We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Reit Plc | LSE:HOME | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BJP5HK17 | ORD GBP0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 38.05 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Investment Trust | 11.76M | 20.93M | 0.0373 | 10.20 | 213.72M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
31/1/2016 21:31 | I hadn't thought of that Kazoom, so to sweeten the Sainsbury's deal, keep the 200m from the Homebase sale. However there would need to be a sweetener for the shareholders in there somewhere. | jonny33 | |
31/1/2016 21:24 | If it was even a possibility that we might be looking at 160 + 24 then the share price would be sitting around 160, taking into account the downside risk. | scapital | |
31/1/2016 21:21 | Not at all complicated Jonny - AFAIK the special dividend has only be suggested so far (I wouldn't even go so far as to say proposed) it is not agreed. If a bid goes through, there will be no special dividend. If the dividend was already agreed and timetabled, then Sainsbury would either be bidding for the company shares Ex-dividend at X p/share or Cum-dividend at X+24 p/share. Nothing complex at all. | kazoom | |
31/1/2016 21:20 | Considering I meant if dividend was paid out. Gives opportunity to trade stock even more for a gain | solanki2000 | |
31/1/2016 21:18 | Yes this is the issue I was considering, would could for instance maybe not give the dividend and pay 160p, after all its not even passed through to the shareholders vote etc. This is why I suggested would it be 160 + 25p. This is unclear | solanki2000 | |
31/1/2016 21:01 | I want to speculate about the future and especially the 24p per share return to shareholders. 1. Lets assume the Sainsbury's bid does not go ahead - Then I believe the share price will drop back to around £1.20, it'll hold this price until the Homebase sale is ratified by shareholders and the special div (24.6p) is paid. At which point the share price should drop by c24p to just under a pound. 2. Lets assume Sainsbury's successfully strike a deal, the share price will move to the agreed price....but now it gets complex, what happens to the share price once the special dividend is paid? I'm really looking for some guidance here as either way there is a big movement in the share price about to take place, which to a certain degree is predictable and has the potential to allow some money making opportunity if it's worked out. I'm interested to hear peoples views, especially if you have come across this type of scenario before. | jonny33 | |
31/1/2016 19:46 | I'm not sure of a bidding war happening.At £1 it was a bargain and people were sniffing around but £1.60 is another half a billion pounds. | scapital | |
31/1/2016 19:24 | 160 deal imv. | imperial3 | |
31/1/2016 18:49 | Sold out too cheaply if this is the case. Need others to get involved to bid | solanki2000 | |
31/1/2016 16:51 | Looking like 160 if this is to go ahead on a compromise basis. | imperial3 | |
31/1/2016 07:58 | Would this be 160 + 25 separate for dividend = 185. Needs to be clear | solanki2000 | |
31/1/2016 07:12 | Has to be £1.70 or above. £1.60 is a no goer | leadersoffice | |
30/1/2016 22:39 | So 160 it may well be... | haywards26 | |
30/1/2016 12:59 | Had the chance of selling at around 160, damm it. Zac Mir thinks it will go down to 120 if no bid. | katie priceless | |
30/1/2016 11:31 | Latest press article is saying talks continuing, stumbling block being price, Home want 170 yet Sainsburys offering 150. Surely they will have to settle at 160 if this is the case. I was expecting higher however...not long to wait now. Has EK made any recent comment? | haywards26 | |
29/1/2016 22:04 | They will have to be "ON Balance sheet" very soon | mornington crescent | |
29/1/2016 20:39 | Leases are liabilities only for stores that are not profitable or in a liquidation situation. I agree if you want to value the business in a liquidation then it makes sense to include them but why one would want to liquidate a profitable cash-generate business I don't know. If trading below liquidation value is your investment criteria then there are very few business that will ever be for you. For everyone else what matters is the onerous lease provisions not the gross value. | dangersimpson2 | |
29/1/2016 15:22 | The annual report terms operating leases as "debt-like liabilities". Notably they are off balance sheet. | no dice | |
29/1/2016 15:04 | clearly your understanding of non-cancellable fixed term leases is different to the norm | spob | |
29/1/2016 14:31 | Spob - clearly your understanding of debt is different to the norm, i.e. debt is unpaid money for a service rendered, not a service that has not yet been fulfilled. Otherwise we are all bankrupt due to the gas/electricity/petr | kalkanite | |
29/1/2016 13:53 | spod those lease 1/2 ish once homebase is sold! | rolo7 | |
29/1/2016 13:47 | Mathew Earl famous blogger in Twitter normally shorts has just gone long here Interesting | nw99 | |
29/1/2016 13:42 | "Unencumbered by debt" Not true i'm afraid Home has vast operating lease commitments You can't just walk away from those stores and stop paying the leases they still have to be paid | spob |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions