ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

IES Invinity Energy Systems Plc

23.75
0.00 (0.00%)
17 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Invinity Energy Systems Investors - IES

Invinity Energy Systems Investors - IES

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Invinity Energy Systems Plc IES London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 23.75 08:00:26
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
23.75 23.45 23.75 23.75 23.75
more quote information »
Industry Sector
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 17/4/2024 20:54 by megaman2
Might as well throw warren buffets name in the hat to then plus bill gates and the sultan of Brunei as the other stimulated investors ..😂 they are going to want a piece of the action surely if musk is in .
Posted at 17/4/2024 19:29 by megaman2
I disagree an investor is an entity that invests . Which can include a company and is the most likely inferred party here that's why the rns title has the word strategic investor in it...it's much more likely to be a company than someone with some dough...very slim chance

Institutional and private investors are both investors for example ...the rns did not say private investor did it ..so why would you get to that conclusion when it's clearly about strategic investors and basic common sense says it will be a company that bring something to the party . It doesn't explicitly rule out an individual but it's a very long shot given the context . What do you think the binding agreements for ...???!!!
Posted at 17/4/2024 18:27 by mikemine1
Whoever or whatever these strategic partners are they will be bringing more than just cash to the table IMHO. The RNS is a bit annoying as it talks about investors and then strategic partners. IES also talks about investment from across various jurisdictions. Not sure what that means other than investments/partnerships from here and/or abroad. I wouldn't have thought a straight cash investment would need considering across other jurisdictions. I like puzzles but I'd want more knowledge and information before guessing who/what they are talking to. Could be an individual like Radcliffe or something like Blackrock. We could spend the next few weeks guessing and still be wrong. It's fun though.
Posted at 17/4/2024 17:29 by indiestu
A tier one investor is an individual as opposed to a tier one company. The RNS could of course have been badly worded but it seems the big investment may come from a tier one investor who will materially raise the profile of the company. Throwing it out there could it be Musk?
Posted at 16/4/2024 09:48 by mab
Is this the Tier 1 investor that Invinity is refering to? Google doesnt throw up any other definition.

"The Tier 1 Investor visa category is for high net worth individuals who are willing and able to make a substantial financial investment in the UK. Investor visa holders are permitted to work, study and engage in business activities. They can also be accompanied or joined by their dependants."
Posted at 15/4/2024 14:31 by owenski
No great detail presented in this RNS, 'progress being made, still weeks away' - 'IF' - it all goes well.

But, could be good, only time will tell.

Looks like they're outsourcing to a lot of their markets with an agreement to purchase the IP - cell stacks - directly from the company, this may or may not be a completed product in its own right as they stress in the previous Everdura announcement - that it'll utilise Invinity's supply chain, if so, then it sounds more like a 'handling charge' arrangement for some components with the donkey work of building the whole thing including cap ex costings for the rest of the VRB, being expended by the in country seller.

Direct sales still retained in UK and US/Canadian markets by IES, which at this stage, there is insufficient detail on actual margins earned from an as yet to be launched Mistral product.

Not enough detail on any of the financials on any of it, including what these investors are going to stump up in return for what exactly - equity stakes? - very likely, what kind of profitability will come to Invinity for making domestic supplied stuff or what royalty fees will look like for overseas builds is all unknown.

Being as Mistral is not yet launched, I'd suggest it'll take time for any vendor to tool up to make the stuff anyway.

The RNS sounds positive but is more of the same - 'progress being made', but still weeks away from the actual details.

'Cash flow' is likely to still be some time away, the business is likely to survive but the model is changing and not enough financial detail is known for the PI to make clear informed decisions beyond a guesswork punt.

IES are always upbeat in presentations but behind the scenes they continue to run out of money and the uptake of VRB's in the manner promised to investors has yet to gain traction, there still seems to be a sales hiatus.

Still no rush to buy into this.
Posted at 03/4/2024 20:52 by hope1815
Sometimes just reading other posts in Linkin can throw some light on certain items.

Ralph Anderson-Corporate Relations Manager at Invinity Energy Systems-Investor Relations, Communications (internal and external) and Marketing professional with over 10 years of sell-side and Capital Markets experience and with a broad range of investor relationships built up over many years.

Following his Like linked posts can hint at other things
Posted at 15/3/2024 07:44 by megaman2
It's the corrupt ceos and not the shorters that's the problem ..shorters are just a symptom of ramped share prices that many daft ramping individuals help cause ..novice investors roping in other novice investors ....it's always them to first shout shorters when their beloved stock falls often with no evidence or blame the market makers for their own ignorant investment..how often have you seen numpty investors claim.shorters and market makers to blame when actually the company is simply over valued ...often..

If many of these director lifestyle companies are not shorted it will ultimately lead to investors losing more money as they will.just end up over priced and still fail...
Posted at 26/2/2024 08:16 by megaman2
Yes on lse they are misreporting what was said on the vsa podcast ...Andrew monk talks about concerns of a discounted placement all he confirms is that he hasn't been anywhere near a retail investor ..

So they jump to the daft ramping conclusion of no dilution ....

There is a guy harchris who is like Walter Mitty with a history of nonsense posts on other stocks.

I'm sure monk is not including a strategic investor in the retail investor cohort and to claim he said no dilution is just daft ramping ..

Its very hard to see how a strategic investor comes on board without dilution . It's more at what price .
Posted at 16/2/2024 03:10 by megaman2
Thanks hope .


Here is the link . Defo worth listening ..
Ies incredibly cheap ..talk of discounted placing but he hasn't been near retail investors and they are in talks with strategic investors that will be company transformational and it just takes time .

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock