ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

INTU Intu Properties Plc

1.752
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Intu Properties Plc LSE:INTU London Ordinary Share GB0006834344 ORD 50P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 1.752 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Intu Properties Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1801 to 1825 of 4200 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  84  83  82  81  80  79  78  77  76  75  74  73  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
10/9/2019
00:27
There are a few others - but of the blackstones of the world only Brookfield has an appetite for retail (and level of experience too) SPG might be able to fund it corporately - or rather probably would be able to - but would they put their cherished and rare A credit rating at risk
williamcooper104
10/9/2019
00:19
Yep - it says that - but I would still prefer HMSO with their market cap more than covered by Bicester Also what it doesn't state is the horrific spens liabilities - from memory the coupon on the Trafford debt is c6 percent - I think there's about 10 years to run They probably have modified spens clause - but even with that they would still need to pay PV of Coupon less (10 year gilt plus say 50bps) - that's easily hundreds of millions And yes of course any purchaser could of course keep the bonds outstanding but they then have the massive opportunity cost is not investing in a clean asset at current super low debt costs - and they'll see that opportunity cost on their cash on cash returns No question Trafford is a great centre and a huge land holding with lots of potential - but equally I well remember looking at it in 2010 - and in the midst of recession it was far from immune
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:55
I think that is academic. There is only one certainty which is only Brookfield can pull this off. No one else has the expertise or dept of capital to turn this around.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:52
It doesn't matter if it refers to equity or equity + debt financing. If you are lobbing billions off the asking price it is going to alter the chances of getting funding.
wigwammer
09/9/2019
23:51
I'm too bullish on topshop It needs boat loads of capex - and don't think that will be forthcoming
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:50
The failure rate for CVAs is high - so doubt that both Debs and Arcadia will make it through Debs business model is simply gone There ought to be life, or rather the capacity for life, in Topshop - but huge execution risk in turnaround - and of course a little pension deficit
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:42
What the FT article also says (yet conveniently ignored)... "Debt refinancing may yet prevent a deal for Intu as a whole. But, on a sum of the parts basis, it is starting to look a bigger bargain than anything the Trafford Centre's tenants can offer."
wigwammer
09/9/2019
23:42
Suppose they could put something in to refinance Trafford (spens liabilities really nasty though on this) and then look to discounted debt buyback Might work - v complicated - and not necessarily aligning interests with current shareholders
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:42
Arcadia might not make it, same with DEBs. If they go then it is lights out for INTU.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:40
Wig, agree with you. The question is whether Brookfield will come back and buy this. If they do then that will be the perfect outcome.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:40
FT article specifically states that they had problems arranging bank funding - not equity funding I had heard that the impending CVA of Arcadia was a big spook issue for funders - and while that's happened I still struggle to see how you could get the required level of senior debt in this market
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:35
With due respect, your point makes little sense. The Brookfield bid valued the equity at nearly £3bn. Clearly, with the current equity value at £0.5bn and the debt trading at a discount, a purchaser will not have to find anything like the same amount. This is pretty obvious stuff.
wigwammer
09/9/2019
23:32
Market debt market conditions were far better when they bid as well. With the wider fall out of Arcadia and Debs no chance now. Unless they put in 70% equity which would defeat the whole purpose of PE getting involved.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:29
I only feel sorry for poor JW. What was he thinking swapping his crown jewels for the dross in INTU's portfolio. His lifes work down the $hitter.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:27
I know, Brookfield are the only PE guys who can make this work. Orion, no chance.
zccax77
09/9/2019
23:26
If Brookfield (one of worlds largest real estate investors with better banking relationships than almost any other market participant) struggled with finance then I cannot see how another purchaser is going to fund it - in current market
williamcooper104
09/9/2019
23:15
In the words of the greatest Liam that ever lived, "Dear [...], I’m afraid there is no money. Kind regards – and good luck!"
outlawinvestor
09/9/2019
22:11
The likes of Wig may be ok sitting on 34. No pressure on position. In fact it pays on the crud stories.

I feel sorry for those that get sucked in on zero-substance weekend stories.

Really shouldn't be allowed unless it is at a developed stage in the process

sentimentrules
09/9/2019
21:55
FT poring cold water on Orion's interest this evening. Says it's "fantastical"
propinv
09/9/2019
17:19
If someone offered 500mn for this the bod would take their offer. The value here is in the debt stack. Heck I think if they waited another 6 months they could get it for free, on the proviso the second half results are as bad as the first.
zccax77
09/9/2019
16:46
on the open market it would still only cost £500m or so (yes i know that would engender a hostile takeover with a price rise of sorts) even so one would have expected to have seen some stake building going on, which so far has yet to materialise. PE has a record of getting things on the cheap; delisting; refloating (loaded with massive debt) i think hammerson must consider themselves lucky to have dodged that bullet (mind you, you could also say similar of klepierre re hmso) intu looks like an ailing old dog with fleas - you can give it a bath and some medicine, but i suspect you can't get that much more life out of it
steverabet
09/9/2019
16:42
're sellers day....distribution day

Agree?

sentimentrules
09/9/2019
16:42
Volume sell side given day . Gap market negative
sentimentrules
09/9/2019
16:40
Who fancies trying to explain the price stability vs 10 million volume ?
colonel a
09/9/2019
14:00
Look at the comments by Stifel. £4.9bn of debt is the problem, do Orion have that type of firepower? Even bigger question is whether they have the competence. They own a lousy mall in Scotland and a few assets here and there.
zccax77
Chat Pages: Latest  84  83  82  81  80  79  78  77  76  75  74  73  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock