Highlands Natural Resour... Share Discussion Threads

[kimkempster] 10/6/2016 15:35

Hi log, did you were forget you were on holiday and not going to be around? Or do you only holiday when the share price of HNR is above 60p?
Ciao

[wardy333] 10/6/2016 15:30

I don't think there is any problems, many times Oil companies hit delays could be anything, part and parcel, all the yellow bellies running for the hills , should never invest if you are on a knife edge all the time try online bingo.

[keya5000] 10/6/2016 15:29

I think you have both just bottled it and are looking for a cheaper entry price.

If we are being honest I expect that's the case.

Would you both buy again at 20p before the 'actual test results' are out.

Only a wild guess but I suspect you would and that is likely your aim.

FFS TheJaba if LL had put a post like that out you would have ripped him to shreds.

Either it makes you two gullible that you got took in then by Price & Mendell when you spent that quality time face to face to see the cut of their jib or you are now 'playing the game'.

No issue with that we are all allowed but I sense a definitive collusion between you both to start a deramp campaign.

[loglorry1] 10/6/2016 15:27

@Keya you can delete it too which is why I made it permanent.

FWIW I would say the theory that they'd tried and failed already is probably not well founded but I can see why some might think so. It's always good to be very careful and assume the worst when delays are concerned. These companies never say its dead they always say delayed.

Ps Nobody is asking me how my short is doing today ;-)

[loglorry1] 10/6/2016 15:23

Ps. The marketing job just raises massive red flags too. The guy is an engineer and has zero marketing expertise within Sclumberger. I accept maybe they need an interface to S's marketing team but again it all seems rather strange. If it works then Sclumberger and Clafrac would sell it and will have the resources to do so. If not then no amount of marketing can make it work.


If I was a cynic I might think that this was just a way to make it sound they are closer to Schlumberger than they are.

[chiva20] 10/6/2016 15:22

Argyle and Jaba my opinion of you two has nose dived. So you are all secret squirrel about discussions when bullish, then when bearish you share a load of hearsay to crush the credibility of the company. I don't think there are subliminal messages in that RNS, Schlum and Calfrac are still backing the company so presumably they believe in the story or we'd hear otherwise, certainly if a test had failed. The spurious speculation to the contrary from you two is very bad form

[loglorry1] 10/6/2016 15:21

Good post Jaba - I'll repost to add a touch of blue for obvious reasons:-

Keya

ok here you have it, not that you guys will believe it...

We were told the trials would start in JUNE and and results be made available immediately or within a couple of days. We were told that if trials don't go well they will keep trying til they get it right.

Its June 10....and they have uncovered problems with Water logistics...I mean did they not know they were testing in the middle of the desert??? did they not have 6 months to prepare for the issue of water, and mitigate it? but the water issue only comes up when trials should have been starting.

OR is water a cover for a possibly failed trial and then re-constituting the formula and trying again. purely my view.

We were told that they would test the best basin first for success and lesser ones later....ironic that they are now testing later...or is it that the first one didn't go well?

Im asking the question here, so try to think about it.

Todays RNS....we have gone from multiple potential clients to "client"

We have a exclusive with Schlumberger and Calfrac...now we are negotiating with Great Western...what happened to the exclusive??

Why didn't Schlumberger negotiate on our behalf??

Also we had an ex schlumberger as a marketing manager....What marketing...if the trials work...we don't need marketing.

Just some initial questions for you Keya. The RNS today has made someone as strong as Argyle sell, the biggest bull possible. If it can raise these questions with him, it should concern you.

Well you did ask.

[argyle underclap] 10/6/2016 15:12

jaba - good healthy points there to consider

[milliecusto] 10/6/2016 14:58

Very well documented post jaba on the other thread.

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:38

Yasx

the irony is that Argyle bought at 14 and sold north of 55....

the poetic bit is you sold at 21.

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:31

Keya

ok here you have it, not that you guys will believe it...

We were told the trials would start in JUNE and and results be made available immediately or within a couple of days. We were told that if trials don't go well they will keep trying til they get it right.

Its June 10....and they have uncovered problems with Water logistics...I mean did they not know they were testing in the middle of the desert??? did they not have 6 months to prepare for the issue of water, and mitigate it? but the water issue only comes up when trials should have been starting.

OR is water a cover for a possibly failed trial and then re-constituting the formula and trying again. purely my view.

We were told that they would test the best basin first for success and lesser ones later....ironic that they are now testing later...or is it that the first one didn't go well?

Im asking the question here, so try to think about it.

Todays RNS....we have gone from multiple potential clients to "client"

We have a exclusive with Schlumberger and Calfrac...now we are negotiating with Great Western...what happened to the exclusive??

Why didn't Schlumberger negotiate on our behalf??

Also we had an ex schlumberger as a marketing manager....What marketing...if the trials work...we don't need marketing.

Just some initial questions for you Keya. The RNS today has made someone as strong as Argyle sell, the biggest bull possible. If it can raise these questions with him, it should concern you.

Well you did ask.

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:24

the reason for his sale is that he needed to buy his good man friend (not me) dinner ...you gonna tell that the company too fission???

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:23

fission

grow up and grow a backbone. if not a backbone.,..grow a bit of a coccyx

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:22

Keya

Argyle has not started any exercise.... he is the most dignified poster here, after me.

If I told you of the reason for his sale...you would exit pronto too.

[fission453] 10/6/2016 14:22

If Argyle is honest then he'd better come up with the facts. I have notified the company as to what he said! Lets see what happens! He wants to be careful unless he is telling the truth! Lets see!

[keya5000] 10/6/2016 14:20

Take it you have sold out now TheJaba and you are promoting your friends interest.

Listen fella I did not sell any and start a deramping exercise.

Looks like you both have sold and I would suspect now want a cheaper entry.

I stick by what I said.

Those who leave the building do so with dignity. It's not harsh it's not nasty it's what I would do.

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:18

fission and everyone else

Argyle is as honest as they come, you will not find a more honest poster.

[lovegod] 10/6/2016 14:17

Its all about timing..... people should be happy with their investment...its their choice as and when... u live by the sword or not....I am very happy...I will sell one day but not today...the market knows we have something going on here..

[fission453] 10/6/2016 14:17

Argyle...where did you hear the CEO spin a lie....or are you making it up that the trials have already been conducted....you'd better have the facts or you could be in hot water!

[thejaba] 10/6/2016 14:16

Keya - would this be the same dignity that you were telling people to buy at 74p saying 100p coming...and in the background were selling ON THE SAME DAY a few weeks ago??



keya5000 10 Jun'16 - 12:42 - 6587 of 6598


Could those who are leaving the building please do so with some dignity.

[patientcapital] 10/6/2016 14:14

Holding up surprisingly well despite being overvalued. Imo.