We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iofina Plc | LSE:IOF | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B2QL5C79 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 22.00 | 21.00 | 23.00 | 22.05 | 22.00 | 22.00 | 308 | 08:00:01 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offices-holdng Companies,nec | 42.2M | 7.87M | 0.0410 | 5.37 | 42.21M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/3/2024 09:36 | PS. Thanks Serratia - appreciated. | starastar | |
28/3/2024 09:33 | I think we have to assume they will move to a maiden dividend. That seemed to be the mood music at the last AGM. | starastar | |
28/3/2024 07:53 | Thanks 2 Serratia, great to hear from you. And a great post. | bocker01 | |
27/3/2024 22:37 | Nice to read you Serratia, thanks for the update | naphar | |
27/3/2024 21:55 | Thank you Serratia👍 | j4ckster | |
27/3/2024 20:42 | As of now, 7 anonymous posters some of whom may be shareholders seem to line up behind Beer’s whinging post begging for a buy back (I am not one of the former but, regrettably, am one of the latter). At times like this, I regret not leaving my phone unused under charge. | bocker01 | |
26/3/2024 09:43 | If the BOD are plotting some M&A activity, they have seriously underestimated the market reaction to the lack of updated news and information being offered to shareholders. The lack of information is being interpreted by the market as negative. 47% down from the 37p. Just what IS necessary to spend some of the surplus balance sheet $ on a buyback? | beercapafn | |
26/3/2024 08:10 | Chilean press reporting that Cosayach are in trouble yet again. One plant (Cala Cala) has been operating without correct permit's for several decades. They were warned to move it in 2022 however still in breach. The press article yesterday says SMA are currently considering appropriate sanctions. The one thing in Cosayach’s favour is potential job losses in the Pozo Almonte area. Their other larger production plant down the road is expected to close in coming months. 2 plants being closed would be a disaster for the local community. | chillpill | |
25/3/2024 21:11 | Serratia was a great contributor and much missed. | bocker01 | |
23/3/2024 14:26 | Bocker01: Remarkably similar because I am trying to influence the BOD and other investors that there is an open path to running the company in an improved manner. | beercapafn | |
22/3/2024 23:19 | So people have been throwing their toys out of their prams that we didn’t get a Feb trading update like we did last year. I went back to last years Feb 6th RNS and it said… “ FY 2022 EBITDA expected to exceed market expectations” They have always said they update the market if there is a significant deviation to forecasts (over 10% iirc). So last year we had the trading update. The lack of one this year simply tells me we are within range of market expectations so no Feb announcement like we had last year. While it’s frustrating not to have results yet, they have been getting earlier year by year recently…. FY22 25 April FY21 9 May FY20 25 May FY19 27 May So by end of April we should have them and hopefully by mid April if they can improve by a couple of weeks again. And yes Beer, I agree the sliding share price since last years peak is incredibly frustrating, I just see it as totally de-linked to the progress the company is making, albeit far far slower than we would all like. | naphar | |
22/3/2024 20:52 | Beer, I’ve got to hand it to you for persistence though I cannot help but feel that your posts are all unremarkably similar. Have a good weekend matey. | bocker01 | |
22/3/2024 16:26 | Naphar: With the share price crashing, I think it is unlikely that the opinion of the BOD is " decided an intermediate announcement wasn’t necessary " | beercapafn | |
22/3/2024 12:18 | Indeed Chill, even if there is some M&A activity going on in the background, we really should have had something on 2023 financials by now… maybe they are going to give audited results soon and decided an intermediate announcement wasn’t necessary | naphar | |
22/3/2024 07:55 | Naph I think is on the right lines. Q1 has probably not been too shabby at a production level. My biggest annoyance is they haven’t given greater clarity on Y/E 2023 financials. Yes we know Annual Results are subject to audit but within 6 weeks of the year end you have a very good idea of where you stand. Also there are no projections in market into 2025 so Canaccord need to step up as well. | chillpill | |
22/3/2024 06:49 | Naphar: Share price dropped from 37p to 22p. No news. No BOD share buys, suggests a self-imposed blackout period. No use of buy-back funds. Failed to pass resolution at last AGM regarding funding for M&A. Past experience..... | beercapafn | |
22/3/2024 06:28 | There are hardly any trades today Says it all | rambo1122 | |
21/3/2024 18:09 | Beer - there are hardly any trades today… what are you finding so unsettling that prompts the concerns (almost allegations) you posted? | naphar | |
21/3/2024 17:56 | Nellyb" Nope, the BOD have promised transparency and open dialogue with shareholders. That is not what is happening here. Again, you comment on "my" comments. Please focus on the dynamics of the situation. I do not appreciate your focus on my dynamics or intent. | beercapafn | |
21/3/2024 17:01 | Nelly, why should it be deleted? The BOD are inept at best and some members are not to be trusted, SIMPLE! | pinkpudycat | |
21/3/2024 16:50 | beer - that is quite a libellous statement, that you may wish to delete. | nellyb | |
21/3/2024 15:47 | If you follow the share trades, this is very unsettling. Many times in the last 3-4 years the BOD has promised to treat shareholders in an open and transparent dialogue with shareholders. This is not happening now. We are well over the normal reporting times. If I find that Lance has YET AGAIN - treated IOF as his thiefdom. I am going to be very upset at the BOD. | beercapafn | |
21/3/2024 13:38 | Naphar: I recon you are right. At the last AGM, they wanted to pass a regulation to raise funds to enable M&A. It was defeated. It was my thought a a duplicitous action to set aside of 1 million was for M&A, not Buybacks. | beercapafn |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions