ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

IOF Iofina Plc

21.00
-3.00 (-12.50%)
Last Updated: 09:09:11
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Iofina Plc LSE:IOF London Ordinary Share GB00B2QL5C79 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -3.00 -12.50% 21.00 20.00 22.00 22.50 21.00 22.50 511,233 09:09:11
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Offices-holdng Companies,nec 42.2M 7.87M 0.0410 5.12 40.29M
Iofina Plc is listed in the Offices-holdng Companies sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IOF. The last closing price for Iofina was 24p. Over the last year, Iofina shares have traded in a share price range of 19.50p to 37.50p.

Iofina currently has 191,858,408 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Iofina is £40.29 million. Iofina has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.12.

Iofina Share Discussion Threads

Showing 74576 to 74597 of 74600 messages
Chat Pages: 2984  2983  2982  2981  2980  2979  2978  2977  2976  2975  2974  2973  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
16/4/2024
09:19
Another lack luster update that will no doubt result in further lack luster share price action, along with the lack of new investors or current investors buying in my opinion.

I really feel the management needs to change. Lance needs to go and Tom needs to be moved to the side and some fresh energetic blood needs bringing in.

jwoolley
16/4/2024
09:12
Now more buys than sells - and still off 12%. don't understand that. !
beercapafn
16/4/2024
08:43
Obscene spread. 3p, 15%.
beercapafn
16/4/2024
08:42
On the price SQM(the price setters) have said the price will remain at these levels all year.

With Cosayach losing 2500t pa production in coming months and SQM plant opening, to effectively replace this production down the road, delayed in the courts it feels as if there is more upside to iodine price than downside right now.

chillpill
16/4/2024
08:26
That’s a very good and fair point on the royalties vs. brine supply Severn.

If agreements are due for renewal, they need to pay market rate, not really any avoiding that and securing the brine is most important. My frustration was more that it’s a forecastable event, so I would have thought Canacord would have had it in their estimates given they are guided (or so I thought) by the company.

Anyway, these must be the brine agreements that were on a fixed $ royalty (of some sort, per unit I would guess). Hopefully now they are on a percentage of revenue type agreement, I would hate a fixed $ per unit royalty at these iodine price levels, just in case they were to come crashing down again at some point.

naphar
16/4/2024
08:16
I don't see the increased royalty rate being too bad a trade off for continued brine supply to existing plants. The cost of relocating those plants would be considerably higher especially when downtime is included. In addition if the oil price drops those wells supplying brine are less likely to be shut in provided they are producing oil at a reasonable rate.

Longer term I don't see the iodine price falling substantially given constrained supply and environmental concerns in Chile. That should mean the existing plants will continue to generate profits whilst the longer term plans for new plant rollout will provide greater production of iodine for each well sited successor plant. I suspect that our long term price per kilo production cost will drop even with increased brine royalties if the new plants produce as expected.

I would like to see some longer term plans for owning a high ppm brine supply well that we can operate ourselves.

I see the iodine sales expansion as a positive as this will hopefully absorb the increased iodine production as more plants are constructed.

severnof9
16/4/2024
08:11
I’m not sure where they get quite a lot of their figures from tbh. I preferred the finnCap research. Was easier to understand.
chillpill
16/4/2024
08:09
Yes there does seem to be upside chill.
I don’t know where the $300k ebitda per $1 increase comes from. I would have thought it would all drop to the bottom line, except perhaps for some additional royalty cost of about 10-15% (unless I am being fact), so with expected iodine sales of 634mt, I would think ebitda could be understated by $2.7m if prices remain stable and they sell per expectations.

naphar
16/4/2024
08:04
yesterdays traders out already...LOL
barrywhit
16/4/2024
08:04
well someone is disappointed. !
beercapafn
16/4/2024
07:49
Frustrating on the brines. Canaccord have scaled back the figures in accordance with the guidance.

As they say those figures are based on $60 iodine price when the current price is $65. They estimate you can add $300k in EBITDA for every $1 move so that figure should prove conservative.

Good that IO#10 is another 100-150t plant. Hopefully IO#11 will be operational by this time next year.

chillpill
16/4/2024
07:47
I think that explains the lack of director buys this year, they will have been in a closed period, if nothing else. I suspect they will now remain in a closed period until post results announcement.
naphar
16/4/2024
07:42
So on the operational side all seems to be going to plan, IO10 on track, volumes on track, IO11 negotiations at advanced stage (but heard that before on previous plants), iodine price holding.
Just the small elephant in the room of a profit warning for 2024 due to updated brine supply agreements, causing a target price reduction from 40p to 35p.
What baffles me is why Canacord hadn’t been factoring in to forecasts such a change to brine supply agreements. Surely they would have known? I certainly don’t think this would have been a surprise to Iofina. Maybe they didn’t want to tip off brine partners to the topic but I also expect they would have been well aware anyway.

naphar
16/4/2024
07:19
"once operating, IO#10 is expected to produce 100-150MT of crystalline iodine per annum."
That is very approximately around a 20% increase in revenue.

this_is_me
15/4/2024
19:33
The only thing that looks to be “up” is that the seller has finished. The shares traded of 983k is similar to other days recently.

We know there will almost certainly be a production update this week and also the data available to us- temperature, well volumes and iodine price suggests a very solid quarter.

chillpill
15/4/2024
14:21
The 13 - 123 - 1230 buyer is having a real push this afternoon if you follow the moment-to-moment real-time share buys. Go - go - it is working.
beercapafn
15/4/2024
13:53
Looks like somethings " up "
beercapafn
15/4/2024
11:39
Large buy at 23p @ 10.11....225k
barrywhit
15/4/2024
10:07
Fingers crossed the seller of the last few weeks is done.
chillpill
14/4/2024
19:57
Hi Chillpill

Re post 8732. Thank you for sharing. It is much appreciated.

severnof9
14/4/2024
19:37
Wes tomorrow given Fridays end of day uptick? Or was it just the shorters closing thinking they pushed their much far enough?
naphar
14/4/2024
08:11
Spot iodine price has rallied to where it was 6 months ago. Gone up 6% in last 6 weeks.

Severn- I was looking at the SWD volumes on the OCC website where I can see 4 of plant water volumes. IOF have good exposure to some of the highest volume wells- post restrictions. So being around existing SWD’s is limited.

The highest volume wells are around 18k bpd including Rio Grande. Longhurst (IO#2) is around 14k per day.

IO#9 is completely different in that is in an enclosed system so isn’t affected by SWD injection rates. It has a 25k capacity. The plans are on the OCC website too. It is in a new drill area to ensure max plant life.

chillpill
Chat Pages: 2984  2983  2982  2981  2980  2979  2978  2977  2976  2975  2974  2973  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock