We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indigovision Group Plc | IND | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 391.00 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 391.00 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 21/3/2020 03:10 by glavey SRSM,20 Mar '20 - 11:23 - 4092 My point entirely. Jason, Suggest you might look: |
Posted at 11/7/2019 08:06 by balcony Well thats the news most investors were waiting for,I think well head back up to £2 now. |
Posted at 16/5/2019 15:09 by srsm Mega turnout. 5 Shareholders.Met new non-ex. Vikki Macleod. hxxps://www.indigovi Seems to have a wide variety of skills including Digital Marketing. New Head of Marketing appointed. Not sure of details yet. All seem quietly confident for a good year. I asked about Facial Recognition, the new partner has been mentioned, I'm sure. Watch the BBC Click episode at the weekend for a balanced discussion of the tech. Board pleased with the large wins in Malaysia and China Airport. I may think of more. #FeelingConfident |
Posted at 09/11/2018 11:23 by cliffpeat Latest 4 videos on IND YouTube account are for CyberVigilantAll the same but with subtitles in French, German, Portuguese and Spanish - translating the voice-over. Two - no, three disappointing things: 1. The "English" voice-over sounds pretty amateurish and garbled to me (a somewhat stilted antipodean voice perhaps?). 2. The link to the video on the website does not give option of language (which I would have thought was the whole point of making the subtitled versions). 3. And the "call to action" is merely to visit the website and "stay up to date" by subscribing to social media channels. Why not offer a download with tech spec., a conversation with an integrator specialist or something else that might connect company and prospects? I thought that with the "accountants" gone they might be replaced by marketers and sellers. Perhaps it has been decided that professional marketing collateral to support sales is not required. If so, I hope that decision has been tested in the real market place. A positive: There is loads of pretty good content on the website - it just doesn't seem to have any "vision" of the potential customer journey or ability to excite and stimulate connection with the browser. Just my "amateur" views - and as an investor considerable frustration that the potential of IND is not being exploited. Maybe IND need to be taken over if the able technical teams are to have the satisfaction of seeing the fruit of their efforts being professionally promoted, sold and widely deployed. |
Posted at 08/10/2018 08:39 by puffintickler I am against share options in principle.They give recipients massive rewards for success but there is absolutely do downside in the case of failure. They therefore encourage reckless policies, strategies and decision making and focus directors attention on their options rather than building a business. Say a (soon to be ex) mate gives you £10000 to invest for a year and, rather than pay you a flat fee of £100 he/she offers you 10% of the profits you make. Do you invest it in (1) a good investment trust or market tracker or do you (2) walk straight down to the casino and place it on red, or perhaps white. You earn case 1: 2% dividend + 3% capital growth = £500, 10% = £50 You earn case 2: 50% chance of £0 + 50% chance of £10000 = £5000 x 10% = £500 You are incentivised ten to one to go to the casino! The "mate" on the other hand would get on average: Gain case 1: 2% dividend + 3% capital growth = £500, 90% = £450 Loss case 2: 50% chance of £-10000 (£-5000) + 50% chance of of £10000 less 10% your commission (+£4500) = £-500 Compared to prudent management the mate loses (on average) loses £950 or 10% of his investment. In the case of Indigovision, the "mate" in this example is you, the hapless investor. |
Posted at 15/8/2018 13:50 by sharw Gyllenhammar is basically a value investor so it should be obvious why he has taken a stake - the MCap is just under £8m but at the last balance sheet net tangible assets were $16.6m (£13.1m) and net current assets $13.3m (£10.5m). With breakeven forecast for the current year those figures are not under threat. |
Posted at 30/11/2017 09:26 by cliffpeat dangersimpson2RNS today: SVS Church House Deep Value Investments Fund have added and now hold more than 3% of IND. Pistoia, Sorbus/Farmiloe, Grossart and Church House now hold over 50% between them - I reckon this makes it easier for potential buyers to engage informally to test the water regarding a takeover and offer price range required to achieve these key investors' objectives. Do you agree? |
Posted at 24/11/2017 09:16 by photon If EMEA is the problem area then Simoes may be the solution.Seems he did well in that region at Avigilon?http://ir.a |
Posted at 24/7/2017 14:18 by futureshock3000 Another issue with the IV Investor section of the website, again highlighting (in my opinion) the inability to communicate effectively with the investor community.If you dig around in the Reports & Announcements, you'll see this update on June 6th: hxxps://www.indigovi "IndigoVision Group plc (AIM: IND), is pleased to announce the appointment of Max Thowless-Reeves as a non-executive director, with effect from 1 June 2017. Max is a partner in Multi-family Office Sorbus Partners LLP." Yet, no mention of Max Thowless-Reeves on the Board of Directors page: hxxp://www.indigovis Are haphazard and inconsistent updates a worrying indication of what's going on behind the scenes? |
Posted at 22/7/2017 11:16 by futureshock3000 Then again, the investor relations for IV are, to be frank, woeful. AThe bare minimum updates plus the Ivestor section if the Website is out of date. Are IV breaking the law with some incorrect information? For example, under the Shareholder section, they still state that Richard Farmiloe owns 6.57%, which if you read other parts of the investor section of the website, it's clearly not the case.hxxp://www.indigovis There also appears to be no updates on upcoming events, I.e. when the half year results are published. The calendar of events states the next update is March 2017 when the annual results are released. Likewise finding out the details of the AGM were almost impossible. I don't know who in IV is ultimately responsible for the investor section of the website (CFO? CEO?), but the updates and information have gone downhill in recent months. It's worrying that a technology focused company can't do something simple like update their website. Does the unstable share value come from a lack of investor confidence, which in turn comes from poor investor relations? For example, where are the AGM presentations on IV's investor website? Why do investors have to rely on updates on forums from those that managed to get to the AGM? Again, worrying that a video technology company can't broadcast the AGM online. If the camera technology was so good, why not use IV's tech to stream the AGM? I had hoped the new chairman will change investor relations, but so far there may have been a change in chairman but there appears to be no difference in how IV communicates to its shareholders. And while there's poor communication to the investor community, I don't see how one could invest with any confidence in return on investment. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
