinthemarket] 27/4/2016 10:20

Seems from comments that the day's trading info is not as easy to state as i thought.

But I wrongly quoted a figure i found on the ''trades'' histogram for 25th April on the London Stock Exchange web site. I should have said ''value'' was £27m gbp, and not number of shares. apologies for that. If you have an interest pls check the various LSE data for yourself.

I didn't really intend to get into all this but it does raise an issue on how we judge the real number of trades (trade = sell plus buy) especially when more than one exchange is dealing. Perhaps someone can throw some light on it.

As I am sure was obvious, i was initially only trying to make the point that imo it would be most unlikely that any of the bb contributors around us could have the slightest effect on the market, and i firmly believe this to be true.

I am still at the preliminary stage of looking into this company and not actually a holder yet so I will leave you guys with it for now. bst rgds, pete

[from8to800] 27/4/2016 08:09

My platform shows only 59,000
what the hell?

[arronparkinson] 27/4/2016 07:43

Approx. 109,000 shares were traded yesterday on ISL.

[dave2608] 26/4/2016 22:55

petersinthemarket

Thanks for your reply. You say 28 million shares were traded yesterday. There's only 37 million shares in issue. That would mean that 75.68% of the share issue was traded, which seems a ridiculous figure. Can you tell me please where you've obtained this 28 million figure from.

[petersinthemarket] 26/4/2016 20:19

dave - you seem to have taken offence! - abs no offence was intended.
Light hearted banter.
Yesterday if i read the lists right around 28 million shares were traded.
Pretty high fire power for eleven of our contributors - wouldn't you agree.
I am still abs certain that no bb poster here could (or may) influence the share price
Take it easy buddy.

[dlku] 26/4/2016 14:50

Tough titty, Dave. Deal with it.

[dave2608] 26/4/2016 11:51

petersinthemarket

MAY,I will repeat may have triggered. Your implication is that I said 'will have triggered'.

After 3 buys and 11 sells yesterday, the share price had moved down 11p from the mid-price. That's just 11 people selling petersinthemarket. If that's all it takes, 11 sellers, then yes a bb poster can influence the market, albeit in the short term. If they weren't able to influence the market IN THE SHORT TERM (emphasised so you don't misquote me) they would cease to exist.

[dlku] 26/4/2016 10:34

dave

chin up soft lad


90p support on chart


Naked update today will confirm sale and could get more selling

[b1ggles] 26/4/2016 10:31

Not a lot of material difference between the two, but I doubt anyone's reading them anyway. You get these tw*ts on BBs all the time with bizarre agendas, life's to short to take any notice.

TBH, that applies to 80% of the other posts, too!

[dave2608] 26/4/2016 10:17

This is how his post 266 now reads in case he goes into anymore editing.


its lost momentum and is a sell imho

Helium Rising Stars Fund still got 2.5m share which they may dump


my target on chart : 90p

see 90p support on chart


if you have £12500 invested and it gets to 90p, then its a £3500 loss

[dave2608] 26/4/2016 10:09

This is how his post 266 read last night. Note how he's added the imho, amongst other additions in.



its lost momentum and is a sell.

Helium Rising Stars Fund still got 2.5m share which they may dump


my target on chart : 90p

[dave2608] 26/4/2016 09:55

diku has edited his post 266 dramatically since last night. This shouldn't be allowed. Editing up to 5, maybe 10 minutes later I think is acceptable but not hours later. In fact there's no time limit to the editing of posts.

I hope no one on here has been taken in by this guy and was soft enough to sell yesterday. Enough taken in by him may have even triggered the panic and sizeable share price fall. Also watch out for the editing of his posts hours after the event (He might edit post 266 again as the story changes to cover his back). This is diabolical behaviour. ADVN needs to do something about this, quick.