Highlands Natural Resour... Share Discussion Threads

[superg1] 02/7/2017 17:24

Boy you guys stoop to some lows.

I assume due to the language used you are what they used to call underclass.

Can I just remind you that by posting sucj language on a oublic site you commit criminal offences.

No matter what avatar you use itlinksback to the same ISP for any genuine IDs you have.

Also anyone wishing to take action or get your ID can do so by first odentifying an offence then applying to get details.

Perhaps Tom will but as he probably doesn't read this thread I doubt he is aware.

Some seriously sick fuitcakes about.

Don't you get it the more you post sich disgusting things the harder I will work on HNR. I have plenty more on them.

I said on LSE I'd stop posting if the insukts stopped. I haven't checked yet since Friday. I wasn't going to bother but will now.

[nobullplease] 02/7/2017 14:52

WOW! Tom,did you get totally spiked on Iofina, and because you are sociopathically,delusionally vacume sucked up into your own self important sheriffs star, you blame Paul Mendell rather than your own lack of foresight?
HNR is a speculative play, nothing dodgy, just further up the risk profile than most. DTU is looking increasingly likely to be valuable in the future, so there's nothing here to warrant the number you are pulling on them, you know it too. Relax, suck it up and move on!

[nobullplease] 02/7/2017 14:24

Superg, on the 18/10/16 you claimed to have seen information on the COGCC website that indicated DTU had failed in a well bashing test, the next day, the test results were published and demonstrated the DTU PWP test was successful. Was your 18/10 post a lie, or just a mistake?

[nobullplease] 02/7/2017 14:19

COP are planning to drill close to the HNR play, I guess they don't know what they are doing either?
hxxp://cogcc.state.co.us/documents/reg/Hearings/Schedules/Notices/2017/06/170600316_ConocoNOH.pdf
hxxp://cogcc.state.co.us/documents/reg/Hearings/Schedules/Notices/2017/06/170600317_ConocoNOH.pdf

[phoenixs] 02/7/2017 13:33

Superg1 great analytical and factual postings which I note that some are up in arms about. The closer you are to the truth the more vile they become

[nobullplease] 02/7/2017 08:51

Are you feeling OK Tom, do you need to talk to someone?
hxxp://www.wikihow.com/Spot-a-Sociopath

[superg1] 02/7/2017 08:11

BTW

That township 9N 58W where the activity seems high with good results is 36 square miles (that's what township means) and the database bringing up 202 wells for 2016 in the Niobrara.

In the entire Arapahoe county (where HNR are) it bring up 34 records which fits what I had spotted on well volumes of production.

Arapahoe is 805 squares miles with 34 well records for Horizontal Niobrara. That Noble energy township of 36 miles has 202 records.

The hotspot seems to be about 80 miles or so NE in Weld county.

[superg1] 02/7/2017 08:02

See it doesn't take long.

I did a seraph for Niobrara and it recovered 725 records for Colorado.

A quick glance down the list over the years and a township of 9N 58W pops sup as having some decent looking production.

So I clicked on some of the biggest producers.

There are about 10-15 that did over 100k barrels in a 12 month period going by years 2014 to 2016 using calendar year data on the site.

A well called Greyson seems the best at 156,582 in 2016.

So checking the data on the week I find the total depth is about 10.5k feet.

The failed wells in Arapahoe (HNR area) were 12-12.5k feet. Now On first glance I believe the difference is due to the Niobrara being deeper there by about 2000 feet. So that tells me the horizontal length of failed wells in the HNR area are about the same size as the highly active 9N 58w which alone brings up over 200 records.

14 records over 100k barrels in a year for 2014-2016.

The majority are wells about 10,500k deep. 3 or 4 are 14,500 feet deep. BUT I note those wells were the ones completed in 2014 and 2015 with the more recent higher reducing ones just 10,500 feet.

Often the used the slickwater method which is short is the high volume water method.

So back to the HNR area. Down there they did similar sized wells and they are nothing like the wells above.

In the HNR area they the tried going to large volumes of water and extra fracs in similar sized wells but still didn't get the results. So in that area they went up to 17,500 up to 52 frats and 277,000 barrels of water.

Still they don't hit the best wells rates of those 10,500 wells. With wells far bigger bigger. Those 10.5 wells are only about 4500 laterals. HNR are talking wells with near 10,000 laterals on the biggest ones.

They are surely far more expensive than those that have been drilled in the hotspot.

So my guess is the comparisons HNR use will involve many wells that are not of the optimised size they talk of.

I can only get 725 hits for 2016 using any county and Niobrara for the field. I'll have to dig deeper to work out how to get it to near 3000 wells.

Of course none of this debate matters, all that matters is the potential backers reading the same data as me decide whether or not its a viable option.

[nobullplease] 01/7/2017 19:30

You mean like this?
hxxps://youtu.be/heh-ZMyzdig

[phoenixs] 01/7/2017 18:50

IF this stock goes the way I think it will then take a good look at yourself(selves) in the mirror, because I doubt even you lot will be laughing.

[nobullplease] 01/7/2017 17:11

T W's daughter though!

[freeasabird] 01/7/2017 16:43

phoenixs = board moron

LOL LOL LOL

[phoenixs] 01/7/2017 15:17

I agree with JakNife. A stonking sell unless the company starts to produce real evidence about what they say that they have in Colorado which I suspect to be very little if anything at all.

COULD EASILY GO TO ZERO 000000000

[jackbal] 01/7/2017 13:19

Are you saying that you won't accept anything less than zero?

[jackbal] 30/6/2017 15:44

jaknife - re your short position, do you have a price in mind that you want to close the position at?

[bigboots] 30/6/2017 15:31

Busted flush, emergency right issue ??