Share Name |
Share Symbol |
Market |
Type |
Share ISIN |
Share Description |
International Business Machines Corporation |
LSE:IBM |
London |
Ordinary Share |
|
COM STK USD0.20 (CDI) |
|
Price Change |
% Change |
Share Price |
Bid Price |
Offer Price |
High Price |
Low Price |
Open Price |
Shares Traded |
Last Trade |
|
-0.30 |
-0.25% |
121.10 |
115.05 |
127.15 |
|
|
- |
3,824 |
16:35:19 |
Industry Sector |
Turnover (m) |
Profit (m) |
EPS - Basic |
PE Ratio |
Market Cap (m) |
Software & Computer Services |
104,507.0 |
21,902.0 |
0.0 |
- |
179,812 |
International Business M... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 201 to 223 of 300 messages
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|
07/1/2003 21:51 | For your information the value line report.
http://www.valueline.com/dow30/f4786.pdf |  scripophilist | |
07/1/2003 21:01 | http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/2634145.stm
IBM will continue to be hit by various charges for at least the next 3/4 quarters I would think, after that things could become interesting. |  mr euro | |
07/1/2003 20:48 | Looks quite strong at the moment, but I think $90 should continue to be a problem. I'd be tempted short again if they failed up here |  limpsfield chartist | |
07/1/2003 19:29 | Any current views on IBM from you chartists ?
Price has risen over the last few days and is now around $85-86. |  jitasb | |
06/12/2002 14:37 | Bammers getting bashed bigtime |  energyi | |
06/12/2002 07:27 | Looks excellent energyi. I'm short at the mo' |  nirvs | |
05/12/2002 23:35 | Nirvs,
I own $80 puts on this one |  energyi | |
04/12/2002 17:39 | Anyone ready to short IBM? Nice MACD divergence on the double top. Could fall down to $77. Limpsfield Chartist? |  nirvs | |
02/11/2002 19:53 | seems to me that there must be better trades around than IBM which is very much in a state of flux and actually seems to be gradually morphing into a very formidable entity. If we do see a pick up in business tech spending then I expect IBM to do very well indeed. If we see further weakness in Tech then IBM should be mor eresilient as it has been thus far.
My Opinion is that its a great long when and if the market really does turn and a very weak short... |  fse | |
01/11/2002 18:01 | Yep - too early this time round |  limpsfield chartist | |
01/11/2002 18:00 | It looks short material at $80+ but that momentum and series of gaps is a worry. Holding off for now. |  bones | |
01/11/2002 02:50 | From Raptor's Den: |  poppa wobbler | |
25/10/2002 15:23 | Yep.
Chhers Limpy. |  dil | |
25/10/2002 13:56 | Looks like a short again up here |  limpsfield chartist | |
19/9/2002 17:31 | Clobbered today - probably on the back of EDS off 40% |  limpsfield chartist | |
25/8/2002 12:34 | Starting to look interesting again. |  limpsfield chartist | |
15/8/2002 09:05 | tim 3
Still trade it a couple of times a week but I have been focussing more on US shares this year - swing trading them long and short with a 2 week - 2 month time frame. Less stressful for me than trying to jump in and out of the index all the time.
FWIW I reckon the S&P could easily run as far as the 1000 area before turning back down - two year+ trend still down for now though I think |  limpsfield chartist | |
14/8/2002 20:31 | LC
Do you still trade the S&P? miss your posts on the US thread.
Tim |  tim 3 | |
14/8/2002 20:25 | Trend's still down I reckon Dil - better stuff out there to go long of IMO e.g. WHR, TNB, SVU - loads of good longs in the S&P 500 at the moment imo...how long for I dunno...
Regards
D |  limpsfield chartist | |
14/8/2002 20:13 | Why not reverse Limpy ? |  dil | |
14/8/2002 19:08 | Covered the rest today - looking to short any strength back up towards $90 |  limpsfield chartist | |
31/7/2002 09:53 | On a different note there's rising volume as the macd trends up; will meet resistance at $73 over the next couple days. Break that and we may have a bottoming and breakout of the recent downtrend since April,, (how many times has that been said before??) |  jl202 | |
31/7/2002 09:49 | Compared to the price in 2000 looks like they picked up a bargain. Though its not all roses: I would think they might keep the PwC name for cache, but it seems along with losing all PwC's tech contracts they'll also lose the name's added value as well,, |  jl202 | |