Find Your Broker
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Indigovision LSE:IND London Ordinary Share GB0032654534 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +1.00p +0.81% 125.00p 8,434 11:35:42
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
122.00p 128.00p 125.00p 122.00p 124.00p
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Software & Computer Services 31.34 -2.08 -25.84 9.4

Indigovision (IND) Latest News

More Indigovision News
Indigovision Takeover Rumours

Indigovision (IND) Share Charts

1 Year Indigovision Chart

1 Year Indigovision Chart

1 Month Indigovision Chart

1 Month Indigovision Chart

Intraday Indigovision Chart

Intraday Indigovision Chart

Indigovision (IND) Discussions and Chat

Indigovision Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
10/1/201907:51Indigovision- IP Video & Alarm Management3,996
18/1/201522:05IndigoVision - troll-free thread9,911
13/2/201316:02Worried About Paul Scott3
29/9/201016:39IndigoVision - Now the time to take profits?116
12/7/201008:18Indigovision - wankers-only thread9

Add a New Thread

Indigovision (IND) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Indigovision trades in real-time

Indigovision (IND) Top Chat Posts

Indigovision Daily Update: Indigovision is listed in the Software & Computer Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker IND. The last closing price for Indigovision was 124p.
Indigovision has a 4 week average price of 113.50p and a 12 week average price of 113p.
The 1 year high share price is 141.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 97.50p.
There are currently 7,513,518 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 183 shares. The market capitalisation of Indigovision is £9,391,897.50.
baner: Clearly a positive trend established - strong sales however they need to squeeze some good profits out of these. Potential here is a minimum 1-200% share price increase in 2-3 years time. Low risk, as take over likely if shares do not fly from this very low level.
srsm: Another perspective. Often the bonus targets for directors are not particularly stretching. E.g. awarded at the bottom of a bear market and just after a run of bad news has hit the share price. So normal growth ends up resulting in a bonus. Happens all the time. Could it be that the management are very confident that they can meet the targets? They aren't setting targets they think they have zero chance of hitting. After all, their main rival Avigilon is worth about 100 times IND. And that with, arguably, inferior technology in most aspects. That massive growth to a $1B company achieved in about 10 years - from nothing. The new IND CEO is an ex Avigilon Senior Vice President of Global Sales - so knows them inside out. If IND hit the target they will still only be 10% the market cap of Avigilon. Not defending the full award though. Just food for thought regarding the likelihood of success.
varies: This scheme is all too similar to one devised for their own benefit a few years ago by 3 directors of Pebble Beach (formerly Vislink). Within months of getting this scheme approved VLK's fortunes took a dramatic turn for the worse. I forget the precise figures but the directors were allotted a new class of shares giving them about 20% of the company subject to the share price rising about 50% above that prevailing when the scheme was devised (say, from 67p to 100p. They now stand at under 4p ! It seems that they spent so much effort driving through this scheme that they neglected the business of the company. Given the past performance of IND a target EPS of $1.00 in 3 years time looks purely fanciful. This might justify a price of some £10 per share and, if the directors truly believe this is possible, then they should raise as individuals all the money they can and load up with shares through the market. Do they not already have plenty of share options?
cliffpeat: Who knew? From Twitter: @IndigoVisionLtd 6h6 hours ago Need a fast and efficient way of analysing license plates? Check out #IndigoVision’s new License Plate Recognition Technology which is ideal for stop and go applications, such as carpark access where cards and/or money are required to enter/exit! hTTps:// AT LAST - some professional marketing collateral. Despite the share price and update I'm suddenly feeling happier about IND DYOR
dangersimpson2: Management, Ex Management & New Pistioa own over 40% which while not technically a blocking vote comes pretty close given the percentage of shareholders who actually vote. All of these have bought shares at much higher levels so although a lot of minority shareholders would happily see an immediate premium and wish them luck as part of a larger group, I'm not sure a mutually acceptable price could be agreed with larger shareholders. If 2019 results are good and the share price is over 300p I guess a smaller premium deal would probably make a lot of sense. A lot of ifs in that scenario though.
baner: CJohn I believe you pinpoint IV´s problem - too small in too many places. The technology is excellent, the gross margins are good - but it is too costly for them to bring the products to the world wide markets. Conclusion: there will be a bid for IV at some point in time. And how could the BOD turn down a juicy premium to the share price, given the awful past of this stock? But it will not happen tomorrow - if they present solid black numbers in 2019, then we will see at least 300p on the table.
cjohn: It's precisely the fact that they have very decent gross margins, but are still loss-making, that puts me off this company… Such juicy margins attract in yet more competitors,.... The company is a multi-national tiddler and has the associated high costs of maintaining a physical presence (offices etc) in many many countries. So in spite of the juicy margins, they can't turn a profit. Very few - possibly - no clients actually need their high-end solutions. Cheaper producers turn out perfectly adequate alternatives - indeed, better products than could have been bought a few years back, given technology advances. having said all that, I did buy in the last couple of times the share price got into the low hundreds…..
dangersimpson2: Results as expected today, with H1 loss and on target for FY break even. I guess a few people were expecting something better based on the small number of sells. This should be the low point in terms of trading though. H2 will be profitable to give FY break even, and that combined with the reduced inventories & improved cash collection should see them generate FCF in H2. Still trading at a discount to net current asset value so any return to consistently profitable trading in FY19 would see a much higher share price. In the last 18 months directors, former directors, PDMR's and the company itself have bought a total of 3.1% of the equity at a weighted average of £1.77 per share. Now they are out of a close period I would expect them to keep buying at these levels if they can get the volume.
fillipe: Either way, a very welcome addition to the share register and going forward likely to have a positive influence on the IND share price. f
gengulphus: I've been tracking IV for a number of years and I remember when the founder and CEO, Oliver Vellacott, was ousted in Dec 2011, to be replaced by the CFO, Marcus Kneen. For those interested in history, here's a link: According to that article, OV was paid just under £200k a year and to quote the article direct, "Shares in the company hit a peak of around £10 in 2007, valuing it at £70m and giving Vellacott a stake worth about £17m, The company is currently worth £21m. Grossart said yesterday’s announcement was part of the process of a “small business growing up” and said it was “evolution not revolution”. If you look at a suitable chart;date2_year=2017&;ind_type1=0&ind_type2=0&ind_type3=0 you'll see that the share price reached a trough of under £2 in late 2011. I.e. the decline from that 2007 peak happened under Oliver Vellacott as CEO, not Marcus Kneen. And Oliver Vellacott basically ousted himself, essentially by attempting a management buy-out at a low price and failing to get support from fellow directors or shareholders. Doubtless not his intention, but that's the way his actions panned out, and it left him in an untenable position. (Also, if hypothetically he had succeeded and had gone on to preside over good company growth, we would only have seen that growth, not participated in it as shareholders...) Not defending Marcus Kneen's record - it's lacklustre to put it mildly (even taking the 113.5p/share dividends paid since he took over into account) - but contrasting it with Oliver Vellacott's last four years basically just shows how much worse it could have been! Gengulphus
Indigovision share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20190123 14:23:50