I3 Energy Share Discussion Threads

[kingivor] 16/10/2018 18:32

Good to have you on board short.
Just need to 'turn' Jak now.

[tsmith2] 16/10/2018 17:52

I see the looney has arrived - buy signal, if there ever was one

[tsmith2] 16/10/2018 16:26

share price here is bonkers

[fardels bear] 16/10/2018 16:00

Somebody seems to have forgotten to log out and back in again today, methinks.

[shorterofdoom] 16/10/2018 15:26

What results are you expecting? It’s only to survey the routes and existing infrastructure. No value adding information

[kierandoberman] 16/10/2018 15:06

When can we expect the results of the latest surveying ?

[duckdown] 16/10/2018 13:44

I think the BoD are as keen as shareholders to get it funded asap - they won't be sitting on their hands waiting.

[kingivor] 16/10/2018 13:36

Given the recent share price slide i would have thought the board would be very keen to communicate any positive constructive stategy.
I expect some flavour of the consultant's brief and timescales.

Is no news good news?

[duckdown] 16/10/2018 13:26

I'm not sure the appointment of an A&D advisor is RNS worthy. I suspect they will just be getting on with it now and will update the market when they have something material to report.

[kingivor] 16/10/2018 13:25

Where is the appointment of the A+D advisor?
Was imminent last week according to the vox markets interview so is a positive conclusion to talks in hand and if so would the partner require new exclusivity for a very short period.

[shorterofdoom] 16/10/2018 13:22

This is going to £5 now. Bottomed out. Majid best CEO on AIM

[roundup] 16/10/2018 13:11

K. Good point

[kierandoberman] 16/10/2018 12:29

Roundup if you accept everything management say AIM is definitely not for you .

[fardels bear] 16/10/2018 12:11

No sign of old goldensails this morning..

[uk2day] 16/10/2018 11:56

time to get your coat and take the Doberman for a walk Kieran!!!!

[ducati2345] 16/10/2018 11:54

when they say staff were not paid or took reduced wages, what exactly do they mean by staff, e.g I don't think they have many staff, isn't it mainly the directors? does any one know how many staff i3e actually have. Frankly I find it hard to believe that secretaries, accounts staff etc did not receive a salary

[roundup] 16/10/2018 11:46

Likewise Kieran, if you don't accept anything management says then, perhaps, this isn't for you.

[caters] 16/10/2018 11:44

K,

Some of the talking up ('see multiples') does not sit well and the language is, in many places, unclear.

There are some elements that sound reasonable/believable, but others like the 40p average, that sound like a fudge.

However, unless it is a lie (which I doubt), then it does seem like some of the staff worked for little pay in 2016. These may be the staff that hold shares already. Either way, long termers in the NS oil industry were willing to put their time in and forsake a salary elsewhere because of what they saw that Liberator offered.

[kierandoberman] 16/10/2018 11:37

If your satisfied with the companies email reply you shouldn't be in this game. .The sparkle has for sure come of I3e .

[roundup] 16/10/2018 11:32

We have a window of opportunity to load up. At the slightest hint of a breakthrough we will go straight up.

[coscos] 16/10/2018 11:28

Get them sorted now before company enters next black out phase. That's actually a positive.

[duckdown] 16/10/2018 11:22

This is encouraging:

"With these options, staff are aligned with shareholders (specifically those that have funded the Company) based on the performance conditions set for vesting which, when met, one could surmise would see multiples of return atop today's levels".

[caters] 16/10/2018 11:16

Well, if i3 staff have been willing to make those kinds of sacrifices, then they clearly believe in the asset.

Some staff incentivisation at this point sounds in order, though I'm still a bit puzzled by some features of the directors' options.