Henderson Mrly. Share Discussion Threads

[kishka] 16/12/2010 16:47

perhaps a baseball bat might help them along......

[bi1l] 16/12/2010 10:53

Shouldnt be allowed to occur so easily, rupert. But as with buying the shares unfortunaely, we are all individuals and not a collective force. How fast they were to act in their own interests and yet how slow they always acted in shareholders interests.
Interested that CV were involved in the final stages, have come across them before.

[rupert_bear] 15/12/2010 18:48

I bought into HML on the reading of positive RNS's, (like most PIs), which were untrue or misleading so, HOW CAN THESE CREEPS GET AWAY WITH SHARP PRACTISES?
Why can't something be done about it?

[sweepie2] 14/12/2010 18:10

GGG and MLMP have been my way from the edge, up nearly 500% on each from my lowest entry points and most of the increases have come since HML robbed us.Only just in profit, hope all are well

[biffus2] 14/12/2010 17:59

guys i have made all my losses back and some more check out TSTR, Antimony is the name of the game they are due and update on drill assay results due anytime, a few of us think tomorrow morning!! hope you all ok :-)

[kishka] 12/12/2010 15:41

bob, buy some abh. lost a packet on HML made it all back on the last abh spike. we got robbed with HML

more good news imminent on abh, but dyor

[bobdown2] 10/12/2010 17:11

hi thefruits. i have cut my risk by spreading my bets. hopefully my recovery is underway. i now have five smaller investments and have done some trades and got about twelve percent of my losses back. its a good start and i will never leave my self exposed for a long period of time with my most of my money in one holding.

[thefruits] 30/11/2010 21:45

tilts
only myself to blame.
building a stake in RAM
probably one for everyone to avoid if my past failures are anything to go by
lost £100k on ETQ
and £120k on here
Still carrying forward the capital losses for the day I can make a decent profit
If RAM becomes a 10 bagger.. might just stand a chance of washing my face
gl, tf

[duplicate book] 30/11/2010 21:41

tiltonboy........that is one observation that could be aimed at many a person who frequented this particular haunt over the last three or four years!!

[tiltonboy] 30/11/2010 21:34

tf,

"another Bishopsgate / heavily pushed AIM stock goes belly up... anyway... wish I had heard this guys advice... the last sentence could have saved me losing £120k.. AK and his blimmin beard"

I think you had plenty of other opportunity over the years to cut and run!!!

[thefruits] 30/11/2010 20:33

another Bishopsgate / heavily pushed AIM stock goes belly up... anyway... wish I had heard this guys advice... the last sentence could have saved me losing £120k.. AK and his blimmin beard

7Kiwi - 29 Nov'10 - 12:51 - 13156 of 13166

From today's Alphaville :

NH but on a less positive note

Nighthawk Energy Plc (HAWK:LSE): Last: 10.25, down 3 (-22.64%), High: 11.25, Low: 9.50, Volume: 15.80m

NH bit of a blowup there
NH not good news
NH for the oilers punters
BE What's the story?
NH well
NH a new CEO has come in
NH and he has found lots of horrible things
NH taking big writedowns
NH stripping the company back to one main project
NH hang on

BE That's Jolly Ranchers, yes?

NH Future investment strategy more effectively targeted to maximise shareholder returns
Decision taken to focus on Jolly Ranch and exit all other current projects
Nighthawk, the US focused oil development and production company (AIM: HAWK and OTCQX: NHEGY), announces the results of a strategic review initiated by the Board following a number of management changes, including the appointment of Tim Heeley as Chief Executive in September 2010.
Highlights
- Nighthawk will focus on Jolly Ranch and exit all other current projects to ensure capital is targeted effectively to maximise upside for shareholder value
- This strategy, together with a number of ongoing central cost reductions, will enable Nighthawk to lower the rate of cash burn significantly and to focus on asset value delivery

NH To date, approximately US$39 million has been invested by the Company in the Revere projects in Kansas and Missouri against a revenue contribution of just US$1.5 million, net to Nighthawk; this represents a revenue return on capital of approximately 4%, significantly below an acceptable level.

NH Therefore the Board has decided to assign the Company's interests in the Revere projects to the operator, Running Foxes Petroleum Inc., with effect from 1 January 2011. Thereafter, Nighthawk will no longer have any future capital liability on the project. In return for the assignment, Nighthawk will receive a 5% over-riding royalty from production and 25% of any sale proceeds, within the next two years, if the operator sells any part of the property to a third party. Nighthawk has also retained an option to re-enter the assets at its own choosing for which Nighthawk would have to pay historic costs attributable from the reassignment date plus a 20% uplift.

NH and there's a few more like that
NH and this
NH which basically says
NH tear up all the previous forecasts

NH In the meantime Schlumberger is concluding its reservoir simulation and production modelling of the Craig and Jolly Ranch areas of the project and will shortly pass the simulation model to GCA to undertake the first Reserves and Resources study on the project. Although at this stage of development the actual reserve figure is expected to be low given the early stage of development and the relatively small area under consideration, it will be the first step in helping define a firm value for reserves and contingent resources on the Jolly Ranch project

BE This is the same company that went after the ADVFN muppets for defamatory posts a few months ago, isn't it?
NH it is
BE Oh – their website's crashed.
BE I can't get the RNS.
BE Right – got it out of Google cache....
NH excellent
NH let's have a look
NH it will make me laugh
BE Oh – can't copy. Help! Neil. Help!

NH The board of directors of Nighthawk, the US focused hydrocarbon production and development company, is pleased to advise of action that has been taken and is continuing in response to persistent defamatory and untrue postings on the Interactive Investor Trading Limited ("iii") and ADVFN plc ("ADVFN") bulletin boards. The postings concern the operations of Nighthawk and its management which the board considers to be extremely damaging to the Company and its reputation.
The Company took steps to identify the posters who try to escape liability for their defamatory postings by hiding behind a cloak of anonymity, using anonymous email, social networking or bulletin board accounts to disseminate those postings. In some cases the names and other details used to register these accounts are fictitious and posters also can try and cover their tracks using numerous pseudonyms but they can be traced through their IP addresses.
The operators of the bulletin board services can be prevented by confidentiality and data protection laws from disclosing the names and other personal information associated with the accounts. However, the English Courts can exercise their discretion and order such disclosure, provided certain criteria are met.

NH In the High Court of Justice on 28 June 2010 Nighthawk obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order instructing iii and ADVFN to provide information in respect of various posters, who were posting material that the Court accepted could be defamatory.
Both iii and ADVFN are assisting the Company with providing the relevant information including details of the posters.
The identities of various individuals behind these postings have now been established and the Company and its directors are now considering with their legal advisers instituting civil proceedings against them for defamation.
NH what a waste of time
NH the previous management
NH had better things to do
NH rather than trying to chase muppets through the courts
NH always a danger sign that
NH or when a company starts firing off writs
NH and moaning about short sellers
BE Always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always blows up.
BE It's guaranteed.
NH yep
NH and if the CEO also has a beard
NH or wears a leather biker jacket
NH then its probably terminal
NH and administration beckons

[duplicate book] 30/11/2010 19:05

I was wondering much the same as mmdark2000........any non sensitive information that can be posted on here would be much appreciated,

[mmdark2000] 30/11/2010 18:55

Hi,

I'm not part of the private board thats been setup, can't get access for some reason, but have also been badly screwed by these guys. Would just like to know if there is any chance of court action or have things hit a deadend?

Thanks

[bi1l] 18/11/2010 12:46

Same here, my conversation however (hopefully) will be in court.

[kishka] 18/11/2010 10:04

same here 3doogle, would be a short conversation

[3doogle] 18/11/2010 10:01

The application for patent protection would have been submitted months ago prior to confirmation. The 'you know who' have the bought the patent rights ( nice and cheap ) from HML and will now go on to pocket any returns from the property rights of any successful outsourcing of vaccines of which the private investors originally contributed their hard earned.

Hope one day to meet this pair to discuss the situation.

3d

[forcemode] 18/11/2010 07:28

tpf,

that publication dated 2010-11-11 i.e. one week ago is for HML which is either still in administration or no more! Anybody know how this can be?

[kishka] 18/11/2010 07:16

i wish pardoe and co the worst of luck, and genuinely hope that some serious misfortune attends them, soon

[thefordprefect] 18/11/2010 02:53

Publication number: WO2010128338 (A2)
Publication date: 2010-11-11
Inventor(s): PARDOE IAN [GB]; BURDEN JOHN [GB] + (PARDOE, IAN, ; BURDEN, JOHN)
Applicant(s): HENDERSON MORLEY PLC [GB]; PARDOE IAN [GB]; BURDEN JOHN [GB] + (HENDERSON MORLEY PLC, ; PARDOE, IAN, ; BURDEN, JOHN)
Classification:
- international: A61K39/00
- European:
Application number: WO2010GB50753 20100510
Priority number(s): GB20090007935 20090508

View INPADOC patent family
View list of citing documents
View document in the European Register


Report a data error here


Abstract of WO 2010128338 (A2)
Translate this text
The use of a Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) or HSV Virus Like Particle (VLP) to express one or more non-HSV antigens, wherein said non HSV antigens comprises a cancer antigen, a Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) polyepitope or an Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) polyepitope.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data supplied from the espacenet database - Worldwide

[esticfartdidiotes] 16/11/2010 07:31

kipper8, I would say you are absolutely right there. Laws exist so that people don't take matters into their own hands. When the laws don't offer protection, all bets are off I suppose.

[kipper8] 13/11/2010 14:33

I lost 15K. I was strung along into believing that we had a deal with share price We had nothing. I do not think that IP and AK were open and honest with us. I am told that they set up a new company even before HML was in administration. Maybe its all gone but I am hoping for two things. AK and IP having to watch their backs all of their lives as some former shareholders are still very angry. Also the two forementioned ba*tards do not live to enjoy their ill gotten gains. This is all in my opinion.

[3doogle] 13/11/2010 14:14

People invested in this company and lots went on to re-invest on the information supplied by the company directors via rns's to the general public.
The validity of these statements issued and the actual facts of events taking place would need proof that any deception towards PI's was taking place.
In other words,can it be proved the directors withheld information pertaining to events that could effect the demise of the company and its private shareholders.

The whole episode, and the company accounts of HML would need to be thoroughly scrutinised by an independent qualified body and presented to both the administrator and companies house.

All IMO and not meant as an accusation against parties concerned.

FWW, I sold out prior to administration of the company and moved on, but, nay forgotten nor forgiven those involved in my financial loss.

3d

[dutch2] 13/11/2010 12:56

I'M SORRY TO SAY YOU'RE ALL WAISTING YOUR TIME AND EFFORTS HERE...ALL IS LOST...THE LAWS OF THIS LAND ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN...MOVE ON !!

[rajstar] 13/11/2010 08:00

tks doggle...any major PI out there wishing to take this further.